TSTP Solution File: CSR094+3 by nanoCoP---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem : CSR094+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:04:31 EDT 2023
% Result : Unknown 147.78s 147.60s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR094+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri May 19 00:32:27 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 10.59/10.47 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 10.59/10.47 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 10.59/10.47 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 21.60/21.29 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 21.60/21.29 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 21.60/21.29 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 33.05/33.02 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 33.05/33.02 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 33.05/33.02 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 43.27/43.33 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 43.27/43.33 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 43.27/43.33 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 47.49/47.93 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 47.49/47.93 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 47.49/47.93 Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 58.60/58.64 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 58.60/58.64 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 58.60/58.64 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 69.48/69.84 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 69.48/69.84 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 69.48/69.84 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 80.10/81.00 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 80.10/81.00 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 80.10/81.00 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 94.49/95.07 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 94.49/95.07 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 94.49/95.07 Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 147.70/146.78 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 147.70/146.78 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 147.70/146.78 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 147.78/147.59 Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------