TSTP Solution File: CSR098+3 by nanoCoP---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem : CSR098+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:04:34 EDT 2023
% Result : Unknown 147.81s 149.86s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : CSR098+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri May 19 00:03:03 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 10.94/10.71 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 10.94/10.71 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 10.94/10.71 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 21.87/22.28 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 21.87/22.28 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 21.87/22.28 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 32.72/33.54 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 32.72/33.54 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 32.72/33.54 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 43.68/45.07 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 43.68/45.07 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 43.68/45.07 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 48.06/50.17 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 48.06/50.17 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 48.06/50.17 Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 58.57/61.20 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 58.57/61.20 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 58.57/61.20 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 69.58/72.07 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 69.58/72.07 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 69.58/72.07 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 80.51/83.42 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 80.51/83.42 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 80.51/83.42 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 94.49/97.82 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 94.49/97.82 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 94.49/97.82 Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 147.79/148.93 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 147.79/148.93 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 147.79/148.93 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 147.81/149.86 Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------