TSTP Solution File: CSR103+6 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : CSR103+6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 07:32:36 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 65.63s 64.83s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 65.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    8 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    5 (   1 sgn   4   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_ALL,conjecture,
    ! [X2341] : s__instance(X2341,s__Entity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZQOcCauR63/E---3.1_305.p',prove_from_ALL) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_27371,axiom,
    ! [X857] : s__instance(X857,s__Entity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZQOcCauR63/E---3.1_305.p',kb_SUMO_27371) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X2341] : s__instance(X2341,s__Entity),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_ALL]) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__instance(esk1_0,s__Entity),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X2343] : s__instance(X2343,s__Entity),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27371]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__instance(esk1_0,s__Entity),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    s__instance(X1,s__Entity),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 35.91/35.99  % Problem    : CSR103+6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 35.91/36.01  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 35.94/36.22  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 35.94/36.22  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 35.94/36.22  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 35.94/36.22  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 35.94/36.22  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 35.94/36.22  % CPULimit   : 300
% 35.94/36.22  % WCLimit    : 300
% 35.94/36.22  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 15:12:14 EDT 2024
% 35.94/36.22  % CPUTime    : 
% 63.05/63.32  Running first-order theorem proving
% 63.05/63.32  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZQOcCauR63/E---3.1_305.p
% 65.63/64.83  # Version: 3.1.0
% 65.63/64.83  # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 65.63/64.83  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 65.63/64.83  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1495s (5) cores
% 65.63/64.83  # Starting new_bool_3 with 299s (1) cores
% 65.63/64.83  # Starting new_bool_1 with 299s (1) cores
% 65.63/64.83  # Starting sh5l with 299s (1) cores
% 65.63/64.83  # new_bool_3 with pid 2067 completed with status 0
% 65.63/64.83  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 65.63/64.83  # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 65.63/64.83  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 65.63/64.83  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1495s (5) cores
% 65.63/64.83  # Starting new_bool_3 with 299s (1) cores
% 65.63/64.83  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 65.63/64.83  # Search class: FGHSF-FSLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 65.63/64.83  # Scheduled 10 strats onto 1 cores with 299 seconds (299 total)
% 65.63/64.83  # Starting G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S2U with 54s (1) cores
% 65.63/64.83  # G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S2U with pid 2076 completed with status 0
% 65.63/64.83  # Result found by G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S2U
% 65.63/64.83  # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 65.63/64.83  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 65.63/64.83  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1495s (5) cores
% 65.63/64.83  # Starting new_bool_3 with 299s (1) cores
% 65.63/64.83  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 65.63/64.83  # Search class: FGHSF-FSLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 65.63/64.83  # Scheduled 10 strats onto 1 cores with 299 seconds (299 total)
% 65.63/64.83  # Starting G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S2U with 54s (1) cores
% 65.63/64.83  # Preprocessing time       : 0.033 s
% 65.63/64.83  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 65.63/64.83  
% 65.63/64.83  # Proof found!
% 65.63/64.83  # SZS status Theorem
% 65.63/64.83  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 65.63/64.83  # Parsed axioms                        : 55587
% 65.63/64.83  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 55445
% 65.63/64.83  # Initial clauses                      : 176
% 65.63/64.83  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 9
% 65.63/64.83  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 167
% 65.63/64.83  # Processed clauses                    : 2
% 65.63/64.83  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 65.63/64.83  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 65.63/64.83  # ...remaining for further processing  : 2
% 65.63/64.83  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 65.63/64.83  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 65.63/64.83  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 65.63/64.83  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 65.63/64.83  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 65.63/64.83  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 65.63/64.83  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 65.63/64.83  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 65.63/64.83  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 65.63/64.83  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 65.63/64.83  # NegExts                              : 0
% 65.63/64.83  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 65.63/64.83  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 65.63/64.83  # Total rewrite steps                  : 1
% 65.63/64.83  # ...of those cached                   : 0
% 65.63/64.83  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 65.63/64.83  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 65.63/64.83  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 65.63/64.83  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 65.63/64.83  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 65.63/64.83  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 65.63/64.83  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 65.63/64.83  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 65.63/64.83  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 65.63/64.83  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 65.63/64.83  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 65.63/64.83  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 65.63/64.83  # Current number of processed clauses  : 1
% 65.63/64.83  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
% 65.63/64.83  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 65.63/64.83  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 65.63/64.83  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 65.63/64.83  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 165
% 65.63/64.83  # ...number of literals in the above   : 618
% 65.63/64.83  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 65.63/64.83  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 65.63/64.83  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 65.63/64.83  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 65.63/64.83  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 65.63/64.83  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 65.63/64.83  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 65.63/64.83  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 65.63/64.83  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 65.63/64.83  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 65.63/64.83  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 65.63/64.83  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 662054
% 65.63/64.83  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 292941
% 65.63/64.83  
% 65.63/64.83  # -------------------------------------------------
% 65.63/64.83  # User time                : 0.259 s
% 65.63/64.83  # System time              : 0.100 s
% 65.63/64.83  # Total time               : 0.359 s
% 65.63/64.83  # Maximum resident set size: 132600 pages
% 65.63/64.83  
% 65.63/64.83  # -------------------------------------------------
% 65.63/64.83  # User time                : 1.296 s
% 65.63/64.83  # System time              : 0.149 s
% 65.63/64.83  # Total time               : 1.446 s
% 65.63/64.83  # Maximum resident set size: 58280 pages
% 65.63/64.83  % E---3.1 exiting
% 65.63/64.84  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------