TSTP Solution File: CSR104+5 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR104+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:48:00 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 15.97s 4.87s
% Output : CNFRefutation 15.97s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 35 ( 19 unt; 0 nHn; 35 RR)
% Number of literals : 74 ( 0 equ; 44 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 7 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_3141,plain,
( s__temporalPart(X1,X2)
| ~ s__during(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimeInterval)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__TimeInterval) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-u9xr78uv/lgb.p',i_0_3141) ).
cnf(i_0_3650,plain,
s__during(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-u9xr78uv/lgb.p',i_0_3650) ).
cnf(i_0_3648,plain,
s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_2,s__TimeInterval),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-u9xr78uv/lgb.p',i_0_3648) ).
cnf(i_0_3647,plain,
s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-u9xr78uv/lgb.p',i_0_3647) ).
cnf(i_0_1149,plain,
( s__temporalPart(X1,X2)
| ~ s__temporalPart(X1,X3)
| ~ s__temporalPart(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__TimePosition) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-u9xr78uv/lgb.p',i_0_1149) ).
cnf(i_0_1783,plain,
( s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-u9xr78uv/lgb.p',i_0_1783) ).
cnf(i_0_1724,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-u9xr78uv/lgb.p',i_0_1724) ).
cnf(i_0_1725,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-u9xr78uv/lgb.p',i_0_1725) ).
cnf(i_0_3649,plain,
s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-u9xr78uv/lgb.p',i_0_3649) ).
cnf(i_0_3651,negated_conjecture,
~ s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-u9xr78uv/lgb.p',i_0_3651) ).
cnf(i_0_9,plain,
s__subclass(s__TimeInterval,s__TimePosition),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-u9xr78uv/lgb.p',i_0_9) ).
cnf(i_0_14,plain,
s__subclass(s__TimePoint,s__TimePosition),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-u9xr78uv/lgb.p',i_0_14) ).
cnf(i_0_3646,plain,
s__instance(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimePoint),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-u9xr78uv/lgb.p',i_0_3646) ).
cnf(c_0_3665,plain,
( s__temporalPart(X1,X2)
| ~ s__during(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimeInterval)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__TimeInterval) ),
i_0_3141 ).
cnf(c_0_3666,plain,
s__during(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
i_0_3650 ).
cnf(c_0_3667,plain,
s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_2,s__TimeInterval),
i_0_3648 ).
cnf(c_0_3668,plain,
s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval),
i_0_3647 ).
cnf(c_0_3669,plain,
( s__temporalPart(X1,X2)
| ~ s__temporalPart(X1,X3)
| ~ s__temporalPart(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__TimePosition) ),
i_0_1149 ).
cnf(c_0_3670,plain,
s__temporalPart(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3665,c_0_3666]),c_0_3667]),c_0_3668])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3671,plain,
( s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
i_0_1783 ).
cnf(c_0_3672,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1) ),
i_0_1724 ).
cnf(c_0_3673,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
i_0_1725 ).
cnf(c_0_3674,plain,
( s__temporalPart(X1,s__TimeInterval35_2)
| ~ s__temporalPart(X1,s__TimeInterval35_1)
| ~ s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_2,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3669,c_0_3670]) ).
cnf(c_0_3675,plain,
s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_1),
i_0_3649 ).
cnf(c_0_3676,negated_conjecture,
~ s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
i_0_3651 ).
cnf(c_0_3677,plain,
( s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_3671,c_0_3672]),c_0_3673]) ).
cnf(c_0_3678,plain,
s__subclass(s__TimeInterval,s__TimePosition),
i_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_3679,plain,
( ~ s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_2,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimePosition) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3674,c_0_3675]),c_0_3676]) ).
cnf(c_0_3680,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimeInterval) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3677,c_0_3678]) ).
cnf(c_0_3681,plain,
( ~ s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_2,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimePosition) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3679,c_0_3680]),c_0_3668])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3682,plain,
s__subclass(s__TimePoint,s__TimePosition),
i_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_3683,plain,
~ s__instance(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimePosition),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3681,c_0_3680]),c_0_3667])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3684,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePoint) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3677,c_0_3682]) ).
cnf(c_0_3685,plain,
s__instance(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimePoint),
i_0_3646 ).
cnf(c_0_3686,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3683,c_0_3684]),c_0_3685])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11 % Problem : CSR104+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 03:18:07 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.53/0.73 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.53/0.73 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.53/0.73 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.53/0.73 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 15.97/4.87 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 15.97/4.87 # SinE strategy is gf600_h_gu_R05_F100_L20000
% 15.97/4.87 # Trying AutoSched0 for 149 seconds
% 15.97/4.87 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_C18_F1_AE_Q4_CS_SP_CO_S0Y
% 15.97/4.87 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 15.97/4.87 #
% 15.97/4.87 # Preprocessing time : 0.025 s
% 15.97/4.87
% 15.97/4.87 # Proof found!
% 15.97/4.87 # SZS status Theorem
% 15.97/4.87 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 15.97/4.87 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 15.97/4.87
% 15.97/4.87 # -------------------------------------------------
% 15.97/4.87 # User time : 0.583 s
% 15.97/4.87 # System time : 0.035 s
% 15.97/4.87 # Total time : 0.617 s
% 15.97/4.87 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 15.97/4.87
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------