TSTP Solution File: CSR113+9 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR113+9 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:05 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 5.09s 2.67s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   25 (  14 unt;   0 nHn;  21 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   47 (   0 equ;  30 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   9 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (  19 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_796,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ scar(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4)
    | ~ sub(X4,name_1_1)
    | ~ val(X4,usa_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fqceoedb/input.p',i_0_796) ).

cnf(i_0_300,hypothesis,
    val(c17911,usa_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fqceoedb/input.p',i_0_300) ).

cnf(i_0_301,hypothesis,
    sub(c17911,name_1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fqceoedb/input.p',i_0_301) ).

cnf(i_0_303,hypothesis,
    attr(c17910,c17911),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fqceoedb/input.p',i_0_303) ).

cnf(i_0_33,plain,
    ( scar(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X3,X1)
    | ~ member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fqceoedb/input.p',i_0_33) ).

cnf(i_0_667,plain,
    ( member(X1,cons(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fqceoedb/input.p',i_0_667) ).

cnf(i_0_666,plain,
    member(X1,cons(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fqceoedb/input.p',i_0_666) ).

cnf(i_0_295,hypothesis,
    attr(c17940,c17941),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fqceoedb/input.p',i_0_295) ).

cnf(i_0_293,hypothesis,
    sub(c17941,name_1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fqceoedb/input.p',i_0_293) ).

cnf(c_0_806,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ scar(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4)
    | ~ sub(X4,name_1_1)
    | ~ val(X4,usa_0) ),
    i_0_796 ).

cnf(c_0_807,hypothesis,
    val(c17911,usa_0),
    i_0_300 ).

cnf(c_0_808,hypothesis,
    sub(c17911,name_1_1),
    i_0_301 ).

cnf(c_0_809,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ scar(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X3,c17911) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_806,c_0_807]),c_0_808])]) ).

cnf(c_0_810,hypothesis,
    attr(c17910,c17911),
    i_0_303 ).

cnf(c_0_811,hypothesis,
    ~ scar(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_809,c_0_810]) ).

cnf(c_0_812,plain,
    ( scar(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X3,X1)
    | ~ member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))) ),
    i_0_33 ).

cnf(c_0_813,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil))))
    | ~ attr(X2,X3)
    | ~ sub(X3,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_811,c_0_812]) ).

cnf(c_0_814,plain,
    ( member(X1,cons(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_667 ).

cnf(c_0_815,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))
    | ~ attr(X2,X3)
    | ~ sub(X3,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_813,c_0_814]) ).

cnf(c_0_816,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,cons(name_1_1,nil))
    | ~ attr(X2,X3)
    | ~ sub(X3,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_815,c_0_814]) ).

cnf(c_0_817,plain,
    member(X1,cons(X1,X2)),
    i_0_666 ).

cnf(c_0_818,plain,
    ( ~ attr(X1,X2)
    | ~ sub(X2,name_1_1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_816,c_0_817]) ).

cnf(c_0_819,hypothesis,
    attr(c17940,c17941),
    i_0_295 ).

cnf(c_0_820,hypothesis,
    sub(c17941,name_1_1),
    i_0_293 ).

cnf(c_0_821,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_818,c_0_819]),c_0_820])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : CSR113+9 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 14:23:40 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.43  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.39/0.58  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/0.58  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.39/0.58  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.39/0.58  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 5.09/2.67  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 5.09/2.67  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 5.09/2.67  # Preprocessing time       : 0.020 s
% 5.09/2.67  
% 5.09/2.67  # Proof found!
% 5.09/2.67  # SZS status Theorem
% 5.09/2.67  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.09/2.67  # Proof object total steps             : 25
% 5.09/2.67  # Proof object clause steps            : 16
% 5.09/2.67  # Proof object formula steps           : 9
% 5.09/2.67  # Proof object conjectures             : 3
% 5.09/2.67  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
% 5.09/2.67  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 1
% 5.09/2.67  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 9
% 5.09/2.67  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 9
% 5.09/2.67  # Proof object generating inferences   : 7
% 5.09/2.67  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 4
% 5.09/2.67  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 5.09/2.67  # Parsed axioms                        : 816
% 5.09/2.67  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 5.09/2.67  # Initial clauses                      : 816
% 5.09/2.67  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 5.09/2.67  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 816
% 5.09/2.67  # Processed clauses                    : 945
% 5.09/2.67  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 5.09/2.67  # ...subsumed                          : 18
% 5.09/2.67  # ...remaining for further processing  : 925
% 5.09/2.67  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 5.09/2.67  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 5.09/2.67  # Backward-subsumed                    : 66
% 5.09/2.67  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 5.09/2.67  # Generated clauses                    : 1883
% 5.09/2.67  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 1879
% 5.09/2.67  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 4
% 5.09/2.67  # Paramodulations                      : 1883
% 5.09/2.67  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 5.09/2.67  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 5.09/2.67  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 5.09/2.67  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 5.09/2.67  # Current number of processed clauses  : 859
% 5.09/2.67  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 539
% 5.09/2.67  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 5.09/2.67  #    Negative unit clauses             : 8
% 5.09/2.67  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 312
% 5.09/2.67  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1540
% 5.09/2.67  # ...number of literals in the above   : 4665
% 5.09/2.67  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 5.09/2.67  # Current number of archived clauses   : 66
% 5.09/2.67  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 30062
% 5.09/2.67  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10465
% 5.09/2.67  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 70
% 5.09/2.67  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5145
% 5.09/2.67  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 5.09/2.67  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 5.09/2.67  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 5.09/2.67  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 5.09/2.67  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 5.09/2.67  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 35590
% 5.09/2.67  
% 5.09/2.67  # -------------------------------------------------
% 5.09/2.67  # User time                : 0.060 s
% 5.09/2.67  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 5.09/2.67  # Total time               : 0.063 s
% 5.09/2.67  # ...preprocessing         : 0.020 s
% 5.09/2.67  # ...main loop             : 0.042 s
% 5.09/2.67  # Maximum resident set size: 9972 pages
% 5.09/2.67  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------