TSTP Solution File: CSR103+3 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR103+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:58 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.90s 4.22s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.90s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    5 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   3 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    5 (   0 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    2 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2644,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__instance(esk33_0,s__Entity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-w3xb6mc1/lgb.p',i_0_2644) ).

cnf(i_0_406,plain,
    s__instance(X1,s__Entity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-w3xb6mc1/lgb.p',i_0_406) ).

cnf(c_0_2647,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__instance(esk33_0,s__Entity),
    i_0_2644 ).

cnf(c_0_2648,plain,
    s__instance(X1,s__Entity),
    i_0_406 ).

cnf(c_0_2649,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2647,c_0_2648])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.09  % Problem  : CSR103+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.09/0.10  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.09/0.28  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.28  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.28  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.28  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.28  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.28  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.28  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.09/0.28  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 22:01:24 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.28  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.36  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 1.69/1.89  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.69/1.89  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 1.69/1.89  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 1.69/1.89  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.90/4.22  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.90/4.22  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.90/4.22  # Trying AutoSched0 for 149 seconds
% 7.90/4.22  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S032I
% 7.90/4.22  # and selection function SelectUnlessUniqMax.
% 7.90/4.22  #
% 7.90/4.22  # Preprocessing time       : 0.017 s
% 7.90/4.22  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.90/4.22  
% 7.90/4.22  # Proof found!
% 7.90/4.22  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.90/4.22  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.90/4.22  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.90/4.22  
% 7.90/4.22  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.90/4.22  # User time                : 0.016 s
% 7.90/4.22  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 7.90/4.22  # Total time               : 0.021 s
% 7.90/4.22  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.90/4.22  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------