TSTP Solution File: CSR113+14 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR113+14 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:01 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 6.91s 2.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 6.91s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 26 ( 11 unt; 0 nHn; 26 RR)
% Number of literals : 58 ( 0 equ; 39 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 41 ( 5 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_722,negated_conjecture,
( ~ loc(X1,X2)
| ~ scar(X1,X3)
| ~ attr(X4,X5)
| ~ flp(X2,X4)
| ~ subs(X1,stehen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
| ~ val(X5,new_york_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xomnq7h6/input.p',i_0_722) ).
cnf(i_0_221,hypothesis,
val(c38,new_york_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xomnq7h6/input.p',i_0_221) ).
cnf(i_0_222,hypothesis,
sub(c38,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xomnq7h6/input.p',i_0_222) ).
cnf(i_0_590,plain,
( scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xomnq7h6/input.p',i_0_590) ).
cnf(i_0_589,plain,
( subs(esk27_2(X1,X2),stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xomnq7h6/input.p',i_0_589) ).
cnf(i_0_591,plain,
( loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xomnq7h6/input.p',i_0_591) ).
cnf(i_0_579,plain,
( flp(X1,X2)
| ~ in(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xomnq7h6/input.p',i_0_579) ).
cnf(i_0_229,hypothesis,
loc(c29,c41),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xomnq7h6/input.p',i_0_229) ).
cnf(i_0_220,hypothesis,
in(c41,c37),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xomnq7h6/input.p',i_0_220) ).
cnf(i_0_224,hypothesis,
attr(c37,c38),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xomnq7h6/input.p',i_0_224) ).
cnf(c_0_733,negated_conjecture,
( ~ loc(X1,X2)
| ~ scar(X1,X3)
| ~ attr(X4,X5)
| ~ flp(X2,X4)
| ~ subs(X1,stehen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
| ~ val(X5,new_york_0) ),
i_0_722 ).
cnf(c_0_734,hypothesis,
val(c38,new_york_0),
i_0_221 ).
cnf(c_0_735,hypothesis,
sub(c38,name_1_1),
i_0_222 ).
cnf(c_0_736,negated_conjecture,
( ~ scar(X1,X2)
| ~ flp(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X4,c38)
| ~ loc(X1,X3)
| ~ subs(X1,stehen_1_1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_733,c_0_734]),c_0_735])]) ).
cnf(c_0_737,plain,
( scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_590 ).
cnf(c_0_738,plain,
( subs(esk27_2(X1,X2),stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_589 ).
cnf(c_0_739,plain,
( ~ flp(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X2,c38)
| ~ loc(esk27_2(X3,X4),X1)
| ~ loc(X3,X4) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_736,c_0_737]),c_0_738]) ).
cnf(c_0_740,plain,
( loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_591 ).
cnf(c_0_741,plain,
( ~ flp(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X2,c38)
| ~ loc(X3,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_739,c_0_740]) ).
cnf(c_0_742,plain,
( flp(X1,X2)
| ~ in(X1,X2) ),
i_0_579 ).
cnf(c_0_743,plain,
( ~ attr(X1,c38)
| ~ loc(X2,X3)
| ~ in(X3,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_741,c_0_742]) ).
cnf(c_0_744,hypothesis,
loc(c29,c41),
i_0_229 ).
cnf(c_0_745,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c38)
| ~ in(c41,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_743,c_0_744]) ).
cnf(c_0_746,hypothesis,
in(c41,c37),
i_0_220 ).
cnf(c_0_747,hypothesis,
attr(c37,c38),
i_0_224 ).
cnf(c_0_748,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_745,c_0_746]),c_0_747])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : CSR113+14 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 18:35:24 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.37/0.61 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/0.61 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.37/0.61 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.37/0.61 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 6.91/2.62 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 6.91/2.62 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 6.91/2.62 # Preprocessing time : 0.020 s
% 6.91/2.62
% 6.91/2.62 # Proof found!
% 6.91/2.62 # SZS status Theorem
% 6.91/2.62 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.91/2.62 # Proof object total steps : 26
% 6.91/2.62 # Proof object clause steps : 16
% 6.91/2.62 # Proof object formula steps : 10
% 6.91/2.62 # Proof object conjectures : 3
% 6.91/2.62 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 6.91/2.62 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 6.91/2.62 # Proof object initial clauses used : 10
% 6.91/2.62 # Proof object initial formulas used : 10
% 6.91/2.62 # Proof object generating inferences : 6
% 6.91/2.62 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 5
% 6.91/2.62 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 6.91/2.62 # Parsed axioms : 742
% 6.91/2.62 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 6.91/2.62 # Initial clauses : 742
% 6.91/2.62 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 6.91/2.62 # Initial clauses in saturation : 742
% 6.91/2.62 # Processed clauses : 769
% 6.91/2.62 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 6.91/2.62 # ...subsumed : 1
% 6.91/2.62 # ...remaining for further processing : 766
% 6.91/2.62 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 6.91/2.62 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 6.91/2.62 # Backward-subsumed : 3
% 6.91/2.62 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 6.91/2.62 # Generated clauses : 1688
% 6.91/2.62 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1687
% 6.91/2.62 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 3
% 6.91/2.62 # Paramodulations : 1688
% 6.91/2.62 # Factorizations : 0
% 6.91/2.62 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 6.91/2.62 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 6.91/2.62 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 6.91/2.62 # Current number of processed clauses : 763
% 6.91/2.62 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 437
% 6.91/2.62 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 6.91/2.62 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 6.91/2.62 # Non-unit-clauses : 326
% 6.91/2.62 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1640
% 6.91/2.62 # ...number of literals in the above : 5129
% 6.91/2.62 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 6.91/2.62 # Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 6.91/2.62 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 24048
% 6.91/2.62 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8048
% 6.91/2.62 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 7
% 6.91/2.62 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1755
% 6.91/2.62 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 6.91/2.62 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 6.91/2.62 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 6.91/2.62 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 6.91/2.62 # Condensation successes : 0
% 6.91/2.62 # Termbank termtop insertions : 32778
% 6.91/2.62
% 6.91/2.62 # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.91/2.62 # User time : 0.050 s
% 6.91/2.62 # System time : 0.004 s
% 6.91/2.62 # Total time : 0.054 s
% 6.91/2.62 # ...preprocessing : 0.020 s
% 6.91/2.62 # ...main loop : 0.034 s
% 6.91/2.62 # Maximum resident set size: 9572 pages
% 6.91/2.62
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------