TSTP Solution File: CSR104+7 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : CSR104+7 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 07:32:37 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 55.39s 54.67s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 55.39s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    7 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    7 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   1 sgn   1   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_ALL,conjecture,
    ? [X2341] : s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,X2341),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fwTblCMHUx/E---3.1_9502.p',prove_from_ALL) ).

fof(local_4,axiom,
    s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fwTblCMHUx/E---3.1_9502.p',local_4) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X2341] : s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,X2341),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_ALL]) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2342] : ~ s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,X2342),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,plain,
    s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 26.94/27.01  % Problem    : CSR104+7 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 26.94/27.03  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 26.97/27.24  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 26.97/27.24  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 26.97/27.24  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 26.97/27.24  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 26.97/27.24  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 26.97/27.24  % CPULimit   : 300
% 26.97/27.24  % WCLimit    : 300
% 26.97/27.24  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 15:00:05 EDT 2024
% 26.97/27.24  % CPUTime    : 
% 53.10/53.38  Running first-order theorem proving
% 53.10/53.38  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fwTblCMHUx/E---3.1_9502.p
% 55.39/54.67  # Version: 3.1.0
% 55.39/54.67  # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 55.39/54.67  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 55.39/54.67  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 55.39/54.67  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 55.39/54.67  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 55.39/54.67  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 55.39/54.67  # new_bool_3 with pid 9582 completed with status 0
% 55.39/54.67  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 55.39/54.67  # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 55.39/54.67  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 55.39/54.67  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 55.39/54.67  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 55.39/54.67  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 55.39/54.67  # Search class: FGHSS-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 55.39/54.67  # partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 55.39/54.67  # Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 55.39/54.67  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 135s (1) cores
% 55.39/54.67  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with pid 9586 completed with status 0
% 55.39/54.67  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 55.39/54.67  # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 55.39/54.67  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 55.39/54.67  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 55.39/54.67  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 55.39/54.67  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 55.39/54.67  # Search class: FGHSS-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 55.39/54.67  # partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 55.39/54.67  # Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 55.39/54.67  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 135s (1) cores
% 55.39/54.67  # Preprocessing time       : 0.031 s
% 55.39/54.67  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 55.39/54.67  
% 55.39/54.67  # Proof found!
% 55.39/54.67  # SZS status Theorem
% 55.39/54.67  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 55.39/54.67  # Parsed axioms                        : 55592
% 55.39/54.67  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 55419
% 55.39/54.67  # Initial clauses                      : 221
% 55.39/54.67  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 8
% 55.39/54.67  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 213
% 55.39/54.67  # Processed clauses                    : 2
% 55.39/54.67  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 55.39/54.67  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 55.39/54.67  # ...remaining for further processing  : 2
% 55.39/54.67  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 55.39/54.67  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 55.39/54.67  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 55.39/54.67  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 55.39/54.67  # Generated clauses                    : 1
% 55.39/54.67  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 55.39/54.67  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 55.39/54.67  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 55.39/54.67  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 55.39/54.67  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 55.39/54.67  # NegExts                              : 0
% 55.39/54.67  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 55.39/54.67  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 55.39/54.67  # Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 55.39/54.67  # ...of those cached                   : 0
% 55.39/54.67  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 55.39/54.67  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 55.39/54.67  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 55.39/54.67  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 55.39/54.67  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 55.39/54.67  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 55.39/54.67  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 55.39/54.67  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 55.39/54.67  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 55.39/54.67  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 55.39/54.67  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 55.39/54.67  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 55.39/54.67  # Current number of processed clauses  : 1
% 55.39/54.67  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 0
% 55.39/54.67  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 55.39/54.67  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 55.39/54.67  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 55.39/54.67  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 211
% 55.39/54.67  # ...number of literals in the above   : 878
% 55.39/54.67  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 55.39/54.67  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 55.39/54.67  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 55.39/54.67  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 55.39/54.67  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 55.39/54.67  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 55.39/54.67  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 55.39/54.67  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 55.39/54.67  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 55.39/54.67  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 55.39/54.67  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 55.39/54.67  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 666716
% 55.39/54.67  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 293658
% 55.39/54.67  
% 55.39/54.67  # -------------------------------------------------
% 55.39/54.67  # User time                : 0.243 s
% 55.39/54.67  # System time              : 0.108 s
% 55.39/54.67  # Total time               : 0.351 s
% 55.39/54.67  # Maximum resident set size: 132608 pages
% 55.39/54.67  
% 55.39/54.67  # -------------------------------------------------
% 55.39/54.67  # User time                : 1.082 s
% 55.39/54.67  # System time              : 0.154 s
% 55.39/54.67  # Total time               : 1.236 s
% 55.39/54.67  # Maximum resident set size: 58284 pages
% 55.39/54.67  % E---3.1 exiting
% 55.39/54.67  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------