TSTP Solution File: CSR103+5 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR103+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:02:46 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 2.94s 4.11s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.94s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 8 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 8 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 5 ( 1 sgn 4 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_SUMO_MILO,conjecture,
! [X1223] : s__instance(X1223,s__Entity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',prove_from_SUMO_MILO) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_606,axiom,
! [X26] : s__instance(X26,s__Entity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_606) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1223] : s__instance(X1223,s__Entity),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO_MILO]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(esk1_0,s__Entity),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X27] : s__instance(X27,s__Entity),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_606]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(esk1_0,s__Entity),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
s__instance(X1,s__Entity),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR103+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 06:34:37 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 2.94/4.11 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 2.94/4.11 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 2.94/4.11 # Preprocessing time : 0.247 s
% 2.94/4.11
% 2.94/4.11 # Proof found!
% 2.94/4.11 # SZS status Theorem
% 2.94/4.11 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.94/4.11 # Proof object total steps : 8
% 2.94/4.11 # Proof object clause steps : 3
% 2.94/4.11 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 2.94/4.11 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 2.94/4.11 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 2.94/4.11 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 2.94/4.11 # Proof object initial clauses used : 2
% 2.94/4.11 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 2.94/4.11 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 2.94/4.11 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 2.94/4.11 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 2.94/4.11 # Parsed axioms : 16749
% 2.94/4.11 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 16648
% 2.94/4.11 # Initial clauses : 106
% 2.94/4.11 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 8
% 2.94/4.11 # Initial clauses in saturation : 98
% 2.94/4.11 # Processed clauses : 4
% 2.94/4.11 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 2.94/4.11 # ...subsumed : 0
% 2.94/4.11 # ...remaining for further processing : 4
% 2.94/4.11 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 2.94/4.11 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 2.94/4.11 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 2.94/4.11 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 2.94/4.11 # Generated clauses : 0
% 2.94/4.11 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 2.94/4.11 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 2.94/4.11 # Paramodulations : 0
% 2.94/4.11 # Factorizations : 0
% 2.94/4.11 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 2.94/4.11 # Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 2.94/4.11 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 2.94/4.11 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 2.94/4.11 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 2.94/4.11 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 2.94/4.11 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 94
% 2.94/4.11 # ...number of literals in the above : 345
% 2.94/4.11 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 2.94/4.11 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 2.94/4.11 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 2.94/4.11 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 2.94/4.11 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 2.94/4.11 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 2.94/4.11 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 2.94/4.11 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 2.94/4.11 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 2.94/4.11 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 2.94/4.11 # Condensation successes : 0
% 2.94/4.11 # Termbank termtop insertions : 171376
% 2.94/4.11
% 2.94/4.11 # -------------------------------------------------
% 2.94/4.11 # User time : 0.225 s
% 2.94/4.11 # System time : 0.022 s
% 2.94/4.11 # Total time : 0.247 s
% 2.94/4.11 # Maximum resident set size: 43424 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------