TSTP Solution File: CSR113+12 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR113+12 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:01 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 6.99s 2.71s
% Output : CNFRefutation 6.99s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 21 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 43 ( 0 equ; 30 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 40 ( 19 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_683,negated_conjecture,
( ~ scar(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ sub(X4,name_1_1)
| ~ val(X4,new_york_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jt1hv092/lgb.p',i_0_683) ).
cnf(i_0_195,hypothesis,
val(c32105,new_york_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jt1hv092/lgb.p',i_0_195) ).
cnf(i_0_196,hypothesis,
sub(c32105,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jt1hv092/lgb.p',i_0_196) ).
cnf(i_0_198,hypothesis,
attr(c32104,c32105),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jt1hv092/lgb.p',i_0_198) ).
cnf(i_0_33,plain,
( scar(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jt1hv092/lgb.p',i_0_33) ).
cnf(i_0_554,plain,
( member(X1,cons(X2,X3))
| ~ member(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jt1hv092/lgb.p',i_0_554) ).
cnf(i_0_553,plain,
member(X1,cons(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jt1hv092/lgb.p',i_0_553) ).
cnf(c_0_691,negated_conjecture,
( ~ scar(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ sub(X4,name_1_1)
| ~ val(X4,new_york_0) ),
i_0_683 ).
cnf(c_0_692,hypothesis,
val(c32105,new_york_0),
i_0_195 ).
cnf(c_0_693,hypothesis,
sub(c32105,name_1_1),
i_0_196 ).
cnf(c_0_694,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c32105)
| ~ scar(X2,X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_691,c_0_692]),c_0_693])]) ).
cnf(c_0_695,hypothesis,
attr(c32104,c32105),
i_0_198 ).
cnf(c_0_696,plain,
( scar(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))) ),
i_0_33 ).
cnf(c_0_697,hypothesis,
~ scar(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_694,c_0_695]) ).
cnf(c_0_698,plain,
( ~ member(X1,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil))))
| ~ sub(X2,X1)
| ~ attr(X3,X2) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_696,c_0_697]) ).
cnf(c_0_699,plain,
( member(X1,cons(X2,X3))
| ~ member(X1,X3) ),
i_0_554 ).
cnf(c_0_700,plain,
( ~ member(X1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))
| ~ sub(X2,X1)
| ~ attr(X3,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_698,c_0_699]) ).
cnf(c_0_701,plain,
( ~ member(X1,cons(name_1_1,nil))
| ~ sub(X2,X1)
| ~ attr(X3,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_700,c_0_699]) ).
cnf(c_0_702,plain,
member(X1,cons(X1,X2)),
i_0_553 ).
cnf(c_0_703,plain,
( ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
| ~ attr(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_701,c_0_702]) ).
cnf(c_0_704,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_703,c_0_695]),c_0_693])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : CSR113+12 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 19:29:05 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.37/0.59 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.37/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.37/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 6.99/2.71 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 6.99/2.71 # No SInE strategy applied
% 6.99/2.71 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 6.99/2.71 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 6.99/2.71 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 6.99/2.71 #
% 6.99/2.71 # Preprocessing time : 0.028 s
% 6.99/2.71 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 6.99/2.71
% 6.99/2.71 # Proof found!
% 6.99/2.71 # SZS status Theorem
% 6.99/2.71 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.99/2.71 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 6.99/2.71
% 6.99/2.71 # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.99/2.71 # User time : 0.041 s
% 6.99/2.71 # System time : 0.011 s
% 6.99/2.71 # Total time : 0.052 s
% 6.99/2.71 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 6.99/2.71
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------