TSTP Solution File: CSR094+3 by nanoCoP---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem  : CSR094+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : nanocop.sh %s %d

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:04:31 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unknown 147.78s 147.60s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : CSR094+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Fri May 19 00:32:27 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 10.59/10.47  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 10.59/10.47  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 10.59/10.47  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 21.60/21.29  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 21.60/21.29  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 21.60/21.29  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 33.05/33.02  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 33.05/33.02  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 33.05/33.02  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 43.27/43.33  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 43.27/43.33  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 43.27/43.33  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 47.49/47.93  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 47.49/47.93  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 47.49/47.93  Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 58.60/58.64  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 58.60/58.64  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 58.60/58.64  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 69.48/69.84  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 69.48/69.84  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 69.48/69.84  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 80.10/81.00  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 80.10/81.00  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 80.10/81.00  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 94.49/95.07  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 94.49/95.07  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 94.49/95.07  Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 147.70/146.78  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 147.70/146.78  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 147.70/146.78  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 147.78/147.59  Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------