TSTP Solution File: CSR090+3 by nanoCoP---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem : CSR090+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:04:29 EDT 2023
% Result : Unknown 149.32s 151.16s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : CSR090+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.04/0.12 % Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Fri May 19 00:41:47 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 11.15/10.90 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 11.15/10.90 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 11.15/10.90 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 22.02/22.19 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 22.02/22.19 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 22.02/22.19 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 32.63/33.38 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 32.63/33.38 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 32.63/33.38 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 43.58/44.01 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 43.58/44.01 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 43.58/44.01 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 48.00/49.21 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 48.00/49.21 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 48.00/49.21 Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 59.19/60.84 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 59.19/60.84 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 59.19/60.84 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 70.27/72.21 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 70.27/72.21 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 70.27/72.21 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 81.26/83.54 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 81.26/83.54 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 81.26/83.54 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 95.47/98.02 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 95.47/98.02 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 95.47/98.02 Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 149.19/150.44 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 149.19/150.44 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 149.19/150.44 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 149.32/151.15 Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------