TSTP Solution File: CSR113+23 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR113+23 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:03 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 9.03s 2.85s
% Output : CNFRefutation 9.03s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 21 ( 14 unt; 0 nHn; 19 RR)
% Number of literals : 37 ( 0 equ; 22 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 9 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 15 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_956,negated_conjecture,
( ~ scar(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ sub(X4,name_1_1)
| ~ val(X4,usa_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-47t53455/input.p',i_0_956) ).
cnf(i_0_426,hypothesis,
val(c43442,usa_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-47t53455/input.p',i_0_426) ).
cnf(i_0_427,hypothesis,
sub(c43442,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-47t53455/input.p',i_0_427) ).
cnf(i_0_429,hypothesis,
attr(c43441,c43442),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-47t53455/input.p',i_0_429) ).
cnf(i_0_33,plain,
( scar(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-47t53455/input.p',i_0_33) ).
cnf(i_0_826,plain,
member(X1,cons(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-47t53455/input.p',i_0_826) ).
cnf(i_0_444,hypothesis,
attr(c43364,c43365),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-47t53455/input.p',i_0_444) ).
cnf(i_0_442,hypothesis,
sub(c43365,eigenname_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-47t53455/input.p',i_0_442) ).
cnf(c_0_965,negated_conjecture,
( ~ scar(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ sub(X4,name_1_1)
| ~ val(X4,usa_0) ),
i_0_956 ).
cnf(c_0_966,hypothesis,
val(c43442,usa_0),
i_0_426 ).
cnf(c_0_967,hypothesis,
sub(c43442,name_1_1),
i_0_427 ).
cnf(c_0_968,negated_conjecture,
( ~ scar(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,c43442) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_965,c_0_966]),c_0_967])]) ).
cnf(c_0_969,hypothesis,
attr(c43441,c43442),
i_0_429 ).
cnf(c_0_970,hypothesis,
~ scar(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_968,c_0_969]) ).
cnf(c_0_971,plain,
( scar(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))) ),
i_0_33 ).
cnf(c_0_972,plain,
( ~ member(X1,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil))))
| ~ attr(X2,X3)
| ~ sub(X3,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_970,c_0_971]) ).
cnf(c_0_973,plain,
member(X1,cons(X1,X2)),
i_0_826 ).
cnf(c_0_974,plain,
( ~ attr(X1,X2)
| ~ sub(X2,eigenname_1_1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_972,c_0_973]) ).
cnf(c_0_975,hypothesis,
attr(c43364,c43365),
i_0_444 ).
cnf(c_0_976,hypothesis,
sub(c43365,eigenname_1_1),
i_0_442 ).
cnf(c_0_977,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_974,c_0_975]),c_0_976])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.14 % Problem : CSR113+23 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.16/0.36 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.16/0.36 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 14:29:09 EDT 2022
% 0.16/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.47 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.38/0.63 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.38/0.63 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.38/0.63 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.38/0.63 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 9.03/2.85 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 9.03/2.85 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 9.03/2.85 # Preprocessing time : 0.025 s
% 9.03/2.85
% 9.03/2.85 # Proof found!
% 9.03/2.85 # SZS status Theorem
% 9.03/2.85 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.03/2.85 # Proof object total steps : 21
% 9.03/2.85 # Proof object clause steps : 13
% 9.03/2.85 # Proof object formula steps : 8
% 9.03/2.85 # Proof object conjectures : 3
% 9.03/2.85 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 9.03/2.85 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 9.03/2.85 # Proof object initial clauses used : 8
% 9.03/2.85 # Proof object initial formulas used : 8
% 9.03/2.85 # Proof object generating inferences : 5
% 9.03/2.85 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 4
% 9.03/2.85 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 9.03/2.85 # Parsed axioms : 976
% 9.03/2.85 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 9.03/2.85 # Initial clauses : 976
% 9.03/2.85 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 9.03/2.85 # Initial clauses in saturation : 976
% 9.03/2.85 # Processed clauses : 1041
% 9.03/2.85 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 9.03/2.85 # ...subsumed : 10
% 9.03/2.85 # ...remaining for further processing : 1029
% 9.03/2.85 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 9.03/2.85 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 9.03/2.85 # Backward-subsumed : 41
% 9.03/2.85 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 9.03/2.85 # Generated clauses : 1904
% 9.03/2.85 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1899
% 9.03/2.85 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 9.03/2.85 # Paramodulations : 1904
% 9.03/2.85 # Factorizations : 0
% 9.03/2.85 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 9.03/2.85 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 9.03/2.85 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 9.03/2.85 # Current number of processed clauses : 988
% 9.03/2.85 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 682
% 9.03/2.85 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 9.03/2.85 # Negative unit clauses : 7
% 9.03/2.85 # Non-unit-clauses : 299
% 9.03/2.85 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1718
% 9.03/2.85 # ...number of literals in the above : 5119
% 9.03/2.85 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 9.03/2.85 # Current number of archived clauses : 41
% 9.03/2.85 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 31160
% 9.03/2.85 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11066
% 9.03/2.85 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 45
% 9.03/2.85 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2433
% 9.03/2.85 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 9.03/2.85 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 9.03/2.85 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 9.03/2.85 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 9.03/2.85 # Condensation successes : 0
% 9.03/2.85 # Termbank termtop insertions : 36254
% 9.03/2.85
% 9.03/2.85 # -------------------------------------------------
% 9.03/2.85 # User time : 0.058 s
% 9.03/2.85 # System time : 0.008 s
% 9.03/2.85 # Total time : 0.066 s
% 9.03/2.85 # ...preprocessing : 0.025 s
% 9.03/2.85 # ...main loop : 0.041 s
% 9.03/2.85 # Maximum resident set size: 10768 pages
% 9.03/2.85
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------