TSTP Solution File: CSR101+3 by nanoCoP---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem : CSR101+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:04:36 EDT 2023
% Result : Unknown 158.52s 158.00s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CSR101+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Fri May 19 00:08:14 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 11.13/10.87 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 11.13/10.87 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 11.13/10.87 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 22.14/22.34 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 22.14/22.34 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 22.14/22.34 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 33.78/34.36 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 33.78/34.36 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 33.78/34.36 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 46.83/47.17 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 46.83/47.17 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 46.83/47.17 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 50.96/52.02 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 50.96/52.02 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 50.96/52.02 Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 61.58/62.48 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 61.58/62.48 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 61.58/62.48 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 77.24/77.74 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 77.24/77.74 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 77.24/77.74 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 90.75/91.17 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 90.75/91.17 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 90.75/91.17 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 105.03/105.25 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 105.03/105.25 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 105.03/105.25 Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 158.42/157.35 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 158.42/157.35 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 158.42/157.35 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 158.52/158.00 Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------