TSTP Solution File: CSR113+25 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR113+25 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:03 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 6.90s 2.64s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 6.90s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   21 (  14 unt;   0 nHn;  19 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   37 (   0 equ;  22 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   9 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (  15 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_786,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ scar(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4)
    | ~ sub(X4,name_1_1)
    | ~ val(X4,usa_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-g24cj5vy/lgb.p',i_0_786) ).

cnf(i_0_293,hypothesis,
    val(c53884,usa_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-g24cj5vy/lgb.p',i_0_293) ).

cnf(i_0_294,hypothesis,
    sub(c53884,name_1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-g24cj5vy/lgb.p',i_0_294) ).

cnf(i_0_296,hypothesis,
    attr(c53883,c53884),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-g24cj5vy/lgb.p',i_0_296) ).

cnf(i_0_33,plain,
    ( scar(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X3,X1)
    | ~ member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-g24cj5vy/lgb.p',i_0_33) ).

cnf(i_0_656,plain,
    member(X1,cons(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-g24cj5vy/lgb.p',i_0_656) ).

cnf(i_0_290,hypothesis,
    attr(c53935,c53936),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-g24cj5vy/lgb.p',i_0_290) ).

cnf(i_0_288,hypothesis,
    sub(c53936,eigenname_1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-g24cj5vy/lgb.p',i_0_288) ).

cnf(c_0_795,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ scar(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X3,X4)
    | ~ sub(X4,name_1_1)
    | ~ val(X4,usa_0) ),
    i_0_786 ).

cnf(c_0_796,hypothesis,
    val(c53884,usa_0),
    i_0_293 ).

cnf(c_0_797,hypothesis,
    sub(c53884,name_1_1),
    i_0_294 ).

cnf(c_0_798,hypothesis,
    ( ~ attr(X1,c53884)
    | ~ scar(X2,X3) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_795,c_0_796]),c_0_797])]) ).

cnf(c_0_799,hypothesis,
    attr(c53883,c53884),
    i_0_296 ).

cnf(c_0_800,plain,
    ( scar(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
    | ~ sub(X1,X2)
    | ~ attr(X3,X1)
    | ~ member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))) ),
    i_0_33 ).

cnf(c_0_801,hypothesis,
    ~ scar(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_798,c_0_799]) ).

cnf(c_0_802,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil))))
    | ~ sub(X2,X1)
    | ~ attr(X3,X2) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_800,c_0_801]) ).

cnf(c_0_803,plain,
    member(X1,cons(X1,X2)),
    i_0_656 ).

cnf(c_0_804,plain,
    ( ~ sub(X1,eigenname_1_1)
    | ~ attr(X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_802,c_0_803]) ).

cnf(c_0_805,hypothesis,
    attr(c53935,c53936),
    i_0_290 ).

cnf(c_0_806,hypothesis,
    sub(c53936,eigenname_1_1),
    i_0_288 ).

cnf(c_0_807,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_804,c_0_805]),c_0_806])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : CSR113+25 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.04/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 14:41:58 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.39/0.59  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/0.59  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.39/0.59  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.39/0.59  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 6.90/2.64  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 6.90/2.64  # No SInE strategy applied
% 6.90/2.64  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 6.90/2.64  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 6.90/2.64  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 6.90/2.64  #
% 6.90/2.64  # Preprocessing time       : 0.029 s
% 6.90/2.64  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 6.90/2.64  
% 6.90/2.64  # Proof found!
% 6.90/2.64  # SZS status Theorem
% 6.90/2.64  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.90/2.64  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 6.90/2.64  
% 6.90/2.64  # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.90/2.64  # User time                : 0.051 s
% 6.90/2.64  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 6.90/2.64  # Total time               : 0.056 s
% 6.90/2.64  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 6.90/2.64  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------