TSTP Solution File: CSR099+4 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR099+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:02:42 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.99s 2.18s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.99s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 16 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 36 ( 8 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 36 ( 16 ~; 13 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 1 sgn 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_1220,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( ( s__instance(X5,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X4,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__subclass(X4,X5)
& s__subclass(X5,X4) )
=> X4 = X5 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_1220) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26,axiom,
! [X6,X7] :
( s__subclass(X6,X7)
=> ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_26) ).
fof(prove_from_SUMO,conjecture,
s__Class30_1 = s__Reptile,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',prove_from_SUMO) ).
fof(local_2,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Class30_1,s__Reptile),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',local_2) ).
fof(local_3,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Reptile,s__Class30_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',local_3) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X6,X7] :
( ~ s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X6,X7)
| ~ s__subclass(X7,X6)
| X6 = X7 ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_1220])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X8,X9] :
( ( s__instance(X8,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X8,X9) )
& ( s__instance(X9,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X8,X9) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
s__Class30_1 != s__Reptile,
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
s__Class30_1 != s__Reptile,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
s__subclass(s__Class30_1,s__Reptile),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
s__subclass(s__Reptile,s__Class30_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
s__Class30_1 != s__Reptile,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),c_0_14]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR099+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 16:02:19 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.99/2.18 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.99/2.18 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.99/2.18 # Preprocessing time : 0.099 s
% 0.99/2.18
% 0.99/2.18 # Proof found!
% 0.99/2.18 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.99/2.18 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.99/2.18 # Proof object total steps : 16
% 0.99/2.18 # Proof object clause steps : 7
% 0.99/2.18 # Proof object formula steps : 9
% 0.99/2.18 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 0.99/2.18 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 0.99/2.18 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.99/2.18 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 0.99/2.18 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 0.99/2.18 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 0.99/2.18 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 5
% 0.99/2.18 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.99/2.18 # Parsed axioms : 7221
% 0.99/2.18 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7144
% 0.99/2.18 # Initial clauses : 88
% 0.99/2.18 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 0.99/2.18 # Initial clauses in saturation : 84
% 0.99/2.18 # Processed clauses : 63
% 0.99/2.18 # ...of these trivial : 5
% 0.99/2.18 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.99/2.18 # ...remaining for further processing : 58
% 0.99/2.18 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.99/2.18 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.99/2.18 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.99/2.18 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.99/2.18 # Generated clauses : 79
% 0.99/2.18 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 51
% 0.99/2.18 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 5
% 0.99/2.18 # Paramodulations : 78
% 0.99/2.18 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.99/2.18 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.99/2.18 # Current number of processed clauses : 56
% 0.99/2.18 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 29
% 0.99/2.18 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.99/2.18 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.99/2.18 # Non-unit-clauses : 26
% 0.99/2.18 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 72
% 0.99/2.18 # ...number of literals in the above : 149
% 0.99/2.18 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.99/2.18 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.99/2.18 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 76
% 0.99/2.18 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 71
% 0.99/2.18 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 5
% 0.99/2.18 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.99/2.18 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.99/2.18 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.99/2.18 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.99/2.18 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.99/2.18 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.99/2.18 # Termbank termtop insertions : 81746
% 0.99/2.18
% 0.99/2.18 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.99/2.18 # User time : 0.092 s
% 0.99/2.18 # System time : 0.009 s
% 0.99/2.18 # Total time : 0.101 s
% 0.99/2.18 # Maximum resident set size: 18576 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------