TSTP Solution File: CSR113+31 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR113+31 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:04 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.24s 2.64s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 24 ( 14 unt; 0 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 44 ( 0 equ; 27 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 9 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 37 ( 18 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_726,negated_conjecture,
( ~ scar(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ sub(X4,name_1_1)
| ~ val(X4,new_york_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k8emxyic/lgb.p',i_0_726) ).
cnf(i_0_225,hypothesis,
val(c85,new_york_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k8emxyic/lgb.p',i_0_225) ).
cnf(i_0_226,hypothesis,
sub(c85,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k8emxyic/lgb.p',i_0_226) ).
cnf(i_0_228,hypothesis,
attr(c84,c85),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k8emxyic/lgb.p',i_0_228) ).
cnf(i_0_33,plain,
( scar(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k8emxyic/lgb.p',i_0_33) ).
cnf(i_0_597,plain,
( member(X1,cons(X2,X3))
| ~ member(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k8emxyic/lgb.p',i_0_597) ).
cnf(i_0_596,plain,
member(X1,cons(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k8emxyic/lgb.p',i_0_596) ).
cnf(i_0_236,hypothesis,
attr(c70,c71),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k8emxyic/lgb.p',i_0_236) ).
cnf(i_0_234,hypothesis,
sub(c71,familiename_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k8emxyic/lgb.p',i_0_234) ).
cnf(c_0_736,negated_conjecture,
( ~ scar(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ sub(X4,name_1_1)
| ~ val(X4,new_york_0) ),
i_0_726 ).
cnf(c_0_737,hypothesis,
val(c85,new_york_0),
i_0_225 ).
cnf(c_0_738,hypothesis,
sub(c85,name_1_1),
i_0_226 ).
cnf(c_0_739,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c85)
| ~ scar(X2,X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_736,c_0_737]),c_0_738])]) ).
cnf(c_0_740,hypothesis,
attr(c84,c85),
i_0_228 ).
cnf(c_0_741,plain,
( scar(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))) ),
i_0_33 ).
cnf(c_0_742,hypothesis,
~ scar(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_739,c_0_740]) ).
cnf(c_0_743,plain,
( ~ member(X1,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil))))
| ~ sub(X2,X1)
| ~ attr(X3,X2) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_741,c_0_742]) ).
cnf(c_0_744,plain,
( member(X1,cons(X2,X3))
| ~ member(X1,X3) ),
i_0_597 ).
cnf(c_0_745,plain,
( ~ member(X1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))
| ~ sub(X2,X1)
| ~ attr(X3,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_743,c_0_744]) ).
cnf(c_0_746,plain,
member(X1,cons(X1,X2)),
i_0_596 ).
cnf(c_0_747,plain,
( ~ sub(X1,familiename_1_1)
| ~ attr(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_745,c_0_746]) ).
cnf(c_0_748,hypothesis,
attr(c70,c71),
i_0_236 ).
cnf(c_0_749,hypothesis,
sub(c71,familiename_1_1),
i_0_234 ).
cnf(c_0_750,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_747,c_0_748]),c_0_749])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : CSR113+31 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 15:35:51 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.40/0.60 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/0.60 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.40/0.60 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.40/0.60 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.24/2.64 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.24/2.64 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.24/2.64 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.24/2.64 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 8.24/2.64 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 8.24/2.64 #
% 8.24/2.64 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 8.24/2.64 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.24/2.64
% 8.24/2.64 # Proof found!
% 8.24/2.64 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.24/2.64 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.24/2.64 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.24/2.64
% 8.24/2.64 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.24/2.64 # User time : 0.027 s
% 8.24/2.64 # System time : 0.005 s
% 8.24/2.64 # Total time : 0.031 s
% 8.24/2.64 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.24/2.64
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------