TSTP Solution File: CSR114+20 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR114+20 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:08 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.23s 2.38s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 29 ( 15 unt; 0 nHn; 29 RR)
% Number of literals : 71 ( 0 equ; 50 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 37 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_732,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(X1,X2)
| ~ loc(X3,X1)
| ~ scar(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X2,X5)
| ~ subs(X3,stehen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,stadt__1_1)
| ~ val(X5,rom_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yjq674nm/lgb.p',i_0_732) ).
cnf(i_0_229,hypothesis,
val(c495,rom_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yjq674nm/lgb.p',i_0_229) ).
cnf(i_0_230,hypothesis,
sub(c495,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yjq674nm/lgb.p',i_0_230) ).
cnf(i_0_233,hypothesis,
sub(c486,kolosseum_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yjq674nm/lgb.p',i_0_233) ).
cnf(i_0_231,hypothesis,
sub(c494,stadt__1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yjq674nm/lgb.p',i_0_231) ).
cnf(i_0_232,hypothesis,
attr(c494,c495),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yjq674nm/lgb.p',i_0_232) ).
cnf(i_0_599,plain,
( subs(esk27_2(X1,X2),stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yjq674nm/lgb.p',i_0_599) ).
cnf(i_0_600,plain,
( scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yjq674nm/lgb.p',i_0_600) ).
cnf(i_0_601,plain,
( loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yjq674nm/lgb.p',i_0_601) ).
cnf(i_0_222,hypothesis,
in(c505,c494),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yjq674nm/lgb.p',i_0_222) ).
cnf(i_0_234,hypothesis,
loc(c486,c505),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yjq674nm/lgb.p',i_0_234) ).
cnf(c_0_744,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(X1,X2)
| ~ loc(X3,X1)
| ~ scar(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X2,X5)
| ~ subs(X3,stehen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,stadt__1_1)
| ~ val(X5,rom_0) ),
i_0_732 ).
cnf(c_0_745,hypothesis,
val(c495,rom_0),
i_0_229 ).
cnf(c_0_746,hypothesis,
sub(c495,name_1_1),
i_0_230 ).
cnf(c_0_747,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,stadt__1_1)
| ~ subs(X3,stehen_1_1)
| ~ attr(X2,c495)
| ~ scar(X3,X1)
| ~ loc(X3,X4)
| ~ in(X4,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_744,c_0_745]),c_0_746])]) ).
cnf(c_0_748,hypothesis,
sub(c486,kolosseum_1_1),
i_0_233 ).
cnf(c_0_749,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
| ~ subs(X2,stehen_1_1)
| ~ attr(X1,c495)
| ~ scar(X2,c486)
| ~ loc(X2,X3)
| ~ in(X3,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_747,c_0_748]) ).
cnf(c_0_750,hypothesis,
sub(c494,stadt__1_1),
i_0_231 ).
cnf(c_0_751,hypothesis,
attr(c494,c495),
i_0_232 ).
cnf(c_0_752,hypothesis,
( ~ subs(X1,stehen_1_1)
| ~ scar(X1,c486)
| ~ loc(X1,X2)
| ~ in(X2,c494) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_749,c_0_750]),c_0_751])]) ).
cnf(c_0_753,plain,
( subs(esk27_2(X1,X2),stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_599 ).
cnf(c_0_754,plain,
( ~ scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),c486)
| ~ loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ loc(X1,X2)
| ~ in(X3,c494) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_752,c_0_753]) ).
cnf(c_0_755,plain,
( scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_600 ).
cnf(c_0_756,plain,
( ~ loc(esk27_2(c486,X1),X2)
| ~ loc(c486,X1)
| ~ in(X2,c494) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_754,c_0_755]) ).
cnf(c_0_757,plain,
( loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_601 ).
cnf(c_0_758,plain,
( ~ loc(c486,X1)
| ~ in(X1,c494) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_756,c_0_757]) ).
cnf(c_0_759,hypothesis,
in(c505,c494),
i_0_222 ).
cnf(c_0_760,hypothesis,
loc(c486,c505),
i_0_234 ).
cnf(c_0_761,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_758,c_0_759]),c_0_760])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : CSR114+20 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.11 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.30 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.30 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.30 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 10:49:25 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.38 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.15/0.50 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.50 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.15/0.50 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.15/0.50 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.23/2.38 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.23/2.38 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.23/2.38 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.23/2.38 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.23/2.38 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.23/2.38 #
% 7.23/2.38 # Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 7.23/2.38 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.23/2.38
% 7.23/2.38 # Proof found!
% 7.23/2.38 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.23/2.38 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.23/2.38 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.23/2.38
% 7.23/2.38 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.23/2.38 # User time : 0.030 s
% 7.23/2.38 # System time : 0.008 s
% 7.23/2.38 # Total time : 0.038 s
% 7.23/2.38 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.23/2.38
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------