TSTP Solution File: CSR101+4 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR101+4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:18:34 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.45s 0.69s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.45s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 48 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 47 ( 20 ~; 17 |; 5 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 25 ( 2 sgn 12 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_27,axiom,
! [X6,X7,X8] :
( ( s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__subclass(X6,X7)
& s__instance(X8,X6) )
=> s__instance(X8,X7) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_27) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26,axiom,
! [X6,X7] :
( s__subclass(X6,X7)
=> ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_26) ).
fof(local_9,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Class32_3,s__Class32_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_9) ).
fof(local_8,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Class32_2,s__Class32_3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_8) ).
fof(prove_from_SUMO,conjecture,
! [X591] :
( s__instance(X591,s__Class32_2)
=> s__instance(X591,s__Class32_1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X596,X597,X598] :
( ~ s__instance(X597,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X596,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X596,X597)
| ~ s__instance(X598,X596)
| s__instance(X598,X597) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X594,X595] :
( ( s__instance(X594,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X594,X595) )
& ( s__instance(X595,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X594,X595) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( s__instance(X3,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
s__subclass(s__Class32_3,s__Class32_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
s__subclass(s__Class32_2,s__Class32_3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_8]) ).
fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X591] :
( s__instance(X591,s__Class32_2)
=> s__instance(X591,s__Class32_1) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__Class32_1)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Class32_3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__Class32_3)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Class32_2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_12]) ).
fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( s__instance(esk1_0,s__Class32_2)
& ~ s__instance(esk1_0,s__Class32_1) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__Class32_1)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Class32_2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
s__instance(esk1_0,s__Class32_2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(esk1_0,s__Class32_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : CSR101+4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 19 01:27:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.45/0.69 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.45/0.69 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.45/0.69 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.45/0.69 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.45/0.69 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.69 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.69 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.69 # new_bool_3 with pid 2681 completed with status 0
% 0.45/0.69 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.45/0.69 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.45/0.69 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.45/0.69 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.45/0.69 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.69 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.45/0.69 # Search class: FHUSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.45/0.69 # partial match(1): FHHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.45/0.69 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.45/0.69 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.69 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 2687 completed with status 0
% 0.45/0.69 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.45/0.69 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.45/0.69 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.45/0.69 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.45/0.69 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.69 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.45/0.69 # Search class: FHUSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.45/0.69 # partial match(1): FHHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.45/0.69 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.45/0.69 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.69 # Preprocessing time : 0.005 s
% 0.45/0.69 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.45/0.69
% 0.45/0.69 # Proof found!
% 0.45/0.69 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.45/0.69 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.45/0.69 # Parsed axioms : 7227
% 0.45/0.69 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7196
% 0.45/0.69 # Initial clauses : 36
% 0.45/0.69 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 0.45/0.69 # Initial clauses in saturation : 32
% 0.45/0.69 # Processed clauses : 90
% 0.45/0.69 # ...of these trivial : 16
% 0.45/0.69 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.45/0.69 # ...remaining for further processing : 74
% 0.45/0.69 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.45/0.69 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.45/0.69 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.45/0.69 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.45/0.69 # Generated clauses : 53
% 0.45/0.69 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 43
% 0.45/0.69 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.45/0.69 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 8
% 0.45/0.69 # Paramodulations : 53
% 0.45/0.69 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.45/0.69 # NegExts : 0
% 0.45/0.69 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.45/0.69 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.45/0.69 # Total rewrite steps : 21
% 0.45/0.69 # ...of those cached : 10
% 0.45/0.69 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.45/0.69 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.45/0.69 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.45/0.69 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.45/0.69 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.45/0.69 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.45/0.69 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.45/0.69 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.45/0.69 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.45/0.69 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.45/0.69 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.45/0.69 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.45/0.69 # Current number of processed clauses : 49
% 0.45/0.69 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 27
% 0.45/0.69 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.45/0.69 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.45/0.69 # Non-unit-clauses : 21
% 0.45/0.69 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 9
% 0.45/0.69 # ...number of literals in the above : 22
% 0.45/0.69 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.45/0.69 # Current number of archived clauses : 25
% 0.45/0.69 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 31
% 0.45/0.69 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 25
% 0.45/0.69 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8
% 0.45/0.69 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.45/0.69 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.45/0.69 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.45/0.69 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.45/0.69 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.45/0.69 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.45/0.69 # Termbank termtop insertions : 78830
% 0.45/0.69 # Search garbage collected termcells : 39282
% 0.45/0.69
% 0.45/0.69 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.45/0.69 # User time : 0.036 s
% 0.45/0.69 # System time : 0.020 s
% 0.45/0.69 # Total time : 0.056 s
% 0.45/0.69 # Maximum resident set size: 16584 pages
% 0.45/0.69
% 0.45/0.69 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.45/0.69 # User time : 0.172 s
% 0.45/0.69 # System time : 0.033 s
% 0.45/0.69 # Total time : 0.205 s
% 0.45/0.69 # Maximum resident set size: 9056 pages
% 0.45/0.69 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------