TSTP Solution File: CSR094+3 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : CSR094+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 07:36:09 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 111.80s 110.73s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 111.80s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   40 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   40 (  18   ~;  15   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (   2 sgn  10   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_26636,axiom,
    ! [X1,X15,X13] :
      ( ( s__instance(X15,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) )
     => ( ( s__subclass(X1,X15)
          & s__instance(X13,X1) )
       => s__instance(X13,X15) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RLf2jskjY7/E---3.1_27263.p',kb_SUMO_26636) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_26635,axiom,
    ! [X1,X15] :
      ( s__subclass(X1,X15)
     => ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X15,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RLf2jskjY7/E---3.1_27263.p',kb_SUMO_26635) ).

fof(prove_from_ALL,conjecture,
    s__instance(s__Rover24_1,s__CorpuscularObject),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RLf2jskjY7/E---3.1_27263.p',prove_from_ALL) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_71535,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__Canine,s__CorpuscularObject),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RLf2jskjY7/E---3.1_27263.p',kb_SUMO_71535) ).

fof(local_1,axiom,
    s__instance(s__Rover24_1,s__Canine),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RLf2jskjY7/E---3.1_27263.p',local_1) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X2350,X2351,X2352] :
      ( ~ s__instance(X2351,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__instance(X2350,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__subclass(X2350,X2351)
      | ~ s__instance(X2352,X2350)
      | s__instance(X2352,X2351) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26636])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X2348,X2349] :
      ( ( s__instance(X2348,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__subclass(X2348,X2349) )
      & ( s__instance(X2349,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__subclass(X2348,X2349) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26635])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( s__instance(X3,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__instance(s__Rover24_1,s__CorpuscularObject),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_ALL])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
    | ~ s__subclass(X3,X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Canine,s__CorpuscularObject),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_71535]) ).

fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__instance(s__Rover24_1,s__CorpuscularObject),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__CorpuscularObject)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__Canine) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    s__instance(s__Rover24_1,s__Canine),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__instance(s__Rover24_1,s__CorpuscularObject),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem    : CSR094+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.31  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 15:24:53 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 107.17/107.77  Running first-order model finding
% 107.17/107.77  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RLf2jskjY7/E---3.1_27263.p
% 111.80/110.73  # Version: 3.1.0
% 111.80/110.73  # Preprocessing class: FLLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 111.80/110.73  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 298 seconds (2384 total)
% 111.80/110.73  # Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 1490s (5) cores
% 111.80/110.73  # Starting new_bool_3 with 298s (1) cores
% 111.80/110.73  # Starting new_bool_1 with 298s (1) cores
% 111.80/110.73  # Starting sh5l with 298s (1) cores
% 111.80/110.73  # new_bool_3 with pid 29542 completed with status 0
% 111.80/110.73  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 111.80/110.73  # Preprocessing class: FLLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 111.80/110.73  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 298 seconds (2384 total)
% 111.80/110.73  # Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 1490s (5) cores
% 111.80/110.73  # Starting new_bool_3 with 298s (1) cores
% 111.80/110.73  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 111.80/110.73  # Search class: FGHSS-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 111.80/110.73  # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 111.80/110.73  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 298 seconds (298 total)
% 111.80/110.73  # Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y with 127s (1) cores
% 111.80/110.73  # G-E--_200_B02_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y with pid 29576 completed with status 0
% 111.80/110.73  # Result found by G-E--_200_B02_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y
% 111.80/110.73  # Preprocessing class: FLLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 111.80/110.73  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 298 seconds (2384 total)
% 111.80/110.73  # Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 1490s (5) cores
% 111.80/110.73  # Starting new_bool_3 with 298s (1) cores
% 111.80/110.73  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 111.80/110.73  # Search class: FGHSS-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 111.80/110.73  # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 111.80/110.73  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 298 seconds (298 total)
% 111.80/110.73  # Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y with 127s (1) cores
% 111.80/110.73  # Preprocessing time       : 0.012 s
% 111.80/110.73  
% 111.80/110.73  # Proof found!
% 111.80/110.73  # SZS status Theorem
% 111.80/110.73  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 111.80/110.73  # Parsed axioms                        : 145103
% 111.80/110.73  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 144876
% 111.80/110.73  # Initial clauses                      : 234
% 111.80/110.73  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 5
% 111.80/110.73  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 229
% 111.80/110.73  # Processed clauses                    : 833
% 111.80/110.73  # ...of these trivial                  : 346
% 111.80/110.73  # ...subsumed                          : 6
% 111.80/110.73  # ...remaining for further processing  : 481
% 111.80/110.73  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 111.80/110.73  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 111.80/110.73  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 111.80/110.73  # Backward-rewritten                   : 9
% 111.80/110.73  # Generated clauses                    : 998
% 111.80/110.73  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 968
% 111.80/110.73  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 111.80/110.73  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 11
% 111.80/110.73  # Paramodulations                      : 997
% 111.80/110.73  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 111.80/110.73  # NegExts                              : 0
% 111.80/110.73  # Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 111.80/110.73  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 111.80/110.73  # Total rewrite steps                  : 392
% 111.80/110.73  # ...of those cached                   : 354
% 111.80/110.73  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 111.80/110.73  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 111.80/110.73  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 111.80/110.73  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 111.80/110.73  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 111.80/110.73  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 111.80/110.73  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 111.80/110.73  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 111.80/110.73  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 111.80/110.73  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 111.80/110.73  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 111.80/110.73  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 111.80/110.73  # Current number of processed clauses  : 471
% 111.80/110.73  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 239
% 111.80/110.73  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 111.80/110.73  #    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 111.80/110.73  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 228
% 111.80/110.73  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 362
% 111.80/110.73  # ...number of literals in the above   : 726
% 111.80/110.73  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 111.80/110.73  # Current number of archived clauses   : 9
% 111.80/110.73  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5529
% 111.80/110.73  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5319
% 111.80/110.73  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 17
% 111.80/110.73  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 87
% 111.80/110.73  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 111.80/110.73  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 10
% 111.80/110.73  # BW rewrite match successes           : 9
% 111.80/110.73  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 111.80/110.73  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 111.80/110.73  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1019331
% 111.80/110.73  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 459511
% 111.80/110.73  
% 111.80/110.73  # -------------------------------------------------
% 111.80/110.73  # User time                : 0.402 s
% 111.80/110.73  # System time              : 0.144 s
% 111.80/110.73  # Total time               : 0.546 s
% 111.80/110.73  # Maximum resident set size: 174924 pages
% 111.80/110.73  
% 111.80/110.73  # -------------------------------------------------
% 111.80/110.73  # User time                : 2.634 s
% 111.80/110.73  # System time              : 0.245 s
% 111.80/110.73  # Total time               : 2.879 s
% 111.80/110.73  # Maximum resident set size: 100336 pages
% 111.80/110.73  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------