TSTP Solution File: CSR093+3 by nanoCoP---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem  : CSR093+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : nanocop.sh %s %d

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:04:31 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unknown 148.46s 148.82s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : CSR093+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Fri May 19 00:32:14 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 11.43/11.20  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 11.43/11.20  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 11.43/11.20  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 22.40/22.29  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 22.40/22.29  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 22.40/22.29  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 33.44/33.78  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 33.44/33.78  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 33.44/33.78  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 44.59/45.30  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 44.59/45.30  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 44.59/45.30  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 48.94/50.12  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 48.94/50.12  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 48.94/50.12  Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 59.98/60.77  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 59.98/60.77  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 59.98/60.77  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 70.98/72.13  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 70.98/72.13  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 70.98/72.13  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 81.87/83.48  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 81.87/83.48  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 81.87/83.48  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 95.73/97.69  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 95.73/97.69  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 95.73/97.69  Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 148.42/148.47  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 148.42/148.47  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 148.42/148.47  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 148.46/148.82  Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------