TSTP Solution File: CSR107+7 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR107+7 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 07:36:24 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 28.86s 27.95s
% Output : CNFRefutation 28.86s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 19 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 15 ( 8 ~; 4 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 3 sgn 4 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_ALL,conjecture,
? [X2341,X2342] :
( s__overlapsTemporally(s__TimeInterval38_3,X2341)
& s__overlapsTemporally(s__TimeInterval38_3,X2342) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.w5uPlHvZAG/E---3.1_13444.p',prove_from_ALL) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_27874,axiom,
! [X851] :
( s__instance(X851,s__TimeInterval)
=> s__overlapsTemporally(X851,X851) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.w5uPlHvZAG/E---3.1_13444.p',kb_SUMO_27874) ).
fof(local_3,axiom,
s__instance(s__TimeInterval38_3,s__TimeInterval),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.w5uPlHvZAG/E---3.1_13444.p',local_3) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X2341,X2342] :
( s__overlapsTemporally(s__TimeInterval38_3,X2341)
& s__overlapsTemporally(s__TimeInterval38_3,X2342) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_ALL]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X2347] :
( ~ s__instance(X2347,s__TimeInterval)
| s__overlapsTemporally(X2347,X2347) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27874])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X2343,X2344] :
( ~ s__overlapsTemporally(s__TimeInterval38_3,X2343)
| ~ s__overlapsTemporally(s__TimeInterval38_3,X2344) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( s__overlapsTemporally(X1,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimeInterval) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
s__instance(s__TimeInterval38_3,s__TimeInterval),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__overlapsTemporally(s__TimeInterval38_3,X1)
| ~ s__overlapsTemporally(s__TimeInterval38_3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
s__overlapsTemporally(s__TimeInterval38_3,s__TimeInterval38_3),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ s__overlapsTemporally(s__TimeInterval38_3,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : CSR107+7 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Fri May 3 14:57:23 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 26.41/26.61 Running first-order model finding
% 26.41/26.61 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.w5uPlHvZAG/E---3.1_13444.p
% 28.86/27.95 # Version: 3.1.0
% 28.86/27.95 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 28.86/27.95 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 28.86/27.95 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 28.86/27.95 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 28.86/27.95 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 28.86/27.95 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 28.86/27.95 # new_bool_3 with pid 13523 completed with status 0
% 28.86/27.95 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 28.86/27.95 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 28.86/27.95 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 28.86/27.95 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 28.86/27.95 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 28.86/27.95 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 28.86/27.95 # Search class: FGHSS-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 28.86/27.95 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 28.86/27.95 # Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 28.86/27.95 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 135s (1) cores
% 28.86/27.95 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with pid 13527 completed with status 0
% 28.86/27.95 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 28.86/27.95 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 28.86/27.95 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 28.86/27.95 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 28.86/27.95 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 28.86/27.95 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 28.86/27.95 # Search class: FGHSS-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 28.86/27.95 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 28.86/27.95 # Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 28.86/27.95 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 135s (1) cores
% 28.86/27.95 # Preprocessing time : 0.020 s
% 28.86/27.95 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 28.86/27.95
% 28.86/27.95 # Proof found!
% 28.86/27.95 # SZS status Theorem
% 28.86/27.95 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 28.86/27.95 # Parsed axioms : 55597
% 28.86/27.95 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 55429
% 28.86/27.95 # Initial clauses : 214
% 28.86/27.95 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 8
% 28.86/27.95 # Initial clauses in saturation : 206
% 28.86/27.95 # Processed clauses : 256
% 28.86/27.95 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 28.86/27.95 # ...subsumed : 2
% 28.86/27.95 # ...remaining for further processing : 253
% 28.86/27.95 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% 28.86/27.95 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 28.86/27.95 # Backward-subsumed : 2
% 28.86/27.95 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 28.86/27.95 # Generated clauses : 30
% 28.86/27.95 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 26
% 28.86/27.95 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 28.86/27.95 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 23
% 28.86/27.95 # Paramodulations : 26
% 28.86/27.95 # Factorizations : 0
% 28.86/27.95 # NegExts : 0
% 28.86/27.95 # Equation resolutions : 3
% 28.86/27.95 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 28.86/27.95 # Total rewrite steps : 4
% 28.86/27.95 # ...of those cached : 1
% 28.86/27.95 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 28.86/27.95 # Propositional check models : 0
% 28.86/27.95 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 28.86/27.95 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 28.86/27.95 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 28.86/27.95 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 28.86/27.95 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 28.86/27.95 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 28.86/27.95 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 28.86/27.95 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 28.86/27.95 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 28.86/27.95 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 28.86/27.95 # Current number of processed clauses : 44
% 28.86/27.95 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 26
% 28.86/27.95 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 28.86/27.95 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 28.86/27.95 # Non-unit-clauses : 17
% 28.86/27.95 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 179
% 28.86/27.95 # ...number of literals in the above : 776
% 28.86/27.95 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 28.86/27.95 # Current number of archived clauses : 206
% 28.86/27.95 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 13666
% 28.86/27.95 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2331
% 28.86/27.95 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 26
% 28.86/27.95 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 28.86/27.95 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 28.86/27.95 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 28.86/27.95 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 28.86/27.95 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 28.86/27.95 # Condensation successes : 0
% 28.86/27.95 # Termbank termtop insertions : 669969
% 28.86/27.95 # Search garbage collected termcells : 293693
% 28.86/27.95
% 28.86/27.95 # -------------------------------------------------
% 28.86/27.95 # User time : 0.272 s
% 28.86/27.95 # System time : 0.105 s
% 28.86/27.95 # Total time : 0.377 s
% 28.86/27.95 # Maximum resident set size: 132612 pages
% 28.86/27.95
% 28.86/27.95 # -------------------------------------------------
% 28.86/27.95 # User time : 1.105 s
% 28.86/27.95 # System time : 0.166 s
% 28.86/27.95 # Total time : 1.272 s
% 28.86/27.95 # Maximum resident set size: 58284 pages
% 28.86/27.95 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------