TSTP Solution File: CSR102+3 by nanoCoP---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem : CSR102+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:04:37 EDT 2023
% Result : Unknown 150.71s 150.12s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.14 % Problem : CSR102+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Fri May 19 01:04:05 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 11.65/11.38 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 11.65/11.38 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 11.65/11.38 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 23.00/22.70 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 23.00/22.70 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 23.00/22.70 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 34.26/34.01 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 34.26/34.01 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 34.26/34.01 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 45.25/45.25 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 45.25/45.25 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 45.25/45.25 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 49.51/50.15 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 49.51/50.15 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 49.51/50.15 Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 60.27/60.60 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 60.27/60.60 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 60.27/60.60 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 71.42/71.37 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 71.42/71.37 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 71.42/71.37 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 82.67/82.85 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 82.67/82.85 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 82.67/82.85 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 97.15/97.40 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 97.15/97.40 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 97.15/97.40 Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 150.66/149.33 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 150.66/149.33 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 150.66/149.33 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 150.71/150.12 Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------