TSTP Solution File: CSR100+5 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR100+5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:18:33 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.76s 1.06s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.76s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 22 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 45 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 43 ( 20 ~; 16 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 2 sgn 10 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_27,axiom,
! [X6,X7,X8] :
( ( s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__subclass(X6,X7)
& s__instance(X8,X6) )
=> s__instance(X8,X7) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_27) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26,axiom,
! [X6,X7] :
( s__subclass(X6,X7)
=> ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_26) ).
fof(prove_from_SUMO_MILO,conjecture,
s__instance(s__Animal31,s__Class31_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO_MILO) ).
fof(local_9,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Class31_3,s__Class31_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_9) ).
fof(local_8,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Class31_2,s__Class31_3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_8) ).
fof(local_10,axiom,
s__instance(s__Animal31,s__Class31_2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_10) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X1226,X1227,X1228] :
( ~ s__instance(X1227,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1226,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1226,X1227)
| ~ s__instance(X1228,X1226)
| s__instance(X1228,X1227) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X1224,X1225] :
( ( s__instance(X1224,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1224,X1225) )
& ( s__instance(X1225,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1224,X1225) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Animal31,s__Class31_1),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO_MILO])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( s__instance(X3,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Animal31,s__Class31_1),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
s__subclass(s__Class31_3,s__Class31_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Animal31,s__Class31_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__Class31_1)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Class31_3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
s__subclass(s__Class31_2,s__Class31_3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Animal31,s__Class31_3),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__Class31_3)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Class31_2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
s__instance(s__Animal31,s__Class31_2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : CSR100+5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sun May 19 00:36:53 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.49 Running first-order model finding
% 0.22/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.76/1.06 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.76/1.06 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.76/1.06 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.76/1.06 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.76/1.06 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.76/1.06 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.76/1.06 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.76/1.06 # new_bool_1 with pid 2266 completed with status 0
% 0.76/1.06 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.76/1.06 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.76/1.06 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.76/1.06 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.76/1.06 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.76/1.06 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.76/1.06 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.76/1.06 # Search class: FHUSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.76/1.06 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.76/1.06 # Starting G-E--_208_C18CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 150s (1) cores
% 0.76/1.06 # G-E--_208_C18CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2268 completed with status 0
% 0.76/1.06 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.76/1.06 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.76/1.06 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.76/1.06 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.76/1.06 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.76/1.06 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.76/1.06 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.76/1.06 # Search class: FHUSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.76/1.06 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.76/1.06 # Starting G-E--_208_C18CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 150s (1) cores
% 0.76/1.06 # Preprocessing time : 0.009 s
% 0.76/1.06 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.76/1.06
% 0.76/1.06 # Proof found!
% 0.76/1.06 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.76/1.06 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.76/1.06 # Parsed axioms : 16759
% 0.76/1.06 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 16724
% 0.76/1.06 # Initial clauses : 39
% 0.76/1.06 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 0.76/1.06 # Initial clauses in saturation : 35
% 0.76/1.06 # Processed clauses : 91
% 0.76/1.06 # ...of these trivial : 13
% 0.76/1.06 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.76/1.06 # ...remaining for further processing : 78
% 0.76/1.06 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.76/1.06 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.76/1.06 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.76/1.06 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.76/1.06 # Generated clauses : 60
% 0.76/1.06 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 38
% 0.76/1.06 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.76/1.06 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 8
% 0.76/1.06 # Paramodulations : 60
% 0.76/1.06 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.76/1.06 # NegExts : 0
% 0.76/1.06 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.76/1.06 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.76/1.06 # Total rewrite steps : 31
% 0.76/1.06 # ...of those cached : 17
% 0.76/1.06 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.76/1.06 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.76/1.06 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.76/1.06 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.76/1.06 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.76/1.06 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.76/1.06 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.76/1.06 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.76/1.06 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.76/1.06 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.76/1.06 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.76/1.06 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.76/1.06 # Current number of processed clauses : 53
% 0.76/1.06 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 27
% 0.76/1.06 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.76/1.06 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.76/1.06 # Non-unit-clauses : 24
% 0.76/1.06 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6
% 0.76/1.06 # ...number of literals in the above : 15
% 0.76/1.06 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.76/1.06 # Current number of archived clauses : 25
% 0.76/1.06 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 27
% 0.76/1.06 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 21
% 0.76/1.06 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8
% 0.76/1.06 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.76/1.06 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.76/1.06 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.76/1.06 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.76/1.06 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.76/1.06 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.76/1.06 # Termbank termtop insertions : 165485
% 0.76/1.06 # Search garbage collected termcells : 87474
% 0.76/1.06
% 0.76/1.06 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.76/1.06 # User time : 0.069 s
% 0.76/1.06 # System time : 0.042 s
% 0.76/1.06 # Total time : 0.111 s
% 0.76/1.06 # Maximum resident set size: 39676 pages
% 0.76/1.06
% 0.76/1.06 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.76/1.06 # User time : 0.483 s
% 0.76/1.06 # System time : 0.070 s
% 0.76/1.06 # Total time : 0.553 s
% 0.76/1.06 # Maximum resident set size: 18408 pages
% 0.76/1.06 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------