TSTP Solution File: CSR098+5 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : CSR098+5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:18:31 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.72s 1.04s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.72s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    9 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn   0   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_SUMO_MILO,conjecture,
    s__instance(s__Animal29_1,s__Amphibian),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO_MILO) ).

fof(local_1,axiom,
    s__instance(s__Frog29_1,s__Amphibian),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_1) ).

fof(local_3,axiom,
    s__Frog29_1 = s__Animal29_1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_3) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__instance(s__Animal29_1,s__Amphibian),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO_MILO])]) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__instance(s__Animal29_1,s__Amphibian),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    s__instance(s__Frog29_1,s__Amphibian),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    s__Frog29_1 = s__Animal29_1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__instance(s__Animal29_1,s__Amphibian),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : CSR098+5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 02:18:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.48  Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.72/1.04  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.72/1.04  # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.72/1.04  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.72/1.04  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.72/1.04  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.72/1.04  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.72/1.04  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.72/1.04  # new_bool_3 with pid 20023 completed with status 0
% 0.72/1.04  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.72/1.04  # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.72/1.04  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.72/1.04  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.72/1.04  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.72/1.04  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.72/1.04  # Search class: FGHSS-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.72/1.04  # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.72/1.04  # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.72/1.04  # Starting G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 23s (1) cores
% 0.72/1.04  # G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with pid 20026 completed with status 0
% 0.72/1.04  # Result found by G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S4S
% 0.72/1.04  # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.72/1.04  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.72/1.04  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.72/1.04  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.72/1.04  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.72/1.04  # Search class: FGHSS-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.72/1.04  # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.72/1.04  # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.72/1.04  # Starting G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 23s (1) cores
% 0.72/1.04  # Preprocessing time       : 0.010 s
% 0.72/1.04  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.72/1.04  
% 0.72/1.04  # Proof found!
% 0.72/1.04  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.72/1.04  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.72/1.04  # Parsed axioms                        : 16752
% 0.72/1.04  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 16673
% 0.72/1.04  # Initial clauses                      : 102
% 0.72/1.04  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 20
% 0.72/1.04  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 82
% 0.72/1.04  # Processed clauses                    : 3
% 0.72/1.04  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.72/1.04  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.72/1.04  # ...remaining for further processing  : 2
% 0.72/1.04  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.72/1.04  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.72/1.04  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.72/1.04  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.72/1.04  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.72/1.04  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.72/1.04  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.72/1.04  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.72/1.04  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.72/1.04  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.72/1.04  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.72/1.04  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.72/1.04  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.72/1.04  # Total rewrite steps                  : 1
% 0.72/1.04  # ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.72/1.04  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.72/1.04  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.72/1.04  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.72/1.04  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.72/1.04  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.72/1.04  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.72/1.04  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.72/1.04  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.72/1.04  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.72/1.04  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.72/1.04  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.72/1.04  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.72/1.04  # Current number of processed clauses  : 2
% 0.72/1.04  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
% 0.72/1.04  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.72/1.04  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.72/1.04  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.72/1.04  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 79
% 0.72/1.04  # ...number of literals in the above   : 235
% 0.72/1.04  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.72/1.04  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.72/1.04  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.72/1.04  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.72/1.04  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.72/1.04  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.72/1.04  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.72/1.04  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.72/1.04  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.72/1.04  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.72/1.04  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.72/1.04  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 170719
% 0.72/1.04  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 88556
% 0.72/1.04  
% 0.72/1.04  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.72/1.04  # User time                : 0.070 s
% 0.72/1.04  # System time              : 0.036 s
% 0.72/1.04  # Total time               : 0.106 s
% 0.72/1.04  # Maximum resident set size: 39764 pages
% 0.72/1.04  
% 0.72/1.04  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.72/1.04  # User time                : 0.478 s
% 0.72/1.04  # System time              : 0.059 s
% 0.72/1.04  # Total time               : 0.538 s
% 0.72/1.04  # Maximum resident set size: 18404 pages
% 0.72/1.04  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------