TSTP Solution File: CSR103+7 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR103+7 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 07:32:36 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 56.48s 55.09s
% Output : CNFRefutation 56.48s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 80 ( 13 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 45 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 98 ( 35 ~; 41 |; 18 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 24 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 37 ( 9 sgn 22 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_ALL,conjecture,
? [X2341] :
! [X2342] : s__instance(X2342,X2341),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6Xsql9pS8f/E---3.1_4045.p',prove_from_ALL) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_32603,axiom,
! [X137,X12,X136] :
( X12 = s__UnionFn(X136,X137)
<=> ! [X1138,X34,X1139] :
( ( s__instance(X136,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X12,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X137,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X1138,X136)
& s__instance(X34,X137)
& s__instance(X1139,X12) )
=> ( s__instance(X1138,X12)
& s__instance(X34,X12)
& ( s__instance(X1139,X136)
| s__instance(X1139,X137) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6Xsql9pS8f/E---3.1_4045.p',kb_SUMO_32603) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26635,axiom,
! [X1,X15] :
( s__subclass(X1,X15)
=> ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X15,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6Xsql9pS8f/E---3.1_4045.p',kb_SUMO_26635) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_35008,axiom,
s__subclass(s__City,s__GeopoliticalArea),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6Xsql9pS8f/E---3.1_4045.p',kb_SUMO_35008) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X2341] :
! [X2342] : s__instance(X2342,X2341),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_ALL]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X2343] : ~ s__instance(esk1_1(X2343),X2343),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X2369,X2370,X2371,X2372,X2373,X2374,X2375,X2376,X2377] :
( ( s__instance(X2372,X2370)
| ~ s__instance(X2372,X2371)
| ~ s__instance(X2373,X2369)
| ~ s__instance(X2374,X2370)
| ~ s__instance(X2371,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2370,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2369,s__SetOrClass)
| X2370 != s__UnionFn(X2371,X2369) )
& ( s__instance(X2373,X2370)
| ~ s__instance(X2372,X2371)
| ~ s__instance(X2373,X2369)
| ~ s__instance(X2374,X2370)
| ~ s__instance(X2371,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2370,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2369,s__SetOrClass)
| X2370 != s__UnionFn(X2371,X2369) )
& ( s__instance(X2374,X2371)
| s__instance(X2374,X2369)
| ~ s__instance(X2372,X2371)
| ~ s__instance(X2373,X2369)
| ~ s__instance(X2374,X2370)
| ~ s__instance(X2371,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2370,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2369,s__SetOrClass)
| X2370 != s__UnionFn(X2371,X2369) )
& ( s__instance(X2377,s__SetOrClass)
| X2376 = s__UnionFn(X2377,X2375) )
& ( s__instance(X2376,s__SetOrClass)
| X2376 = s__UnionFn(X2377,X2375) )
& ( s__instance(X2375,s__SetOrClass)
| X2376 = s__UnionFn(X2377,X2375) )
& ( s__instance(esk2_3(X2375,X2376,X2377),X2377)
| X2376 = s__UnionFn(X2377,X2375) )
& ( s__instance(esk3_3(X2375,X2376,X2377),X2375)
| X2376 = s__UnionFn(X2377,X2375) )
& ( s__instance(esk4_3(X2375,X2376,X2377),X2376)
| X2376 = s__UnionFn(X2377,X2375) )
& ( ~ s__instance(esk4_3(X2375,X2376,X2377),X2377)
| ~ s__instance(esk2_3(X2375,X2376,X2377),X2376)
| ~ s__instance(esk3_3(X2375,X2376,X2377),X2376)
| X2376 = s__UnionFn(X2377,X2375) )
& ( ~ s__instance(esk4_3(X2375,X2376,X2377),X2375)
| ~ s__instance(esk2_3(X2375,X2376,X2377),X2376)
| ~ s__instance(esk3_3(X2375,X2376,X2377),X2376)
| X2376 = s__UnionFn(X2377,X2375) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_32603])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(esk1_1(X1),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| X2 = s__UnionFn(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X2345,X2346] :
( ( s__instance(X2345,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X2345,X2346) )
& ( s__instance(X2346,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X2345,X2346) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26635])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(s__UnionFn(X2,X1),X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
s__subclass(s__City,s__GeopoliticalArea),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_35008]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
s__instance(s__City,s__SetOrClass),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_15]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 26.99/27.01 % Problem : CSR103+7 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 26.99/27.02 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 27.05/27.23 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 27.05/27.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 27.05/27.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 27.05/27.23 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 27.05/27.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 27.05/27.23 % CPULimit : 300
% 27.05/27.23 % WCLimit : 300
% 27.05/27.23 % DateTime : Fri May 3 15:03:49 EDT 2024
% 27.05/27.23 % CPUTime :
% 53.34/53.58 Running first-order theorem proving
% 53.34/53.58 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6Xsql9pS8f/E---3.1_4045.p
% 56.48/55.09 # Version: 3.1.0
% 56.48/55.09 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 56.48/55.09 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 56.48/55.09 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1495s (5) cores
% 56.48/55.09 # Starting new_bool_3 with 299s (1) cores
% 56.48/55.09 # Starting new_bool_1 with 299s (1) cores
% 56.48/55.09 # Starting sh5l with 299s (1) cores
% 56.48/55.09 # sh5l with pid 4126 completed with status 0
% 56.48/55.09 # Result found by sh5l
% 56.48/55.09 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 56.48/55.09 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 56.48/55.09 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1495s (5) cores
% 56.48/55.09 # Starting new_bool_3 with 299s (1) cores
% 56.48/55.09 # Starting new_bool_1 with 299s (1) cores
% 56.48/55.09 # Starting sh5l with 299s (1) cores
% 56.48/55.09 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 56.48/55.09 # Search class: FGHSS-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 56.48/55.09 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 56.48/55.09 # Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 299 seconds (299 total)
% 56.48/55.09 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 135s (1) cores
% 56.48/55.09 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with pid 4129 completed with status 0
% 56.48/55.09 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 56.48/55.09 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 56.48/55.09 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 56.48/55.09 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1495s (5) cores
% 56.48/55.09 # Starting new_bool_3 with 299s (1) cores
% 56.48/55.09 # Starting new_bool_1 with 299s (1) cores
% 56.48/55.09 # Starting sh5l with 299s (1) cores
% 56.48/55.09 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 56.48/55.09 # Search class: FGHSS-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 56.48/55.09 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 56.48/55.09 # Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 299 seconds (299 total)
% 56.48/55.09 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 135s (1) cores
% 56.48/55.09 # Preprocessing time : 0.030 s
% 56.48/55.09 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 56.48/55.09
% 56.48/55.09 # Proof found!
% 56.48/55.09 # SZS status Theorem
% 56.48/55.09 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 56.48/55.09 # Parsed axioms : 55587
% 56.48/55.09 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 55427
% 56.48/55.09 # Initial clauses : 196
% 56.48/55.09 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 25
% 56.48/55.09 # Initial clauses in saturation : 171
% 56.48/55.09 # Processed clauses : 274
% 56.48/55.09 # ...of these trivial : 15
% 56.48/55.09 # ...subsumed : 2
% 56.48/55.09 # ...remaining for further processing : 257
% 56.48/55.09 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 8
% 56.48/55.09 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 56.48/55.09 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 56.48/55.09 # Backward-rewritten : 25
% 56.48/55.09 # Generated clauses : 103
% 56.48/55.09 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 102
% 56.48/55.09 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 56.48/55.09 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 17
% 56.48/55.09 # Paramodulations : 96
% 56.48/55.09 # Factorizations : 0
% 56.48/55.09 # NegExts : 0
% 56.48/55.09 # Equation resolutions : 8
% 56.48/55.09 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 56.48/55.09 # Total rewrite steps : 41
% 56.48/55.09 # ...of those cached : 11
% 56.48/55.09 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 56.48/55.09 # Propositional check models : 0
% 56.48/55.09 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 56.48/55.09 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 56.48/55.09 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 56.48/55.09 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 56.48/55.09 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 56.48/55.09 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 56.48/55.09 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 56.48/55.09 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 56.48/55.09 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 56.48/55.09 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 56.48/55.09 # Current number of processed clauses : 55
% 56.48/55.09 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 28
% 56.48/55.09 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 56.48/55.09 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 56.48/55.09 # Non-unit-clauses : 26
% 56.48/55.09 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 167
% 56.48/55.09 # ...number of literals in the above : 578
% 56.48/55.09 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 56.48/55.09 # Current number of archived clauses : 195
% 56.48/55.09 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4909
% 56.48/55.09 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 875
% 56.48/55.09 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 20
% 56.48/55.09 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 181
% 56.48/55.09 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 56.48/55.09 # BW rewrite match attempts : 22
% 56.48/55.09 # BW rewrite match successes : 22
% 56.48/55.09 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 56.48/55.09 # Condensation successes : 0
% 56.48/55.09 # Termbank termtop insertions : 668341
% 56.48/55.09 # Search garbage collected termcells : 293736
% 56.48/55.09
% 56.48/55.09 # -------------------------------------------------
% 56.48/55.09 # User time : 0.279 s
% 56.48/55.09 # System time : 0.120 s
% 56.48/55.09 # Total time : 0.399 s
% 56.48/55.09 # Maximum resident set size: 132860 pages
% 56.48/55.09
% 56.48/55.09 # -------------------------------------------------
% 56.48/55.09 # User time : 1.248 s
% 56.48/55.09 # System time : 0.182 s
% 56.48/55.09 # Total time : 1.430 s
% 56.48/55.09 # Maximum resident set size: 58276 pages
% 56.48/55.09 % E---3.1 exiting
% 56.48/55.10 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------