TSTP Solution File: CSR113+3 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR113+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:04 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 4.98s 2.69s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.98s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 29 ( 14 unt; 0 nHn; 29 RR)
% Number of literals : 69 ( 0 equ; 47 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 42 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_728,negated_conjecture,
( ~ loc(X1,X2)
| ~ scar(X1,X3)
| ~ attr(X4,X5)
| ~ flp(X2,X4)
| ~ subs(X1,stehen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X3,freiheitsstatue_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
| ~ val(X5,new_york_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-c5mwu9r7/lgb.p',i_0_728) ).
cnf(i_0_229,hypothesis,
val(c15,new_york_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-c5mwu9r7/lgb.p',i_0_229) ).
cnf(i_0_230,hypothesis,
sub(c15,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-c5mwu9r7/lgb.p',i_0_230) ).
cnf(i_0_221,hypothesis,
sub(c5,freiheitsstatue_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-c5mwu9r7/lgb.p',i_0_221) ).
cnf(i_0_595,plain,
( subs(esk27_2(X1,X2),stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-c5mwu9r7/lgb.p',i_0_595) ).
cnf(i_0_596,plain,
( scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-c5mwu9r7/lgb.p',i_0_596) ).
cnf(i_0_597,plain,
( loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-c5mwu9r7/lgb.p',i_0_597) ).
cnf(i_0_585,plain,
( flp(X1,X2)
| ~ in(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-c5mwu9r7/lgb.p',i_0_585) ).
cnf(i_0_224,hypothesis,
in(c33,c14),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-c5mwu9r7/lgb.p',i_0_224) ).
cnf(i_0_232,hypothesis,
attr(c14,c15),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-c5mwu9r7/lgb.p',i_0_232) ).
cnf(i_0_222,hypothesis,
loc(c5,c33),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-c5mwu9r7/lgb.p',i_0_222) ).
cnf(c_0_740,negated_conjecture,
( ~ loc(X1,X2)
| ~ scar(X1,X3)
| ~ attr(X4,X5)
| ~ flp(X2,X4)
| ~ subs(X1,stehen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X3,freiheitsstatue_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
| ~ val(X5,new_york_0) ),
i_0_728 ).
cnf(c_0_741,hypothesis,
val(c15,new_york_0),
i_0_229 ).
cnf(c_0_742,hypothesis,
sub(c15,name_1_1),
i_0_230 ).
cnf(c_0_743,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,freiheitsstatue_1_1)
| ~ subs(X2,stehen_1_1)
| ~ flp(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X4,c15)
| ~ scar(X2,X1)
| ~ loc(X2,X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_740,c_0_741]),c_0_742])]) ).
cnf(c_0_744,hypothesis,
sub(c5,freiheitsstatue_1_1),
i_0_221 ).
cnf(c_0_745,hypothesis,
( ~ subs(X1,stehen_1_1)
| ~ flp(X2,X3)
| ~ attr(X3,c15)
| ~ scar(X1,c5)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_743,c_0_744]) ).
cnf(c_0_746,plain,
( subs(esk27_2(X1,X2),stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_595 ).
cnf(c_0_747,plain,
( ~ flp(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X2,c15)
| ~ scar(esk27_2(X3,X4),c5)
| ~ loc(esk27_2(X3,X4),X1)
| ~ loc(X3,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_745,c_0_746]) ).
cnf(c_0_748,plain,
( scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_596 ).
cnf(c_0_749,plain,
( ~ flp(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X2,c15)
| ~ loc(esk27_2(c5,X3),X1)
| ~ loc(c5,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_747,c_0_748]) ).
cnf(c_0_750,plain,
( loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_597 ).
cnf(c_0_751,plain,
( flp(X1,X2)
| ~ in(X1,X2) ),
i_0_585 ).
cnf(c_0_752,hypothesis,
in(c33,c14),
i_0_224 ).
cnf(c_0_753,plain,
( ~ flp(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X2,c15)
| ~ loc(c5,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_749,c_0_750]) ).
cnf(c_0_754,plain,
flp(c33,c14),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_751,c_0_752]) ).
cnf(c_0_755,hypothesis,
attr(c14,c15),
i_0_232 ).
cnf(c_0_756,hypothesis,
loc(c5,c33),
i_0_222 ).
cnf(c_0_757,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_753,c_0_754]),c_0_755]),c_0_756])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : CSR113+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 18:07:20 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.38/0.61 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.38/0.61 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.38/0.61 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.38/0.61 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 4.98/2.69 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 4.98/2.69 # No SInE strategy applied
% 4.98/2.69 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 4.98/2.69 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 4.98/2.69 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 4.98/2.69 #
% 4.98/2.69 # Preprocessing time : 0.028 s
% 4.98/2.69 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 4.98/2.69
% 4.98/2.69 # Proof found!
% 4.98/2.69 # SZS status Theorem
% 4.98/2.69 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.98/2.69 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.98/2.69
% 4.98/2.69 # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.98/2.69 # User time : 0.056 s
% 4.98/2.69 # System time : 0.005 s
% 4.98/2.69 # Total time : 0.061 s
% 4.98/2.69 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 4.98/2.69
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------