TSTP Solution File: CSR104+1 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : CSR104+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 07:36:21 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 3.47s 2.96s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   43 (  23 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   99 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  100 (  44   ~;  41   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   7 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   42 (   2 sgn  20   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_27,axiom,
    ! [X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ( s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass) )
     => ( ( s__subclass(X6,X7)
          & s__instance(X8,X6) )
       => s__instance(X8,X7) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.E6UJXTPtju/E---3.1_9294.p',kb_SUMO_27) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_26,axiom,
    ! [X6,X7] :
      ( s__subclass(X6,X7)
     => ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.E6UJXTPtju/E---3.1_9294.p',kb_SUMO_26) ).

fof(local_1,axiom,
    s__instance(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimePoint),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.E6UJXTPtju/E---3.1_9294.p',local_1) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_1262,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5,X105] :
      ( ( s__instance(X105,s__TimePosition)
        & s__instance(X5,s__TimePosition)
        & s__instance(X4,s__TimePosition) )
     => ( ( s__temporalPart(X4,X5)
          & s__temporalPart(X5,X105) )
       => s__temporalPart(X4,X105) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.E6UJXTPtju/E---3.1_9294.p',kb_SUMO_1262) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_912,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__TimePoint,s__TimePosition),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.E6UJXTPtju/E---3.1_9294.p',kb_SUMO_912) ).

fof(local_2,axiom,
    s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.E6UJXTPtju/E---3.1_9294.p',local_2) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_74,axiom,
    ! [X15,X16] :
      ( ( s__instance(X16,s__TimeInterval)
        & s__instance(X15,s__TimeInterval) )
     => ( s__during(X15,X16)
       => s__temporalPart(X15,X16) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.E6UJXTPtju/E---3.1_9294.p',kb_SUMO_74) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_908,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__TimeInterval,s__TimePosition),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.E6UJXTPtju/E---3.1_9294.p',kb_SUMO_908) ).

fof(local_3,axiom,
    s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_2,s__TimeInterval),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.E6UJXTPtju/E---3.1_9294.p',local_3) ).

fof(prove_from_SUMO,conjecture,
    s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.E6UJXTPtju/E---3.1_9294.p',prove_from_SUMO) ).

fof(local_4,axiom,
    s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.E6UJXTPtju/E---3.1_9294.p',local_4) ).

fof(local_5,axiom,
    s__during(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.E6UJXTPtju/E---3.1_9294.p',local_5) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X687,X688,X689] :
      ( ~ s__instance(X688,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__instance(X687,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__subclass(X687,X688)
      | ~ s__instance(X689,X687)
      | s__instance(X689,X688) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X685,X686] :
      ( ( s__instance(X685,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__subclass(X685,X686) )
      & ( s__instance(X686,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__subclass(X685,X686) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( s__instance(X3,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,X3) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    s__instance(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimePoint),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X594,X595,X596] :
      ( ~ s__instance(X596,s__TimePosition)
      | ~ s__instance(X595,s__TimePosition)
      | ~ s__instance(X594,s__TimePosition)
      | ~ s__temporalPart(X594,X595)
      | ~ s__temporalPart(X595,X596)
      | s__temporalPart(X594,X596) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_1262])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( s__instance(s__TimePoint35_1,X1)
    | ~ s__subclass(s__TimePoint,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    s__subclass(s__TimePoint,s__TimePosition),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_912]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_2]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X663,X664] :
      ( ~ s__instance(X664,s__TimeInterval)
      | ~ s__instance(X663,s__TimeInterval)
      | ~ s__during(X663,X664)
      | s__temporalPart(X663,X664) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_74])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( s__temporalPart(X3,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(X3,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    s__instance(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimePosition),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_1,X1)
    | ~ s__subclass(s__TimeInterval,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    s__subclass(s__TimeInterval,s__TimePosition),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_908]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_2,s__TimeInterval),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( s__temporalPart(X2,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimeInterval)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__TimeInterval)
    | ~ s__during(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

fof(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,X1)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,X2)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(X2,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimePosition),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_2,X1)
    | ~ s__subclass(s__TimeInterval,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( s__temporalPart(s__TimeInterval35_1,X1)
    | ~ s__during(s__TimeInterval35_1,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimeInterval) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    s__during(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_5]) ).

fof(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,X1)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(s__TimeInterval35_1,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33])]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_2,s__TimePosition),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    s__temporalPart(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_28]),c_0_36])]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_40])]),c_0_41]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.08  % Problem    : CSR104+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.02/0.09  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.08/0.29  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.29  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.08/0.29  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.08/0.29  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 14:51:53 EDT 2024
% 0.08/0.29  % CPUTime    : 
% 2.17/2.42  Running first-order model finding
% 2.17/2.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.E6UJXTPtju/E---3.1_9294.p
% 3.47/2.96  # Version: 3.1.0
% 3.47/2.96  # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 3.47/2.96  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.47/2.96  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.47/2.96  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.47/2.96  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.47/2.96  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 3.47/2.96  # new_bool_3 with pid 9372 completed with status 0
% 3.47/2.96  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 3.47/2.96  # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 3.47/2.96  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.47/2.96  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.47/2.96  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.47/2.96  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 3.47/2.96  # Search class: FGHSS-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN
% 3.47/2.96  # partial match(1): FGHSF-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN
% 3.47/2.96  # Scheduled 11 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 3.47/2.96  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_SOS_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4c with 28s (1) cores
% 3.47/2.96  # G-E--_208_C18_SOS_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4c with pid 9376 completed with status 0
% 3.47/2.96  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_SOS_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4c
% 3.47/2.96  # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 3.47/2.96  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.47/2.96  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.47/2.96  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.47/2.96  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 3.47/2.96  # Search class: FGHSS-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN
% 3.47/2.96  # partial match(1): FGHSF-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN
% 3.47/2.96  # Scheduled 11 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 3.47/2.96  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_SOS_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4c with 28s (1) cores
% 3.47/2.96  # Preprocessing time       : 0.006 s
% 3.47/2.96  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 3.47/2.96  
% 3.47/2.96  # Proof found!
% 3.47/2.96  # SZS status Theorem
% 3.47/2.96  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 3.47/2.96  # Parsed axioms                        : 14793
% 3.47/2.96  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 14609
% 3.47/2.96  # Initial clauses                      : 209
% 3.47/2.96  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 4
% 3.47/2.96  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 205
% 3.47/2.96  # Processed clauses                    : 2484
% 3.47/2.96  # ...of these trivial                  : 129
% 3.47/2.96  # ...subsumed                          : 331
% 3.47/2.96  # ...remaining for further processing  : 2024
% 3.47/2.96  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 3
% 3.47/2.96  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 3.47/2.96  # Backward-subsumed                    : 22
% 3.47/2.96  # Backward-rewritten                   : 77
% 3.47/2.96  # Generated clauses                    : 5485
% 3.47/2.96  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4708
% 3.47/2.96  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 3.47/2.96  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 17
% 3.47/2.96  # Paramodulations                      : 5482
% 3.47/2.96  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 3.47/2.96  # NegExts                              : 0
% 3.47/2.96  # Equation resolutions                 : 3
% 3.47/2.96  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 3.47/2.96  # Total rewrite steps                  : 2525
% 3.47/2.96  # ...of those cached                   : 2141
% 3.47/2.96  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 3.47/2.96  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 3.47/2.96  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 3.47/2.96  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 3.47/2.96  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 3.47/2.96  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 3.47/2.96  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 3.47/2.96  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 3.47/2.96  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 3.47/2.96  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 3.47/2.96  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 3.47/2.96  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 3.47/2.96  # Current number of processed clauses  : 1728
% 3.47/2.96  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 524
% 3.47/2.96  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 3.47/2.96  #    Negative unit clauses             : 37
% 3.47/2.96  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1167
% 3.47/2.96  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2562
% 3.47/2.96  # ...number of literals in the above   : 8550
% 3.47/2.96  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 3.47/2.96  # Current number of archived clauses   : 293
% 3.47/2.96  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 109984
% 3.47/2.96  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 58794
% 3.47/2.96  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 65
% 3.47/2.96  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15273
% 3.47/2.96  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 3.47/2.96  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 493
% 3.47/2.96  # BW rewrite match successes           : 34
% 3.47/2.96  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 3.47/2.96  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 3.47/2.96  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 209717
% 3.47/2.96  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 54438
% 3.47/2.96  
% 3.47/2.96  # -------------------------------------------------
% 3.47/2.96  # User time                : 0.245 s
% 3.47/2.96  # System time              : 0.031 s
% 3.47/2.96  # Total time               : 0.276 s
% 3.47/2.96  # Maximum resident set size: 20256 pages
% 3.47/2.96  
% 3.47/2.96  # -------------------------------------------------
% 3.47/2.96  # User time                : 0.484 s
% 3.47/2.96  # System time              : 0.041 s
% 3.47/2.96  # Total time               : 0.524 s
% 3.47/2.96  # Maximum resident set size: 12664 pages
% 3.47/2.96  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------