TSTP Solution File: CSR104+3 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR104+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:02:47 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 88.80s 113.99s
% Output : CNFRefutation 88.80s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 40 ( 23 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 89 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 86 ( 37 ~; 34 |; 8 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 7 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 38 ( 2 sgn 20 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_26636,axiom,
! [X1,X15,X13] :
( ( s__instance(X15,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__subclass(X1,X15)
& s__instance(X13,X1) )
=> s__instance(X13,X15) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_26636) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26635,axiom,
! [X1,X15] :
( s__subclass(X1,X15)
=> ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X15,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_26635) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26696,axiom,
! [X548,X550] :
( ( s__instance(X550,s__TimeInterval)
& s__instance(X548,s__TimeInterval) )
=> ( s__during(X548,X550)
=> s__temporalPart(X548,X550) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_26696) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_27777,axiom,
s__subclass(s__TimeInterval,s__TimePosition),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_27777) ).
fof(prove_from_ALL,conjecture,
s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_ALL) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_28419,axiom,
! [X1034,X1035,X1097] :
( ( s__instance(X1097,s__TimePosition)
& s__instance(X1035,s__TimePosition)
& s__instance(X1034,s__TimePosition) )
=> ( ( s__temporalPart(X1034,X1035)
& s__temporalPart(X1035,X1097) )
=> s__temporalPart(X1034,X1097) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_28419) ).
fof(local_5,axiom,
s__during(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',local_5) ).
fof(local_3,axiom,
s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_2,s__TimeInterval),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',local_3) ).
fof(local_2,axiom,
s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',local_2) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_27781,axiom,
s__subclass(s__TimePoint,s__TimePosition),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_27781) ).
fof(local_1,axiom,
s__instance(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimePoint),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',local_1) ).
fof(local_4,axiom,
s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',local_4) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X16,X17,X18] :
( ~ s__instance(X17,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X16,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X16,X17)
| ~ s__instance(X18,X16)
| s__instance(X18,X17) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26636])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X16,X17] :
( ( s__instance(X16,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X16,X17) )
& ( s__instance(X17,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X16,X17) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26635])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
! [X551,X552] :
( ~ s__instance(X552,s__TimeInterval)
| ~ s__instance(X551,s__TimeInterval)
| ~ s__during(X551,X552)
| s__temporalPart(X551,X552) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26696])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
s__subclass(s__TimeInterval,s__TimePosition),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27777]) ).
fof(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_ALL]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X1098,X1099,X1100] :
( ~ s__instance(X1100,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X1099,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X1098,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__temporalPart(X1098,X1099)
| ~ s__temporalPart(X1099,X1100)
| s__temporalPart(X1098,X1100) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_28419])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( s__temporalPart(X1,X2)
| ~ s__during(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimeInterval)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__TimeInterval) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
s__during(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_2,s__TimeInterval),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimeInterval) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
s__subclass(s__TimePoint,s__TimePosition),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27781]) ).
fof(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
~ s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( s__temporalPart(X1,X2)
| ~ s__temporalPart(X3,X2)
| ~ s__temporalPart(X1,X3)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__TimePosition) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
s__temporalPart(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24]),c_0_25])]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimePosition),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_2,s__TimePosition),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePoint) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
s__instance(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimePoint),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
~ s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( s__temporalPart(X1,s__TimeInterval35_2)
| ~ s__temporalPart(X1,s__TimeInterval35_1)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31]),c_0_32])]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
s__instance(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimePosition),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_37]),c_0_38])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR104+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 00:33:10 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 88.79/111.83 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 88.79/111.84 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 88.80/113.54 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 88.80/113.99 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_63dc1b1eb7d762c2f3686774d32795976f981b97 for 23 seconds:
% 88.80/113.99
% 88.80/113.99 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 88.80/113.99 # OLD status Res
% 88.80/113.99 # Preprocessing time : 7.347 s
% 88.80/113.99 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f6eb5f7f05126ea361481ae651a4823314e3d740 for 23 seconds:
% 88.80/113.99 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,02,20000,1.0)
% 88.80/113.99 # Preprocessing time : 1.453 s
% 88.80/113.99
% 88.80/113.99 # Proof found!
% 88.80/113.99 # SZS status Theorem
% 88.80/113.99 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 88.80/113.99 # Proof object total steps : 40
% 88.80/113.99 # Proof object clause steps : 22
% 88.80/113.99 # Proof object formula steps : 18
% 88.80/113.99 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 88.80/113.99 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 88.80/113.99 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 88.80/113.99 # Proof object initial clauses used : 13
% 88.80/113.99 # Proof object initial formulas used : 12
% 88.80/113.99 # Proof object generating inferences : 8
% 88.80/113.99 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 11
% 88.80/113.99 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 88.80/113.99 # Parsed axioms : 145107
% 88.80/113.99 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 144953
% 88.80/113.99 # Initial clauses : 227
% 88.80/113.99 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 9
% 88.80/113.99 # Initial clauses in saturation : 218
% 88.80/113.99 # Processed clauses : 706
% 88.80/113.99 # ...of these trivial : 42
% 88.80/113.99 # ...subsumed : 140
% 88.80/113.99 # ...remaining for further processing : 524
% 88.80/113.99 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 88.80/113.99 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 88.80/113.99 # Backward-subsumed : 7
% 88.80/113.99 # Backward-rewritten : 42
% 88.80/113.99 # Generated clauses : 2231
% 88.80/113.99 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 2175
% 88.80/113.99 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 24
% 88.80/113.99 # Paramodulations : 2229
% 88.80/113.99 # Factorizations : 0
% 88.80/113.99 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 88.80/113.99 # Current number of processed clauses : 474
% 88.80/113.99 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 68
% 88.80/113.99 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 88.80/113.99 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 88.80/113.99 # Non-unit-clauses : 404
% 88.80/113.99 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 229
% 88.80/113.99 # ...number of literals in the above : 1223
% 88.80/113.99 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 88.80/113.99 # Current number of archived clauses : 49
% 88.80/113.99 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 29285
% 88.80/113.99 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15476
% 88.80/113.99 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 169
% 88.80/113.99 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1249
% 88.80/113.99 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 88.80/113.99 # BW rewrite match attempts : 73
% 88.80/113.99 # BW rewrite match successes : 31
% 88.80/113.99 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 88.80/113.99 # Condensation successes : 0
% 88.80/113.99 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1052061
% 88.80/113.99
% 88.80/113.99 # -------------------------------------------------
% 88.80/113.99 # User time : 1.412 s
% 88.80/113.99 # System time : 0.094 s
% 88.80/113.99 # Total time : 1.506 s
% 88.80/113.99 # Maximum resident set size: 200188 pages
% 88.80/120.86 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 88.80/120.88 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 88.80/120.88 eprover: No such file or directory
% 88.80/120.88 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 88.80/120.88 eprover: No such file or directory
% 88.80/120.89 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 88.80/120.89 eprover: No such file or directory
% 88.80/120.89 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 88.80/120.89 eprover: No such file or directory
% 88.80/120.90 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 88.80/120.90 eprover: No such file or directory
% 88.80/120.91 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 88.80/120.91 eprover: No such file or directory
% 88.80/120.91 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 88.80/120.91 eprover: No such file or directory
% 88.80/120.92 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 88.80/120.92 eprover: No such file or directory
% 88.80/120.92 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 88.80/120.92 eprover: No such file or directory
% 88.80/120.93 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 88.80/120.93 eprover: No such file or directory
% 88.80/134.86 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 88.80/134.90 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 88.80/134.90 eprover: No such file or directory
% 88.80/134.90 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 88.80/134.90 eprover: No such file or directory
% 88.80/134.91 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 88.80/134.91 eprover: No such file or directory
% 88.80/134.91 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 88.80/134.91 eprover: No such file or directory
% 88.80/134.92 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 88.80/134.92 eprover: No such file or directory
% 88.80/134.92 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 88.80/134.92 eprover: No such file or directory
% 88.80/134.93 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 88.80/134.93 eprover: No such file or directory
% 88.80/134.94 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 88.80/134.94 eprover: No such file or directory
% 88.80/134.94 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 88.80/134.94 eprover: No such file or directory
% 88.80/134.95 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 88.80/134.95 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------