TSTP Solution File: CSR092+3 by nanoCoP---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem  : CSR092+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : nanocop.sh %s %d

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:04:30 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unknown 150.69s 149.67s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : CSR092+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.03/0.14  % Command  : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Fri May 19 00:12:53 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 11.31/11.12  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 11.31/11.12  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 11.31/11.12  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 22.23/22.23  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 22.23/22.23  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 22.23/22.23  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 32.62/33.11  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 32.62/33.11  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 32.62/33.11  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 43.01/43.56  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 43.01/43.56  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 43.01/43.56  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 47.02/47.81  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 47.02/47.81  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 47.02/47.81  Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 57.66/58.27  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 57.66/58.27  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 57.66/58.27  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 70.14/70.55  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 70.14/70.55  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 70.14/70.55  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 82.82/82.95  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 82.82/82.95  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 82.82/82.95  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 97.32/97.17  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 97.32/97.17  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 97.32/97.17  Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 150.58/148.90  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 150.58/148.90  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 150.58/148.90  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 150.69/149.67  Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------