TSTP Solution File: CSR103+3 by nanoCoP---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem : CSR103+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:04:38 EDT 2023
% Result : Unknown 147.80s 147.77s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.13 % Problem : CSR103+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Fri May 19 00:03:50 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 10.85/10.72 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 10.85/10.72 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 10.85/10.72 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 21.57/22.01 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 21.57/22.01 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 21.57/22.01 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 32.36/32.46 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 32.36/32.46 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 32.36/32.46 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 43.15/42.84 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 43.15/42.84 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 43.15/42.84 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 47.36/46.95 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 47.36/46.95 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 47.36/46.95 Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 58.40/57.57 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 58.40/57.57 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 58.40/57.57 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 69.35/68.88 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 69.35/68.88 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 69.35/68.88 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 80.22/80.23 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 80.22/80.23 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 80.22/80.23 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 94.19/94.77 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 94.19/94.77 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 94.19/94.77 Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 147.70/147.04 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 147.70/147.04 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 147.70/147.04 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 147.80/147.77 Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------