TSTP Solution File: CSR097+4 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR097+4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:18:30 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 23.90s 4.01s
% Output : CNFRefutation 23.90s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 22
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 55 ( 24 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 174 ( 26 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 45 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 191 ( 72 ~; 79 |; 28 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 9 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 24 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 18 ( 18 usr; 12 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 89 ( 32 sgn 34 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_3489,axiom,
! [X169,X170] :
( ! [X49] :
( ( s__instance(X170,s__Set)
& s__instance(X169,s__Set) )
=> ( s__element(X49,X170)
<=> s__element(X49,X169) ) )
=> X170 = X169 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_3489) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_3533,axiom,
! [X168] :
( s__instance(X168,s__SetOrClass)
=> ( s__instance(X168,s__NullSet)
=> ~ ? [X48] : s__instance(X48,X168) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_3533) ).
fof(local_8,axiom,
s__instance(s__Object28_1,s__Planet28_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_8) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_3496,axiom,
! [X171,X172,X173] :
( X172 = s__UnionFn(X173,X171)
<=> ! [X174,X175,X176] :
( ( s__instance(X173,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X172,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X171,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X174,X173)
& s__instance(X175,X171)
& s__instance(X176,X172) )
=> ( s__instance(X174,X172)
& s__instance(X175,X172)
& ( s__instance(X176,X173)
| s__instance(X176,X171) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_3496) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_276,axiom,
! [X9,X10] :
( s__disjoint(X9,X10)
<=> ! [X48] :
( ( s__instance(X10,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X9,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ~ ( s__instance(X48,X9)
& s__instance(X48,X10) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_276) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_1459,axiom,
s__disjoint(s__ObjectAttitude,s__PropositionalAttitude),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_1459) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_1476,axiom,
s__instance(s__wants__m,s__ObjectAttitude),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_1476) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_1506,axiom,
s__instance(s__knows__m,s__PropositionalAttitude),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_1506) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_1040,axiom,
! [X48] :
( ( s__instance(X48,s__Object)
& s__instance(X48,s__Attribute) )
=> ~ s__attribute(X48,X48) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_1040) ).
fof(prove_from_SUMO,conjecture,
~ s__attribute(s__Object28_1,s__Gaseous),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO) ).
fof(local_6,axiom,
s__instance(s__Gaseous,s__Attribute),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_6) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X6419,X6420] :
( ( s__instance(X6420,s__Set)
| X6420 = X6419 )
& ( s__instance(X6419,s__Set)
| X6420 = X6419 )
& ( ~ s__element(esk157_2(X6419,X6420),X6420)
| ~ s__element(esk157_2(X6419,X6420),X6419)
| X6420 = X6419 )
& ( s__element(esk157_2(X6419,X6420),X6420)
| s__element(esk157_2(X6419,X6420),X6419)
| X6420 = X6419 ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_3489])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X6434,X6435] :
( ~ s__instance(X6434,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X6434,s__NullSet)
| ~ s__instance(X6435,X6434) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_3533])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
s__instance(s__Object28_1,s__Planet28_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__Set)
| X2 = X1 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__NullSet)
| ~ s__instance(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( s__instance(s__Planet28_1,s__Set)
| s__instance(s__Object28_1,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( s__instance(s__Planet28_1,s__Set)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object28_1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_16]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
! [X6422,X6423,X6424,X6425,X6426,X6427,X6428,X6429,X6430] :
( ( s__instance(X6425,X6423)
| ~ s__instance(X6425,X6424)
| ~ s__instance(X6426,X6422)
| ~ s__instance(X6427,X6423)
| ~ s__instance(X6424,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X6423,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X6422,s__SetOrClass)
| X6423 != s__UnionFn(X6424,X6422) )
& ( s__instance(X6426,X6423)
| ~ s__instance(X6425,X6424)
| ~ s__instance(X6426,X6422)
| ~ s__instance(X6427,X6423)
| ~ s__instance(X6424,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X6423,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X6422,s__SetOrClass)
| X6423 != s__UnionFn(X6424,X6422) )
& ( s__instance(X6427,X6424)
| s__instance(X6427,X6422)
| ~ s__instance(X6425,X6424)
| ~ s__instance(X6426,X6422)
| ~ s__instance(X6427,X6423)
| ~ s__instance(X6424,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X6423,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X6422,s__SetOrClass)
| X6423 != s__UnionFn(X6424,X6422) )
& ( s__instance(X6430,s__SetOrClass)
| X6429 = s__UnionFn(X6430,X6428) )
& ( s__instance(X6429,s__SetOrClass)
| X6429 = s__UnionFn(X6430,X6428) )
& ( s__instance(X6428,s__SetOrClass)
| X6429 = s__UnionFn(X6430,X6428) )
& ( s__instance(esk158_3(X6428,X6429,X6430),X6430)
| X6429 = s__UnionFn(X6430,X6428) )
& ( s__instance(esk159_3(X6428,X6429,X6430),X6428)
| X6429 = s__UnionFn(X6430,X6428) )
& ( s__instance(esk160_3(X6428,X6429,X6430),X6429)
| X6429 = s__UnionFn(X6430,X6428) )
& ( ~ s__instance(esk160_3(X6428,X6429,X6430),X6430)
| ~ s__instance(esk158_3(X6428,X6429,X6430),X6429)
| ~ s__instance(esk159_3(X6428,X6429,X6430),X6429)
| X6429 = s__UnionFn(X6430,X6428) )
& ( ~ s__instance(esk160_3(X6428,X6429,X6430),X6428)
| ~ s__instance(esk158_3(X6428,X6429,X6430),X6429)
| ~ s__instance(esk159_3(X6428,X6429,X6430),X6429)
| X6429 = s__UnionFn(X6430,X6428) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_3496])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
s__instance(s__Planet28_1,s__Set),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| X2 = s__UnionFn(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
s__instance(X1,s__Set),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( X1 = X2
| s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| s__instance(X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
fof(c_0_24,plain,
! [X1512,X1513,X1514,X1515,X1516] :
( ( ~ s__disjoint(X1512,X1513)
| ~ s__instance(X1513,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1512,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1514,X1512)
| ~ s__instance(X1514,X1513) )
& ( s__instance(X1516,s__SetOrClass)
| s__disjoint(X1515,X1516) )
& ( s__instance(X1515,s__SetOrClass)
| s__disjoint(X1515,X1516) )
& ( s__instance(esk1_2(X1515,X1516),X1515)
| s__disjoint(X1515,X1516) )
& ( s__instance(esk1_2(X1515,X1516),X1516)
| s__disjoint(X1515,X1516) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_276])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ s__disjoint(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X3,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__NullSet)
| ~ s__instance(X2,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_25])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( s__instance(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)
| s__disjoint(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( ~ s__disjoint(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X3,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_25]),c_0_25])]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
s__disjoint(s__ObjectAttitude,s__PropositionalAttitude),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_1459]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( s__disjoint(s__NullSet,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X2,esk1_2(s__NullSet,X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( s__instance(esk158_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| X2 = s__UnionFn(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__PropositionalAttitude)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__ObjectAttitude) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
s__instance(s__wants__m,s__ObjectAttitude),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_1476]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(esk1_2(s__NullSet,X2),X3)
| s__disjoint(s__NullSet,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
~ s__instance(s__wants__m,s__PropositionalAttitude),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( X1 = X2
| s__disjoint(s__NullSet,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( s__disjoint(s__NullSet,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__PropositionalAttitude) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
s__instance(s__knows__m,s__PropositionalAttitude),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_1506]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
s__disjoint(s__NullSet,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__NullSet)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_40]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(s__NullSet,X2)
| ~ s__instance(esk158_3(X2,X1,s__NullSet),X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_32]) ).
fof(c_0_43,plain,
! [X48] :
( ( s__instance(X48,s__Object)
& s__instance(X48,s__Attribute) )
=> ~ s__attribute(X48,X48) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_1040]) ).
fof(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
s__attribute(s__Object28_1,s__Gaseous),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO])]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
X1 = s__UnionFn(s__NullSet,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_21]) ).
fof(c_0_46,plain,
! [X2615] :
( ~ s__instance(X2615,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X2615,s__Attribute)
| ~ s__attribute(X2615,X2615) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_43])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
s__attribute(s__Object28_1,s__Gaseous),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_44]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,plain,
X1 = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_45]) ).
cnf(c_0_49,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Attribute)
| ~ s__attribute(X1,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_46]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
s__attribute(X1,s__Gaseous),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]) ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
s__instance(s__Gaseous,s__Attribute),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Gaseous,s__Object),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50]),c_0_51])]) ).
cnf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Gaseous,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_48]) ).
cnf(c_0_54,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_53]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : CSR097+4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun May 19 01:00:08 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 23.90/4.01 # Version: 3.1.0
% 23.90/4.01 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 23.90/4.01 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 23.90/4.01 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 23.90/4.01 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 23.90/4.01 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 23.90/4.01 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 23.90/4.01 # G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 11021 completed with status 0
% 23.90/4.01 # Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 23.90/4.01 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 23.90/4.01 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 23.90/4.01 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 23.90/4.01 # No SInE strategy applied
% 23.90/4.01 # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 23.90/4.01 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 23.90/4.01 # Starting C07_19_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 811s (1) cores
% 23.90/4.01 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 23.90/4.01 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 23.90/4.01 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 23.90/4.01 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 23.90/4.01 # G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 11029 completed with status 0
% 23.90/4.01 # Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 23.90/4.01 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 23.90/4.01 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 23.90/4.01 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 23.90/4.01 # No SInE strategy applied
% 23.90/4.01 # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 23.90/4.01 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 23.90/4.01 # Starting C07_19_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 811s (1) cores
% 23.90/4.01 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 23.90/4.01 # Preprocessing time : 0.099 s
% 23.90/4.01 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 23.90/4.01
% 23.90/4.01 # Proof found!
% 23.90/4.01 # SZS status Theorem
% 23.90/4.01 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 23.90/4.01 # Parsed axioms : 7227
% 23.90/4.01 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 23.90/4.01 # Initial clauses : 8418
% 23.90/4.01 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 63
% 23.90/4.01 # Initial clauses in saturation : 8355
% 23.90/4.01 # Processed clauses : 17517
% 23.90/4.01 # ...of these trivial : 925
% 23.90/4.01 # ...subsumed : 364
% 23.90/4.01 # ...remaining for further processing : 16228
% 23.90/4.01 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 63
% 23.90/4.01 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 23.90/4.01 # Backward-subsumed : 1095
% 23.90/4.01 # Backward-rewritten : 1456
% 23.90/4.01 # Generated clauses : 159964
% 23.90/4.01 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 156070
% 23.90/4.01 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 23.90/4.01 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 680
% 23.90/4.01 # Paramodulations : 159849
% 23.90/4.01 # Factorizations : 3
% 23.90/4.01 # NegExts : 0
% 23.90/4.01 # Equation resolutions : 78
% 23.90/4.01 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 23.90/4.01 # Total rewrite steps : 6463
% 23.90/4.01 # ...of those cached : 3367
% 23.90/4.01 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 23.90/4.01 # Propositional check models : 0
% 23.90/4.01 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 23.90/4.01 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 23.90/4.01 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 23.90/4.01 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 23.90/4.01 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 23.90/4.01 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 23.90/4.01 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 23.90/4.01 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 23.90/4.01 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 23.90/4.01 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 23.90/4.01 # Current number of processed clauses : 5476
% 23.90/4.01 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3947
% 23.90/4.01 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 23.90/4.01 # Negative unit clauses : 15
% 23.90/4.01 # Non-unit-clauses : 1513
% 23.90/4.01 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 137405
% 23.90/4.01 # ...number of literals in the above : 279093
% 23.90/4.01 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 23.90/4.01 # Current number of archived clauses : 10744
% 23.90/4.01 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3167225
% 23.90/4.01 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 889554
% 23.90/4.01 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1060
% 23.90/4.01 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 246916
% 23.90/4.01 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 10095
% 23.90/4.01 # BW rewrite match attempts : 33427
% 23.90/4.01 # BW rewrite match successes : 11022
% 23.90/4.01 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 23.90/4.01 # Condensation successes : 0
% 23.90/4.01 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1428424
% 23.90/4.01 # Search garbage collected termcells : 89723
% 23.90/4.01
% 23.90/4.01 # -------------------------------------------------
% 23.90/4.01 # User time : 3.034 s
% 23.90/4.01 # System time : 0.118 s
% 23.90/4.01 # Total time : 3.152 s
% 23.90/4.01 # Maximum resident set size: 29648 pages
% 23.90/4.01
% 23.90/4.01 # -------------------------------------------------
% 23.90/4.01 # User time : 13.406 s
% 23.90/4.01 # System time : 0.278 s
% 23.90/4.01 # Total time : 13.683 s
% 23.90/4.01 # Maximum resident set size: 9060 pages
% 23.90/4.01 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------