TSTP Solution File: CSR113+17 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR113+17 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:01 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.38s 2.84s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.38s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 23 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 19 RR)
% Number of literals : 45 ( 0 equ; 30 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 9 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 43 ( 22 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_694,negated_conjecture,
( ~ scar(X1,X2)
| ~ flp(X3,X4)
| ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
| ~ val(X5,new_york_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o_2jv1z6/lgb.p',i_0_694) ).
cnf(i_0_193,hypothesis,
val(c2581,new_york_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o_2jv1z6/lgb.p',i_0_193) ).
cnf(i_0_194,hypothesis,
sub(c2581,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o_2jv1z6/lgb.p',i_0_194) ).
cnf(i_0_192,hypothesis,
flp(c2588,c2034),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o_2jv1z6/lgb.p',i_0_192) ).
cnf(i_0_33,plain,
( scar(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o_2jv1z6/lgb.p',i_0_33) ).
cnf(i_0_565,plain,
( member(X1,cons(X2,X3))
| ~ member(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o_2jv1z6/lgb.p',i_0_565) ).
cnf(i_0_564,plain,
member(X1,cons(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o_2jv1z6/lgb.p',i_0_564) ).
cnf(i_0_196,hypothesis,
attr(c2580,c2581),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o_2jv1z6/lgb.p',i_0_196) ).
cnf(c_0_703,negated_conjecture,
( ~ scar(X1,X2)
| ~ flp(X3,X4)
| ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
| ~ val(X5,new_york_0) ),
i_0_694 ).
cnf(c_0_704,hypothesis,
val(c2581,new_york_0),
i_0_193 ).
cnf(c_0_705,hypothesis,
sub(c2581,name_1_1),
i_0_194 ).
cnf(c_0_706,hypothesis,
( ~ flp(X1,X2)
| ~ scar(X3,X4) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_703,c_0_704]),c_0_705])]) ).
cnf(c_0_707,hypothesis,
flp(c2588,c2034),
i_0_192 ).
cnf(c_0_708,plain,
( scar(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))) ),
i_0_33 ).
cnf(c_0_709,hypothesis,
~ scar(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_706,c_0_707]) ).
cnf(c_0_710,plain,
( ~ attr(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X3,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil))))
| ~ sub(X2,X3) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_708,c_0_709]) ).
cnf(c_0_711,plain,
( member(X1,cons(X2,X3))
| ~ member(X1,X3) ),
i_0_565 ).
cnf(c_0_712,plain,
( ~ attr(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X3,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))
| ~ sub(X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_710,c_0_711]) ).
cnf(c_0_713,plain,
( ~ attr(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X3,cons(name_1_1,nil))
| ~ sub(X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_712,c_0_711]) ).
cnf(c_0_714,plain,
member(X1,cons(X1,X2)),
i_0_564 ).
cnf(c_0_715,plain,
( ~ attr(X1,X2)
| ~ sub(X2,name_1_1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_713,c_0_714]) ).
cnf(c_0_716,hypothesis,
attr(c2580,c2581),
i_0_196 ).
cnf(c_0_717,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_715,c_0_716]),c_0_705])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : CSR113+17 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.10/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 10:07:50 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.41/0.60 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.41/0.60 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.41/0.60 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.41/0.60 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.38/2.84 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.38/2.84 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.38/2.84 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.38/2.84 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 8.38/2.84 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 8.38/2.84 #
% 8.38/2.84 # Preprocessing time : 0.025 s
% 8.38/2.84 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.38/2.84
% 8.38/2.84 # Proof found!
% 8.38/2.84 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.38/2.84 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.38/2.84 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.38/2.84
% 8.38/2.84 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.38/2.84 # User time : 0.040 s
% 8.38/2.84 # System time : 0.010 s
% 8.38/2.84 # Total time : 0.050 s
% 8.38/2.84 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.38/2.84
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------