TSTP Solution File: CSR099+5 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR099+5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:14:33 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.77s 1.09s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.77s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 16 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 36 ( 8 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 36 ( 16 ~; 13 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 1 sgn 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_1443,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( ( s__instance(X5,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X4,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__subclass(X4,X5)
& s__subclass(X5,X4) )
=> X4 = X5 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_1443) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26,axiom,
! [X6,X7] :
( s__subclass(X6,X7)
=> ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_26) ).
fof(prove_from_SUMO_MILO,conjecture,
s__Class30_1 = s__Reptile,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO_MILO) ).
fof(local_2,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Class30_1,s__Reptile),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_2) ).
fof(local_3,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Reptile,s__Class30_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_3) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X1229,X1230] :
( ~ s__instance(X1230,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1229,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1229,X1230)
| ~ s__subclass(X1230,X1229)
| X1229 = X1230 ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_1443])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X1223,X1224] :
( ( s__instance(X1223,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1223,X1224) )
& ( s__instance(X1224,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1223,X1224) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
s__Class30_1 != s__Reptile,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO_MILO])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( X2 = X1
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
s__Class30_1 != s__Reptile,
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
s__subclass(s__Class30_1,s__Reptile),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
s__subclass(s__Reptile,s__Class30_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
s__Class30_1 != s__Reptile,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),c_0_14]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : CSR099+5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 19 01:56:23 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.77/1.09 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.77/1.09 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.77/1.09 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.77/1.09 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.77/1.09 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.77/1.09 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.77/1.09 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.77/1.09 # new_bool_3 with pid 12740 completed with status 0
% 0.77/1.09 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.77/1.09 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.77/1.09 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.77/1.09 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.77/1.09 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.77/1.09 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.77/1.09 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.77/1.09 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.77/1.09 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.77/1.09 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with pid 12743 completed with status 0
% 0.77/1.09 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04BN
% 0.77/1.09 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.77/1.09 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.77/1.09 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.77/1.09 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.77/1.09 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.77/1.09 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.77/1.09 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.77/1.09 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.77/1.09 # Preprocessing time : 0.010 s
% 0.77/1.09 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.77/1.09
% 0.77/1.09 # Proof found!
% 0.77/1.09 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.77/1.09 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.77/1.09 # Parsed axioms : 16752
% 0.77/1.09 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 16708
% 0.77/1.09 # Initial clauses : 58
% 0.77/1.09 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 0.77/1.09 # Initial clauses in saturation : 54
% 0.77/1.09 # Processed clauses : 126
% 0.77/1.09 # ...of these trivial : 18
% 0.77/1.09 # ...subsumed : 3
% 0.77/1.09 # ...remaining for further processing : 105
% 0.77/1.09 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.77/1.09 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.77/1.09 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.77/1.09 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.77/1.09 # Generated clauses : 81
% 0.77/1.09 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 45
% 0.77/1.09 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.77/1.09 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 10
% 0.77/1.09 # Paramodulations : 81
% 0.77/1.09 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.77/1.09 # NegExts : 0
% 0.77/1.09 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.77/1.09 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.77/1.09 # Total rewrite steps : 37
% 0.77/1.09 # ...of those cached : 19
% 0.77/1.09 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.77/1.09 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.77/1.09 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.77/1.09 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.77/1.09 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.77/1.09 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.77/1.09 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.77/1.09 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.77/1.09 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.77/1.09 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.77/1.09 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.77/1.09 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.77/1.09 # Current number of processed clauses : 61
% 0.77/1.09 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 33
% 0.77/1.09 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.77/1.09 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.77/1.09 # Non-unit-clauses : 27
% 0.77/1.09 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 16
% 0.77/1.09 # ...number of literals in the above : 58
% 0.77/1.09 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.77/1.09 # Current number of archived clauses : 44
% 0.77/1.09 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 203
% 0.77/1.09 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 113
% 0.77/1.09 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 13
% 0.77/1.09 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 22
% 0.77/1.09 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.77/1.09 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.77/1.09 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.77/1.09 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.77/1.09 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.77/1.09 # Termbank termtop insertions : 167380
% 0.77/1.09 # Search garbage collected termcells : 87659
% 0.77/1.09
% 0.77/1.09 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.77/1.09 # User time : 0.080 s
% 0.77/1.09 # System time : 0.038 s
% 0.77/1.09 # Total time : 0.117 s
% 0.77/1.09 # Maximum resident set size: 39644 pages
% 0.77/1.09
% 0.77/1.09 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.77/1.09 # User time : 0.532 s
% 0.77/1.09 # System time : 0.062 s
% 0.77/1.09 # Total time : 0.594 s
% 0.77/1.09 # Maximum resident set size: 18404 pages
% 0.77/1.09 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.77/1.09 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------