TSTP Solution File: CSR101+6 by Etableau---0.67

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : CSR101+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:17:33 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.45s 1.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : CSR101+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 18:10:34 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.45/1.65  # SinE strategy is gf200_h_gu_R03_F100_L20000
% 1.45/1.65  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1.45/1.65  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 1.45/1.65  #
% 1.45/1.65  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.45/1.65  # Number of axioms: 20 Number of unprocessed: 20
% 1.45/1.65  # Tableaux proof search.
% 1.45/1.65  # APR header successfully linked.
% 1.45/1.65  # Hello from C++
% 1.45/1.65  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 1.45/1.65  # Local unification is enabled...
% 1.45/1.65  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 1.45/1.65  # 20 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 1.45/1.65  # Creating start rules for all 2 conjectures.
% 1.45/1.65  # There are 2 start rule candidates:
% 1.45/1.65  # Found 14 unit axioms.
% 1.45/1.65  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 1.45/1.65  # 2 start rule tableaux created.
% 1.45/1.65  # 6 extension rule candidate clauses
% 1.45/1.65  # 14 unit axiom clauses
% 1.45/1.65  
% 1.45/1.65  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 1.45/1.65  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 2
% 1.45/1.65  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 1.45/1.65  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 1.45/1.65  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 1.45/1.65  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 1.45/1.65  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 1.45/1.65  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 1.45/1.65  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 1.45/1.65  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 1.45/1.65  # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.45/1.65  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.45/1.65  # Begin clausification derivation
% 1.45/1.65  
% 1.45/1.65  # End clausification derivation
% 1.45/1.65  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 1.45/1.65  cnf(i_0_2, negated_conjecture, (s__instance(esk1_0,s__Class32_2))).
% 1.45/1.65  cnf(i_0_5, plain, (s__subclass(s__Class32_1,s__Class32_2))).
% 1.45/1.65  cnf(i_0_3, plain, (s__instance(s__Class32_1,s__Class))).
% 1.45/1.65  cnf(i_0_7, plain, (s__instance(s__Class32_2,s__Class))).
% 1.45/1.65  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (s__subclass(s__Animal,s__Organism))).
% 1.45/1.65  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (s__subclass(s__Class32_1,s__Animal))).
% 1.45/1.65  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (s__subclass(s__Organism,s__Agent))).
% 1.45/1.65  cnf(i_0_10, plain, (s__subclass(s__Class,s__SetOrClass))).
% 1.45/1.65  cnf(i_0_8, plain, (s__subclass(s__Class32_2,s__Animal))).
% 1.45/1.65  cnf(i_0_9, plain, (s__subclass(s__Class32_2,s__Class32_3))).
% 1.45/1.65  cnf(i_0_6, plain, (s__subclass(s__Class32_3,s__Class32_1))).
% 1.45/1.65  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (s__instance(s__Class32_3,s__Class))).
% 1.45/1.65  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (s__subclass(s__Class32_3,s__Animal))).
% 1.45/1.65  cnf(i_0_1, negated_conjecture, (~s__instance(esk1_0,s__Class32_1))).
% 1.45/1.65  cnf(i_0_11, plain, (s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)|~s__subclass(X2,X1))).
% 1.45/1.65  cnf(i_0_12, plain, (s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)|~s__subclass(X1,X2))).
% 1.45/1.65  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (s__subclass(X1,X1)|~s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass))).
% 1.45/1.65  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (X1=X2|~s__subclass(X2,X1)|~s__subclass(X1,X2))).
% 1.45/1.65  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (s__instance(X1,X2)|~s__instance(X1,X3)|~s__subclass(X3,X2))).
% 1.45/1.65  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (s__subclass(X1,X2)|~s__subclass(X1,X3)|~s__subclass(X3,X2))).
% 1.45/1.65  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 1.45/1.65  # Begin printing tableau
% 1.45/1.65  # Found 6 steps
% 1.45/1.65  cnf(i_0_2, negated_conjecture, (s__instance(esk1_0,s__Class32_2)), inference(start_rule)).
% 1.45/1.65  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (s__instance(esk1_0,s__Class32_2)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_13])).
% 1.45/1.65  cnf(i_0_51, plain, (s__instance(esk1_0,s__Class32_1)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_1])).
% 1.45/1.65  cnf(i_0_53, plain, (~s__subclass(s__Class32_2,s__Class32_1)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 1.45/1.65  cnf(i_0_70, plain, (~s__subclass(s__Class32_2,s__Animal)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])).
% 1.45/1.65  cnf(i_0_71, plain, (~s__subclass(s__Animal,s__Class32_1)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_71, ...])).
% 1.45/1.65  # End printing tableau
% 1.45/1.65  # SZS output end
% 1.45/1.65  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 1.45/1.65  # Returning from population with 2 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 1.45/1.65  # We now have 2 tableaux to operate on
% 1.45/1.65  # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 1.45/1.65  # Proof search is over...
% 1.45/1.65  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------