TSTP Solution File: CSR097+4 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR097+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:02:39 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.39s 78.58s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.39s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 14
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 44 ( 16 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 156 ( 26 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 45 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 183 ( 71 ~; 79 |; 24 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 24 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 8 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 94 ( 37 sgn 34 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_3496,axiom,
! [X171,X172,X173] :
( X172 = s__UnionFn(X173,X171)
<=> ! [X174,X175,X176] :
( ( s__instance(X173,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X172,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X171,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X174,X173)
& s__instance(X175,X171)
& s__instance(X176,X172) )
=> ( s__instance(X174,X172)
& s__instance(X175,X172)
& ( s__instance(X176,X173)
| s__instance(X176,X171) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_3496) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_502,axiom,
! [X26] : s__instance(X26,s__Entity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_502) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_3533,axiom,
! [X168] :
( s__instance(X168,s__SetOrClass)
=> ( s__instance(X168,s__NullSet)
=> ~ ? [X48] : s__instance(X48,X168) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_3533) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_276,axiom,
! [X9,X10] :
( s__disjoint(X9,X10)
<=> ! [X48] :
( ( s__instance(X10,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X9,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ~ ( s__instance(X48,X9)
& s__instance(X48,X10) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_276) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_27,axiom,
! [X6,X7,X8] :
( ( s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__subclass(X6,X7)
& s__instance(X8,X6) )
=> s__instance(X8,X7) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_27) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_5822,axiom,
s__disjoint(s__AstronomicalBody,s__GeographicArea),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_5822) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_5829,axiom,
s__subclass(s__LocalizablePlace,s__GeographicArea),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_5829) ).
fof(local_2,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Planet28_1,s__AstronomicalBody),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',local_2) ).
fof(local_8,axiom,
s__instance(s__Object28_1,s__Planet28_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',local_8) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X177,X178,X179,X180,X181,X182,X177,X178,X179] :
( ( s__instance(X180,X178)
| ~ s__instance(X180,X179)
| ~ s__instance(X181,X177)
| ~ s__instance(X182,X178)
| ~ s__instance(X179,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X178,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X177,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 != s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(X181,X178)
| ~ s__instance(X180,X179)
| ~ s__instance(X181,X177)
| ~ s__instance(X182,X178)
| ~ s__instance(X179,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X178,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X177,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 != s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(X182,X179)
| s__instance(X182,X177)
| ~ s__instance(X180,X179)
| ~ s__instance(X181,X177)
| ~ s__instance(X182,X178)
| ~ s__instance(X179,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X178,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X177,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 != s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(X179,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(X178,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(X177,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(esk158_3(X177,X178,X179),X179)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(esk159_3(X177,X178,X179),X177)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(esk160_3(X177,X178,X179),X178)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( ~ s__instance(esk160_3(X177,X178,X179),X179)
| ~ s__instance(esk158_3(X177,X178,X179),X178)
| ~ s__instance(esk159_3(X177,X178,X179),X178)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( ~ s__instance(esk160_3(X177,X178,X179),X177)
| ~ s__instance(esk158_3(X177,X178,X179),X178)
| ~ s__instance(esk159_3(X177,X178,X179),X178)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_3496])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X27] : s__instance(X27,s__Entity),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_502]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,X3)
| s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
s__instance(X1,s__Entity),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( X1 = X2
| s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_11]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X169,X170] :
( ~ s__instance(X169,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X169,s__NullSet)
| ~ s__instance(X170,X169) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_3533])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| s__instance(X2,X3) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__NullSet)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
! [X49,X50,X51,X49,X50] :
( ( ~ s__disjoint(X49,X50)
| ~ s__instance(X50,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X49,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X51,X49)
| ~ s__instance(X51,X50) )
& ( s__instance(X50,s__SetOrClass)
| s__disjoint(X49,X50) )
& ( s__instance(X49,s__SetOrClass)
| s__disjoint(X49,X50) )
& ( s__instance(esk1_2(X49,X50),X49)
| s__disjoint(X49,X50) )
& ( s__instance(esk1_2(X49,X50),X50)
| s__disjoint(X49,X50) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_276])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X9,X10,X11] :
( ~ s__instance(X10,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X9,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X9,X10)
| ~ s__instance(X11,X9)
| s__instance(X11,X10) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__NullSet)
| ~ s__instance(X2,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,X3)
| s__instance(esk159_3(X3,X1,X2),X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__disjoint(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,s__NullSet)
| ~ s__instance(X3,esk159_3(s__NullSet,X1,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ s__disjoint(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X3,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X3,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_17]),c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
s__disjoint(s__AstronomicalBody,s__GeographicArea),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_5822]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_17]),c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
s__subclass(s__LocalizablePlace,s__GeographicArea),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_5829]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,esk159_3(s__NullSet,X3,X4))
| X3 = s__UnionFn(X4,s__NullSet) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__AstronomicalBody)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__GeographicArea) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__GeographicArea)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__LocalizablePlace) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
s__subclass(s__Planet28_1,s__AstronomicalBody),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,s__NullSet)
| X3 = X4 ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__AstronomicalBody)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__LocalizablePlace) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__AstronomicalBody)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Planet28_1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( X1 = X2
| X3 = X4
| X5 = X6 ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__LocalizablePlace)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Planet28_1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
s__instance(s__Object28_1,s__Planet28_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
( X1 = X2
| X3 = X4 ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_36])]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
~ s__instance(s__Object28_1,s__LocalizablePlace),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
X1 = X2,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_39])]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
~ s__instance(s__Object28_1,X1),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_42]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : CSR097+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 12:13:36 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 1.09/24.14 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.09/24.14 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.09/24.33 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.09/24.64 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.22/47.15 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.22/47.27 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.22/47.36 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.24/47.66 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.35/70.18 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.35/70.29 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.35/70.65 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.35/70.67 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.39/78.58 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_63dc1b1eb7d762c2f3686774d32795976f981b97 for 23 seconds:
% 1.39/78.58
% 1.39/78.58 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.39/78.58 # OLD status Res
% 1.39/78.58 # Preprocessing time : 0.386 s
% 1.39/78.58 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f6eb5f7f05126ea361481ae651a4823314e3d740 for 23 seconds:
% 1.39/78.58 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,02,20000,1.0)
% 1.39/78.58 # Preprocessing time : 0.101 s
% 1.39/78.58
% 1.39/78.58 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 1.39/78.58 # OLD status GaveUp
% 1.39/78.58 # Parsed axioms : 7227
% 1.39/78.58 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7190
% 1.39/78.58 # Initial clauses : 37
% 1.39/78.58 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Initial clauses in saturation : 37
% 1.39/78.58 # Processed clauses : 45
% 1.39/78.58 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # ...subsumed : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # ...remaining for further processing : 45
% 1.39/78.58 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 1.39/78.58 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Generated clauses : 16
% 1.39/78.58 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 8
% 1.39/78.58 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Paramodulations : 14
% 1.39/78.58 # Factorizations : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 1.39/78.58 # Current number of processed clauses : 44
% 1.39/78.58 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 13
% 1.39/78.58 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Non-unit-clauses : 31
% 1.39/78.58 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 1.39/78.58 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 93
% 1.39/78.58 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 19
% 1.39/78.58 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 42
% 1.39/78.58 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 1.39/78.58 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Termbank termtop insertions : 80399
% 1.39/78.58
% 1.39/78.58 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.39/78.58 # User time : 0.094 s
% 1.39/78.58 # System time : 0.009 s
% 1.39/78.58 # Total time : 0.103 s
% 1.39/78.58 # Maximum resident set size: 18520 pages
% 1.39/78.58 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_a172c605141d0894bf6fdc293a5220c6c2a32117 for 23 seconds:
% 1.39/78.58
% 1.39/78.58 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.39/78.58 # OLD status Res
% 1.39/78.58 # Preprocessing time : 0.265 s
% 1.39/78.58 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f8b0f932169414d689b89e2a8b18d4600533b975 for 23 seconds:
% 1.39/78.58
% 1.39/78.58 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.39/78.58 # OLD status Res
% 1.39/78.58 # Preprocessing time : 0.260 s
% 1.39/78.58 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_fc511518e5f98a6b2c7baef820b71b6d1abb3e55 for 23 seconds:
% 1.39/78.58 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,02,80,1.0)
% 1.39/78.58 # Preprocessing time : 0.163 s
% 1.39/78.58
% 1.39/78.58 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 1.39/78.58 # OLD status GaveUp
% 1.39/78.58 # Parsed axioms : 7227
% 1.39/78.58 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7209
% 1.39/78.58 # Initial clauses : 18
% 1.39/78.58 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Initial clauses in saturation : 18
% 1.39/78.58 # Processed clauses : 25
% 1.39/78.58 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # ...subsumed : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # ...remaining for further processing : 25
% 1.39/78.58 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 1.39/78.58 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Generated clauses : 15
% 1.39/78.58 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 7
% 1.39/78.58 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Paramodulations : 14
% 1.39/78.58 # Factorizations : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 1.39/78.58 # Current number of processed clauses : 24
% 1.39/78.58 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 10
% 1.39/78.58 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Non-unit-clauses : 14
% 1.39/78.58 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 1.39/78.58 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 14
% 1.39/78.58 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 1.39/78.58 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 1.39/78.58 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 1.39/78.58 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Termbank termtop insertions : 77896
% 1.39/78.58
% 1.39/78.58 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.39/78.58 # User time : 0.152 s
% 1.39/78.58 # System time : 0.012 s
% 1.39/78.58 # Total time : 0.164 s
% 1.39/78.58 # Maximum resident set size: 18532 pages
% 1.39/78.58 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_95b56b3f38545d2cfee43b45856d192a814b65d5 for 23 seconds:
% 1.39/78.58 # Preprocessing time : 0.309 s
% 1.39/78.58
% 1.39/78.58 # Proof found!
% 1.39/78.58 # SZS status Theorem
% 1.39/78.58 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.39/78.58 # Proof object total steps : 44
% 1.39/78.58 # Proof object clause steps : 30
% 1.39/78.58 # Proof object formula steps : 14
% 1.39/78.58 # Proof object conjectures : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Proof object clause conjectures : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Proof object formula conjectures : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Proof object initial clauses used : 10
% 1.39/78.58 # Proof object initial formulas used : 9
% 1.39/78.58 # Proof object generating inferences : 16
% 1.39/78.58 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 11
% 1.39/78.58 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 1.39/78.58 # Parsed axioms : 7227
% 1.39/78.58 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Initial clauses : 8418
% 1.39/78.58 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 63
% 1.39/78.58 # Initial clauses in saturation : 8355
% 1.39/78.58 # Processed clauses : 15872
% 1.39/78.58 # ...of these trivial : 920
% 1.39/78.58 # ...subsumed : 3367
% 1.39/78.58 # ...remaining for further processing : 11585
% 1.39/78.58 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 6447
% 1.39/78.58 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 338090
% 1.39/78.58 # Backward-subsumed : 2050
% 1.39/78.58 # Backward-rewritten : 2519
% 1.39/78.58 # Generated clauses : 804783
% 1.39/78.58 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 797316
% 1.39/78.58 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Paramodulations : 797876
% 1.39/78.58 # Factorizations : 55
% 1.39/78.58 # Equation resolutions : 6633
% 1.39/78.58 # Current number of processed clauses : 6791
% 1.39/78.58 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4086
% 1.39/78.58 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 1.39/78.58 # Negative unit clauses : 19
% 1.39/78.58 # Non-unit-clauses : 2685
% 1.39/78.58 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 29894
% 1.39/78.58 # ...number of literals in the above : 49045
% 1.39/78.58 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Current number of archived clauses : 4784
% 1.39/78.58 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3522025
% 1.39/78.58 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1480466
% 1.39/78.58 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4710
% 1.39/78.58 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1976925
% 1.39/78.58 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 8832
% 1.39/78.58 # BW rewrite match attempts : 9696
% 1.39/78.58 # BW rewrite match successes : 8873
% 1.39/78.58 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.39/78.58 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4464204
% 1.39/78.58
% 1.39/78.58 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.39/78.58 # User time : 7.814 s
% 1.39/78.58 # System time : 0.160 s
% 1.39/78.58 # Total time : 7.974 s
% 1.39/78.58 # Maximum resident set size: 203368 pages
% 1.39/93.24 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.39/93.26 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.39/93.26 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.39/93.26 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.39/93.26 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.39/93.26 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.39/93.26 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.39/93.27 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.39/93.27 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.39/93.27 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.39/93.27 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.39/93.28 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.39/93.28 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.39/93.28 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.39/93.28 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.39/93.28 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.39/93.28 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.39/93.94 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.39/93.96 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.39/93.96 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.39/93.96 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.39/93.96 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.39/93.96 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.39/93.97 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.39/93.97 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.39/93.97 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.39/93.97 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.39/93.98 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.39/93.98 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.39/93.98 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.39/93.98 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.39/93.99 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.39/93.99 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------