TSTP Solution File: CSR100+5 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : CSR100+5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:45:01 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 51.91s 8.20s
% Output   : Refutation 51.91s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   64 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   68 (  31   ~;  24   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   34 (  34   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f345141,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f345140,f41256]) ).

fof(f41256,plain,
    s__instance(s__Animal31,s__Class31_2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16758]) ).

fof(f16758,axiom,
    s__instance(s__Animal31,s__Class31_2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_10) ).

fof(f345140,plain,
    ~ s__instance(s__Animal31,s__Class31_2),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f340159,f37568]) ).

fof(f37568,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Class31_3,s__Class31_1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16757]) ).

fof(f16757,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__Class31_3,s__Class31_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_9) ).

fof(f340159,plain,
    ( ~ s__subclass(s__Class31_3,s__Class31_1)
    | ~ s__instance(s__Animal31,s__Class31_2) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f277401,f37999]) ).

fof(f37999,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Class31_2,s__Class31_3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16756]) ).

fof(f16756,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__Class31_2,s__Class31_3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_8) ).

fof(f277401,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ s__subclass(X0,s__Class31_1)
      | ~ s__instance(s__Animal31,X1)
      | ~ s__subclass(X1,X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f277391,f58097]) ).

fof(f58097,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( s__instance(X2,X1)
      | ~ s__instance(X2,X0)
      | ~ s__subclass(X0,X1) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f58096,f52147]) ).

fof(f52147,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__subclass(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27074]) ).

fof(f27074,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X0,s__SetOrClass) )
      | ~ s__subclass(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f19275]) ).

fof(f19275,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( s__subclass(X0,X1)
     => ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X0,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f26]) ).

fof(f26,axiom,
    ! [X5,X6] :
      ( s__subclass(X5,X6)
     => ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X5,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',kb_SUMO_26) ).

fof(f58096,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( s__instance(X2,X1)
      | ~ s__instance(X2,X0)
      | ~ s__subclass(X0,X1)
      | ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f55577,f52146]) ).

fof(f52146,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( s__instance(X0,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__subclass(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27074]) ).

fof(f55577,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( s__instance(X2,X1)
      | ~ s__instance(X2,X0)
      | ~ s__subclass(X0,X1)
      | ~ s__instance(X0,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f31901]) ).

fof(f31901,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( s__instance(X2,X1)
      | ~ s__instance(X2,X0)
      | ~ s__subclass(X0,X1)
      | ~ s__instance(X0,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f31900]) ).

fof(f31900,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( s__instance(X2,X1)
      | ~ s__instance(X2,X0)
      | ~ s__subclass(X0,X1)
      | ~ s__instance(X0,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f21770]) ).

fof(f21770,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( s__instance(X0,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) )
     => ( ( s__instance(X2,X0)
          & s__subclass(X0,X1) )
       => s__instance(X2,X1) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f27]) ).

fof(f27,axiom,
    ! [X5,X6,X7] :
      ( ( s__instance(X5,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass) )
     => ( ( s__instance(X7,X5)
          & s__subclass(X5,X6) )
       => s__instance(X7,X6) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',kb_SUMO_27) ).

fof(f277391,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ s__instance(s__Animal31,X0)
      | ~ s__subclass(X0,s__Class31_1) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f58097,f35830]) ).

fof(f35830,plain,
    ~ s__instance(s__Animal31,s__Class31_1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16761]) ).

fof(f16761,plain,
    ~ s__instance(s__Animal31,s__Class31_1),
    inference(flattening,[],[f16760]) ).

fof(f16760,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__instance(s__Animal31,s__Class31_1),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f16759]) ).

fof(f16759,conjecture,
    s__instance(s__Animal31,s__Class31_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO_MILO) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem    : CSR100+5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.12/0.15  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.37  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.38  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.38  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.38  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 00:36:53 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.38  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.38  % (1949)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.59/0.80  % (1954)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency_531 on theBenchmark for (531ds/0Mi)
% 0.59/0.80  % (1956)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 0.59/0.80  % (1955)ott-10_8_av=off:bd=preordered:bs=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=unused:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=4:nwc=1.7:sp=frequency_522 on theBenchmark for (522ds/0Mi)
% 0.59/0.80  % (1951)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.59/0.80  % (1953)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=32_533 on theBenchmark for (533ds/0Mi)
% 0.59/0.81  % (1952)WARNING: value z3 for option sas not known
% 0.59/0.81  % (1952)dis+2_11_add=large:afr=on:amm=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=off:irw=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sims=off:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.59/0.81  % (1950)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 14.78/2.92  Detected minimum model sizes of [447]
% 14.78/2.92  Detected maximum model sizes of [max]
% 14.78/2.92  Cannot represent all propositional literals internally
% 14.78/2.92  % (1953)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (1953)------------------------------
% 14.78/2.92  % (1953)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 14.78/2.92  % (1953)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 14.78/2.92  
% 14.78/2.92  % (1953)Memory used [KB]: 130062
% 14.78/2.92  % (1953)Time elapsed: 2.121 s
% 14.78/2.92  % (1953)Instructions burned: 6541 (million)
% 15.50/2.93  % (1953)------------------------------
% 15.50/2.93  % (1953)------------------------------
% 15.50/2.97  % (1957)fmb+10_1_fmbas=expand:fmbsr=1.1:gsp=on:nm=4_411 on theBenchmark for (411ds/0Mi)
% 15.99/3.04  Detected minimum model sizes of [447]
% 15.99/3.04  Detected maximum model sizes of [max]
% 15.99/3.04  Cannot represent all propositional literals internally
% 15.99/3.04  % (1951)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (1951)------------------------------
% 15.99/3.04  % (1951)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 15.99/3.04  % (1951)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 15.99/3.04  
% 15.99/3.04  % (1951)Memory used [KB]: 135066
% 15.99/3.04  % (1951)Time elapsed: 2.235 s
% 15.99/3.04  % (1951)Instructions burned: 7771 (million)
% 15.99/3.05  % (1951)------------------------------
% 15.99/3.05  % (1951)------------------------------
% 16.37/3.09  % (1958)ott+1_9_av=off:bd=off:bs=on:gsp=on:lcm=predicate:nm=4:sp=weighted_frequency:urr=on_382 on theBenchmark for (382ds/0Mi)
% 27.06/4.64  Detected minimum model sizes of [447,447,447,447,447,447,447,447,447,447,447,447,447,447,447,447,447,447,447,447,447,447,447,447]
% 27.06/4.64  Detected maximum model sizes of [max,max,max,max,max,max,max,max,max,max,max,max,max,max,max,max,max,max,max,4,max,7,max,max]
% 27.06/4.64  Cannot represent all propositional literals internally
% 27.06/4.64  % (1957)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (1957)------------------------------
% 27.06/4.64  % (1957)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 27.06/4.64  % (1957)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 27.06/4.64  
% 27.06/4.64  % (1957)Memory used [KB]: 118965
% 27.06/4.64  % (1957)Time elapsed: 1.679 s
% 27.06/4.64  % (1957)Instructions burned: 5383 (million)
% 27.06/4.65  % (1957)------------------------------
% 27.06/4.65  % (1957)------------------------------
% 27.62/4.68  % (1959)lrs-11_2:5_fsd=off:fde=none:nm=4:nwc=5.0:sims=off:sp=reverse_weighted_frequency:stl=62_367 on theBenchmark for (367ds/0Mi)
% 28.14/4.79  Detected minimum model sizes of [447]
% 28.14/4.79  Detected maximum model sizes of [max]
% 28.14/4.79  Cannot represent all propositional literals internally
% 28.14/4.79  % (1950)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (1950)------------------------------
% 28.14/4.79  % (1950)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 28.14/4.79  % (1950)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 28.14/4.79  
% 28.14/4.79  % (1950)Memory used [KB]: 268157
% 28.14/4.79  % (1950)Time elapsed: 3.977 s
% 28.14/4.79  % (1950)Instructions burned: 12892 (million)
% 28.14/4.81  % (1950)------------------------------
% 28.14/4.81  % (1950)------------------------------
% 28.60/4.84  % (1960)ott+4_64_acc=on:anc=none:bs=on:bsr=on:fsd=off:gs=on:gsem=off:irw=on:msp=off:nwc=2.5:nicw=on:sims=off_354 on theBenchmark for (354ds/0Mi)
% 51.91/8.18  % (1959)First to succeed.
% 51.91/8.18  % (1959)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-1949"
% 51.91/8.20  % (1959)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 51.91/8.20  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 51.91/8.20  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 51.91/8.20  % (1959)------------------------------
% 51.91/8.20  % (1959)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 51.91/8.20  % (1959)Termination reason: Refutation
% 51.91/8.20  
% 51.91/8.20  % (1959)Memory used [KB]: 106967
% 51.91/8.20  % (1959)Time elapsed: 3.490 s
% 51.91/8.20  % (1959)Instructions burned: 9411 (million)
% 51.91/8.20  % (1949)Success in time 7.81 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------