TSTP Solution File: CSR114+13 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR114+13 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:03:01 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.49s 48.67s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.49s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 33 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 247 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 135 ( 7 avg)
% Number of connectives : 276 ( 62 ~; 49 |; 161 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 135 ( 9 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 23 ( 22 usr; 3 prp; 0-5 aty)
% Number of functors : 51 ( 51 usr; 46 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 63 ( 10 sgn 20 !; 14 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(synth_qa07_004_mira_wp_311,conjecture,
? [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
( attr(X1,X2)
& loc(X5,X3)
& scar(X5,X4)
& sub(X2,name_1_1)
& sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
& subs(X5,stehen_1_1)
& val(X2,rom_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',synth_qa07_004_mira_wp_311) ).
fof(ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mira_wp_311,hypothesis,
( attr(c112,c113)
& sub(c112,gebietsinstitution_1_1)
& sub(c113,name_1_1)
& val(c113,ponza_0)
& prop(c117,beliebt_1_1)
& sub(c117,ferienziel_1_1)
& pred(c123,tourist_1_1)
& prop(c123,italienisch__1_1)
& attr(c136,c137)
& sub(c136,stadt__1_1)
& sub(c137,name_1_1)
& val(c137,rom_0)
& tupl_p5(c694,c112,c117,c123,c136)
& assoc(ferienziel_1_1,ferien__1_1)
& sub(ferienziel_1_1,ziel_1_1)
& sort(c112,d)
& sort(c112,io)
& card(c112,int1)
& etype(c112,int0)
& fact(c112,real)
& gener(c112,sp)
& quant(c112,one)
& refer(c112,det)
& varia(c112,con)
& sort(c113,na)
& card(c113,int1)
& etype(c113,int0)
& fact(c113,real)
& gener(c113,sp)
& quant(c113,one)
& refer(c113,indet)
& varia(c113,varia_c)
& sort(gebietsinstitution_1_1,d)
& sort(gebietsinstitution_1_1,io)
& card(gebietsinstitution_1_1,int1)
& etype(gebietsinstitution_1_1,int0)
& fact(gebietsinstitution_1_1,real)
& gener(gebietsinstitution_1_1,ge)
& quant(gebietsinstitution_1_1,one)
& refer(gebietsinstitution_1_1,refer_c)
& varia(gebietsinstitution_1_1,varia_c)
& sort(name_1_1,na)
& card(name_1_1,int1)
& etype(name_1_1,int0)
& fact(name_1_1,real)
& gener(name_1_1,ge)
& quant(name_1_1,one)
& refer(name_1_1,refer_c)
& varia(name_1_1,varia_c)
& sort(ponza_0,fe)
& sort(c117,io)
& card(c117,int1)
& etype(c117,int0)
& fact(c117,real)
& gener(c117,sp)
& quant(c117,one)
& refer(c117,indet)
& varia(c117,varia_c)
& sort(beliebt_1_1,nq)
& sort(ferienziel_1_1,io)
& card(ferienziel_1_1,int1)
& etype(ferienziel_1_1,int0)
& fact(ferienziel_1_1,real)
& gener(ferienziel_1_1,ge)
& quant(ferienziel_1_1,one)
& refer(ferienziel_1_1,refer_c)
& varia(ferienziel_1_1,varia_c)
& sort(c123,d)
& card(c123,cons(x_constant,cons(int1,nil)))
& etype(c123,int1)
& fact(c123,real)
& gener(c123,gener_c)
& quant(c123,mult)
& refer(c123,refer_c)
& varia(c123,varia_c)
& sort(tourist_1_1,d)
& card(tourist_1_1,int1)
& etype(tourist_1_1,int0)
& fact(tourist_1_1,real)
& gener(tourist_1_1,ge)
& quant(tourist_1_1,one)
& refer(tourist_1_1,refer_c)
& varia(tourist_1_1,varia_c)
& sort(italienisch__1_1,nq)
& sort(c136,d)
& sort(c136,io)
& card(c136,int1)
& etype(c136,int0)
& fact(c136,real)
& gener(c136,sp)
& quant(c136,one)
& refer(c136,det)
& varia(c136,con)
& sort(c137,na)
& card(c137,int1)
& etype(c137,int0)
& fact(c137,real)
& gener(c137,sp)
& quant(c137,one)
& refer(c137,indet)
& varia(c137,varia_c)
& sort(stadt__1_1,d)
& sort(stadt__1_1,io)
& card(stadt__1_1,int1)
& etype(stadt__1_1,int0)
& fact(stadt__1_1,real)
& gener(stadt__1_1,ge)
& quant(stadt__1_1,one)
& refer(stadt__1_1,refer_c)
& varia(stadt__1_1,varia_c)
& sort(rom_0,fe)
& sort(c694,ent)
& card(c694,card_c)
& etype(c694,etype_c)
& fact(c694,real)
& gener(c694,gener_c)
& quant(c694,quant_c)
& refer(c694,refer_c)
& varia(c694,varia_c)
& sort(ferien__1_1,as)
& card(ferien__1_1,int1)
& etype(ferien__1_1,int0)
& fact(ferien__1_1,real)
& gener(ferien__1_1,ge)
& quant(ferien__1_1,one)
& refer(ferien__1_1,refer_c)
& varia(ferien__1_1,varia_c)
& sort(ziel_1_1,io)
& card(ziel_1_1,int1)
& etype(ziel_1_1,int0)
& fact(ziel_1_1,real)
& gener(ziel_1_1,ge)
& quant(ziel_1_1,one)
& refer(ziel_1_1,refer_c)
& varia(ziel_1_1,varia_c) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mira_wp_311) ).
fof(loc__stehen_1_1_loc,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( loc(X1,X2)
=> ? [X3] :
( loc(X3,X2)
& scar(X3,X1)
& subs(X3,stehen_1_1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR004+0.ax',loc__stehen_1_1_loc) ).
fof(state_adjective__in_state,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( prop(X1,X2)
& state_adjective_state_binding(X2,X3) )
=> ? [X4,X5,X6] :
( in(X6,X4)
& attr(X4,X5)
& loc(X1,X6)
& sub(X4,land_1_1)
& sub(X5,name_1_1)
& val(X5,X3) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR004+0.ax',state_adjective__in_state) ).
fof(fact_8886,axiom,
state_adjective_state_binding(italienisch__1_1,italien_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR004+0.ax',fact_8886) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
( attr(X1,X2)
& loc(X5,X3)
& scar(X5,X4)
& sub(X2,name_1_1)
& sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
& subs(X5,stehen_1_1)
& val(X2,rom_0) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[synth_qa07_004_mira_wp_311]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ epred1_0
<=> ! [X3,X1] :
( ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X3,stadt__1_1)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ val(X1,rom_0) ) ),
introduced(definition) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
! [X6,X7,X8,X9,X10] :
( ~ attr(X6,X7)
| ~ loc(X10,X8)
| ~ scar(X10,X9)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X6,stadt__1_1)
| ~ subs(X10,stehen_1_1)
| ~ val(X7,rom_0) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( epred1_0
| ~ val(X1,rom_0)
| ~ attr(X2,X1)
| ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,stadt__1_1) ),
inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
val(c137,rom_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mira_wp_311]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
sub(c137,name_1_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mira_wp_311]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ epred2_0
<=> ! [X5,X4,X2] :
( ~ subs(X2,stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X2,X5)
| ~ scar(X2,X4) ) ),
introduced(definition) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( ~ val(X1,rom_0)
| ~ subs(X2,stehen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X3,stadt__1_1)
| ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
| ~ scar(X2,X4)
| ~ loc(X2,X5)
| ~ attr(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
( epred1_0
| ~ attr(X1,c137)
| ~ sub(X1,stadt__1_1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
attr(c136,c137),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mira_wp_311]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
sub(c136,stadt__1_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mira_wp_311]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X4,X5] :
( ( loc(esk63_2(X4,X5),X5)
| ~ loc(X4,X5) )
& ( scar(esk63_2(X4,X5),X4)
| ~ loc(X4,X5) )
& ( subs(esk63_2(X4,X5),stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X4,X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[loc__stehen_1_1_loc])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( ~ epred2_0
| ~ epred1_0 ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_6]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
epred1_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( epred2_0
| ~ scar(X1,X2)
| ~ loc(X1,X3)
| ~ subs(X1,stehen_1_1) ),
inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( scar(esk63_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
~ epred2_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( subs(esk63_2(X1,X2),stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( ~ loc(esk63_2(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( loc(esk63_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
fof(c_0_25,plain,
! [X7,X8,X9] :
( ( in(esk50_3(X7,X8,X9),esk48_3(X7,X8,X9))
| ~ prop(X7,X8)
| ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X8,X9) )
& ( attr(esk48_3(X7,X8,X9),esk49_3(X7,X8,X9))
| ~ prop(X7,X8)
| ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X8,X9) )
& ( loc(X7,esk50_3(X7,X8,X9))
| ~ prop(X7,X8)
| ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X8,X9) )
& ( sub(esk48_3(X7,X8,X9),land_1_1)
| ~ prop(X7,X8)
| ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X8,X9) )
& ( sub(esk49_3(X7,X8,X9),name_1_1)
| ~ prop(X7,X8)
| ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X8,X9) )
& ( val(esk49_3(X7,X8,X9),X9)
| ~ prop(X7,X8)
| ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X8,X9) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[state_adjective__in_state])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
~ loc(X1,X2),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( loc(X3,esk50_3(X3,X1,X2))
| ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X1,X2)
| ~ prop(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X1,X2)
| ~ prop(X3,X1) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
state_adjective_state_binding(italienisch__1_1,italien_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_8886]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,hypothesis,
prop(c123,italienisch__1_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mira_wp_311]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
~ prop(X1,italienisch__1_1),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CSR114+13 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 04:05:19 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 1.34/24.39 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.34/24.39 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.34/24.40 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.35/24.55 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.48/47.40 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.48/47.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.48/47.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.48/47.56 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.49/48.67 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 1.49/48.67
% 1.49/48.67 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.49/48.67 # OLD status Res
% 1.49/48.67 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 1.49/48.67 # Preprocessing time : 0.165 s
% 1.49/48.67 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 1.49/48.67
% 1.49/48.67 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.49/48.67 # OLD status Res
% 1.49/48.67 # Preprocessing time : 0.146 s
% 1.49/48.67 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_eb48853eb71ccd2a6fdade56c25b63f5692e1a0c for 23 seconds:
% 1.49/48.67 # Preprocessing time : 0.139 s
% 1.49/48.67
% 1.49/48.67 # Proof found!
% 1.49/48.67 # SZS status Theorem
% 1.49/48.67 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.49/48.67 # Proof object total steps : 33
% 1.49/48.67 # Proof object clause steps : 22
% 1.49/48.67 # Proof object formula steps : 11
% 1.49/48.67 # Proof object conjectures : 12
% 1.49/48.67 # Proof object clause conjectures : 9
% 1.49/48.67 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 1.49/48.67 # Proof object initial clauses used : 13
% 1.49/48.67 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 1.49/48.67 # Proof object generating inferences : 6
% 1.49/48.67 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 11
% 1.49/48.67 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 1.49/48.67 # Parsed axioms : 10189
% 1.49/48.67 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 1.49/48.67 # Initial clauses : 10506
% 1.49/48.67 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 1.49/48.67 # Initial clauses in saturation : 10506
% 1.49/48.67 # Processed clauses : 10979
% 1.49/48.67 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 1.49/48.67 # ...subsumed : 10
% 1.49/48.67 # ...remaining for further processing : 10969
% 1.49/48.67 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 1.49/48.67 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.49/48.67 # Backward-subsumed : 9
% 1.49/48.67 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 1.49/48.67 # Generated clauses : 112626
% 1.49/48.67 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 112626
% 1.49/48.67 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 1.49/48.67 # Paramodulations : 112622
% 1.49/48.67 # Factorizations : 0
% 1.49/48.67 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 1.49/48.67 # Current number of processed clauses : 10955
% 1.49/48.67 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 10239
% 1.49/48.67 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.49/48.67 # Negative unit clauses : 124
% 1.49/48.67 # Non-unit-clauses : 592
% 1.49/48.67 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 112133
% 1.49/48.67 # ...number of literals in the above : 227584
% 1.49/48.67 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.49/48.67 # Current number of archived clauses : 13
% 1.49/48.67 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 43597
% 1.49/48.67 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 24311
% 1.49/48.67 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 10
% 1.49/48.67 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 69290
% 1.49/48.67 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.49/48.67 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 1.49/48.67 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 1.49/48.67 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.49/48.67 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.49/48.67 # Termbank termtop insertions : 551938
% 1.49/48.67
% 1.49/48.67 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.49/48.67 # User time : 1.032 s
% 1.49/48.67 # System time : 0.131 s
% 1.49/48.67 # Total time : 1.163 s
% 1.49/48.67 # Maximum resident set size: 277772 pages
% 1.49/70.43 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.49/70.44 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.49/70.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.49/70.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.49/70.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.49/70.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.49/70.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.49/70.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.49/70.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.49/70.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.49/70.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.49/70.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.49/70.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.49/70.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.49/70.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.49/70.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.49/70.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.49/70.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.49/70.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.49/70.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.49/70.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.49/70.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.49/70.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.49/70.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.49/70.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.49/70.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.49/70.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.49/70.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.49/70.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.49/70.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.49/70.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.49/70.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.49/70.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.49/70.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.49/70.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.49/70.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.49/70.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.49/70.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.49/70.59 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.49/70.61 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.49/70.61 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.49/70.61 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.49/70.61 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.49/70.61 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.49/70.61 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.49/70.62 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.49/70.62 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.49/70.62 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.49/70.62 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.49/70.62 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.49/70.62 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.49/70.63 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.49/70.63 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.49/70.63 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.49/70.63 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------