TSTP Solution File: CSR114+2 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR114+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:10 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.51s 2.66s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.51s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   29 (  15 unt;   0 nHn;  29 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   71 (   0 equ;  50 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    9 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   9 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   37 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_983,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X1,X2)
    | ~ loc(X3,X1)
    | ~ scar(X3,X4)
    | ~ attr(X2,X5)
    | ~ subs(X3,stehen_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X4,kolosseum_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X2,stadt__1_1)
    | ~ val(X5,rom_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-epo8i0py/lgb.p',i_0_983) ).

cnf(i_0_434,hypothesis,
    val(c56851,rom_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-epo8i0py/lgb.p',i_0_434) ).

cnf(i_0_435,hypothesis,
    sub(c56851,name_1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-epo8i0py/lgb.p',i_0_435) ).

cnf(i_0_438,hypothesis,
    sub(c56844,kolosseum_1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-epo8i0py/lgb.p',i_0_438) ).

cnf(i_0_436,hypothesis,
    sub(c56850,stadt__1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-epo8i0py/lgb.p',i_0_436) ).

cnf(i_0_437,hypothesis,
    attr(c56850,c56851),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-epo8i0py/lgb.p',i_0_437) ).

cnf(i_0_850,plain,
    ( subs(esk27_2(X1,X2),stehen_1_1)
    | ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-epo8i0py/lgb.p',i_0_850) ).

cnf(i_0_851,plain,
    ( scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-epo8i0py/lgb.p',i_0_851) ).

cnf(i_0_852,plain,
    ( loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-epo8i0py/lgb.p',i_0_852) ).

cnf(i_0_433,hypothesis,
    in(c56853,c56850),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-epo8i0py/lgb.p',i_0_433) ).

cnf(i_0_439,hypothesis,
    loc(c56844,c56853),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-epo8i0py/lgb.p',i_0_439) ).

cnf(c_0_995,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X1,X2)
    | ~ loc(X3,X1)
    | ~ scar(X3,X4)
    | ~ attr(X2,X5)
    | ~ subs(X3,stehen_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X4,kolosseum_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X2,stadt__1_1)
    | ~ val(X5,rom_0) ),
    i_0_983 ).

cnf(c_0_996,hypothesis,
    val(c56851,rom_0),
    i_0_434 ).

cnf(c_0_997,hypothesis,
    sub(c56851,name_1_1),
    i_0_435 ).

cnf(c_0_998,hypothesis,
    ( ~ sub(X1,kolosseum_1_1)
    | ~ sub(X2,stadt__1_1)
    | ~ subs(X3,stehen_1_1)
    | ~ attr(X2,c56851)
    | ~ scar(X3,X1)
    | ~ loc(X3,X4)
    | ~ in(X4,X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_995,c_0_996]),c_0_997])]) ).

cnf(c_0_999,hypothesis,
    sub(c56844,kolosseum_1_1),
    i_0_438 ).

cnf(c_0_1000,hypothesis,
    ( ~ sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
    | ~ subs(X2,stehen_1_1)
    | ~ attr(X1,c56851)
    | ~ scar(X2,c56844)
    | ~ loc(X2,X3)
    | ~ in(X3,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_998,c_0_999]) ).

cnf(c_0_1001,hypothesis,
    sub(c56850,stadt__1_1),
    i_0_436 ).

cnf(c_0_1002,hypothesis,
    attr(c56850,c56851),
    i_0_437 ).

cnf(c_0_1003,hypothesis,
    ( ~ subs(X1,stehen_1_1)
    | ~ scar(X1,c56844)
    | ~ loc(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X2,c56850) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1000,c_0_1001]),c_0_1002])]) ).

cnf(c_0_1004,plain,
    ( subs(esk27_2(X1,X2),stehen_1_1)
    | ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_850 ).

cnf(c_0_1005,plain,
    ( ~ scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),c56844)
    | ~ loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ loc(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X3,c56850) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1003,c_0_1004]) ).

cnf(c_0_1006,plain,
    ( scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_851 ).

cnf(c_0_1007,plain,
    ( ~ loc(esk27_2(c56844,X1),X2)
    | ~ loc(c56844,X1)
    | ~ in(X2,c56850) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1005,c_0_1006]) ).

cnf(c_0_1008,plain,
    ( loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_852 ).

cnf(c_0_1009,plain,
    ( ~ loc(c56844,X1)
    | ~ in(X1,c56850) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1007,c_0_1008]) ).

cnf(c_0_1010,hypothesis,
    in(c56853,c56850),
    i_0_433 ).

cnf(c_0_1011,hypothesis,
    loc(c56844,c56853),
    i_0_439 ).

cnf(c_0_1012,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1009,c_0_1010]),c_0_1011])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : CSR114+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 00:57:41 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.60  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.60  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.19/0.60  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.19/0.60  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.51/2.66  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.51/2.66  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.51/2.66  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.51/2.66  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.51/2.66  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.51/2.66  #
% 7.51/2.66  # Preprocessing time       : 0.032 s
% 7.51/2.66  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.51/2.66  
% 7.51/2.66  # Proof found!
% 7.51/2.66  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.51/2.66  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.51/2.66  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.51/2.66  
% 7.51/2.66  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.51/2.66  # User time                : 0.050 s
% 7.51/2.66  # System time              : 0.015 s
% 7.51/2.66  # Total time               : 0.065 s
% 7.51/2.66  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.51/2.66  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------