TSTP Solution File: CSR090+3 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : CSR090+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:02:31 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 93.63s 118.80s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 93.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (  20 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   72 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   69 (  30   ~;  27   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   6 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   31 (   2 sgn  16   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_26636,axiom,
    ! [X1,X15,X13] :
      ( ( s__instance(X15,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) )
     => ( ( s__subclass(X1,X15)
          & s__instance(X13,X1) )
       => s__instance(X13,X15) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_26636) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_26635,axiom,
    ! [X1,X15] :
      ( s__subclass(X1,X15)
     => ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X15,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_26635) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_27777,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__TimeInterval,s__TimePosition),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_27777) ).

fof(prove_from_ALL,conjecture,
    s__temporalPart(s__Time17_1,s__Time17_3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_ALL) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_28419,axiom,
    ! [X1034,X1035,X1097] :
      ( ( s__instance(X1097,s__TimePosition)
        & s__instance(X1035,s__TimePosition)
        & s__instance(X1034,s__TimePosition) )
     => ( ( s__temporalPart(X1034,X1035)
          & s__temporalPart(X1035,X1097) )
       => s__temporalPart(X1034,X1097) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_28419) ).

fof(local_2,axiom,
    s__instance(s__Time17_2,s__TimeInterval),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',local_2) ).

fof(local_3,axiom,
    s__instance(s__Time17_3,s__TimeInterval),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',local_3) ).

fof(local_5,axiom,
    s__temporalPart(s__Time17_2,s__Time17_3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',local_5) ).

fof(local_1,axiom,
    s__instance(s__Time17_1,s__TimeInterval),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',local_1) ).

fof(local_4,axiom,
    s__temporalPart(s__Time17_1,s__Time17_2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',local_4) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X16,X17,X18] :
      ( ~ s__instance(X17,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__instance(X16,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__subclass(X16,X17)
      | ~ s__instance(X18,X16)
      | s__instance(X18,X17) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26636])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X16,X17] :
      ( ( s__instance(X16,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__subclass(X16,X17) )
      & ( s__instance(X17,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__subclass(X16,X17) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26635])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
    | ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
    | ~ s__subclass(X3,X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    s__subclass(s__TimeInterval,s__TimePosition),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27777]) ).

fof(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__temporalPart(s__Time17_1,s__Time17_3),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_ALL]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X1098,X1099,X1100] :
      ( ~ s__instance(X1100,s__TimePosition)
      | ~ s__instance(X1099,s__TimePosition)
      | ~ s__instance(X1098,s__TimePosition)
      | ~ s__temporalPart(X1098,X1099)
      | ~ s__temporalPart(X1099,X1100)
      | s__temporalPart(X1098,X1100) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_28419])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimeInterval) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    s__instance(s__Time17_2,s__TimeInterval),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    s__instance(s__Time17_3,s__TimeInterval),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_3]) ).

fof(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__temporalPart(s__Time17_1,s__Time17_3),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( s__temporalPart(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(X1,X3)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(X3,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__TimePosition) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    s__temporalPart(s__Time17_2,s__Time17_3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    s__instance(s__Time17_2,s__TimePosition),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    s__instance(s__Time17_3,s__TimePosition),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    s__instance(s__Time17_1,s__TimeInterval),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__temporalPart(s__Time17_1,s__Time17_3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( s__temporalPart(X1,s__Time17_3)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(X1,s__Time17_2)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    s__temporalPart(s__Time17_1,s__Time17_2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    s__instance(s__Time17_1,s__TimePosition),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30]),c_0_31])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : CSR090+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 13:59:30 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 93.62/116.65  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 93.62/116.66  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 93.63/118.33  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 93.63/118.80  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_63dc1b1eb7d762c2f3686774d32795976f981b97 for 23 seconds:
% 93.63/118.80  
% 93.63/118.80  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 93.63/118.80  # OLD status Res
% 93.63/118.80  # Preprocessing time       : 7.425 s
% 93.63/118.80  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f6eb5f7f05126ea361481ae651a4823314e3d740 for 23 seconds:
% 93.63/118.80  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,02,20000,1.0)
% 93.63/118.80  # Preprocessing time       : 1.648 s
% 93.63/118.80  
% 93.63/118.80  # Proof found!
% 93.63/118.80  # SZS status Theorem
% 93.63/118.80  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 93.63/118.80  # Proof object total steps             : 33
% 93.63/118.80  # Proof object clause steps            : 18
% 93.63/118.80  # Proof object formula steps           : 15
% 93.63/118.80  # Proof object conjectures             : 5
% 93.63/118.80  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
% 93.63/118.80  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 93.63/118.80  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 11
% 93.63/118.80  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 10
% 93.63/118.80  # Proof object generating inferences   : 6
% 93.63/118.80  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 8
% 93.63/118.80  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 93.63/118.80  # Parsed axioms                        : 145107
% 93.63/118.80  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 144953
% 93.63/118.80  # Initial clauses                      : 227
% 93.63/118.80  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 9
% 93.63/118.80  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 218
% 93.63/118.80  # Processed clauses                    : 691
% 93.63/118.80  # ...of these trivial                  : 41
% 93.63/118.80  # ...subsumed                          : 141
% 93.63/118.80  # ...remaining for further processing  : 509
% 93.63/118.80  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 93.63/118.80  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 93.63/118.80  # Backward-subsumed                    : 7
% 93.63/118.80  # Backward-rewritten                   : 41
% 93.63/118.80  # Generated clauses                    : 2115
% 93.63/118.80  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 2058
% 93.63/118.80  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 22
% 93.63/118.80  # Paramodulations                      : 2113
% 93.63/118.80  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 93.63/118.80  # Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 93.63/118.80  # Current number of processed clauses  : 460
% 93.63/118.80  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 59
% 93.63/118.80  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 93.63/118.80  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 93.63/118.80  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 400
% 93.63/118.80  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 225
% 93.63/118.80  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1205
% 93.63/118.80  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 93.63/118.80  # Current number of archived clauses   : 48
% 93.63/118.80  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 28970
% 93.63/118.80  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15435
% 93.63/118.80  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 168
% 93.63/118.80  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 761
% 93.63/118.80  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 93.63/118.80  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 69
% 93.63/118.80  # BW rewrite match successes           : 30
% 93.63/118.80  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 93.63/118.80  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 93.63/118.80  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1051232
% 93.63/118.80  
% 93.63/118.80  # -------------------------------------------------
% 93.63/118.80  # User time                : 1.613 s
% 93.63/118.80  # System time              : 0.087 s
% 93.63/118.80  # Total time               : 1.700 s
% 93.63/118.80  # Maximum resident set size: 198076 pages
% 93.63/125.74  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 93.63/125.76  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 93.63/125.76  eprover: No such file or directory
% 93.63/125.77  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 93.63/125.77  eprover: No such file or directory
% 93.63/125.78  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 93.63/125.78  eprover: No such file or directory
% 93.63/125.78  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 93.63/125.78  eprover: No such file or directory
% 93.63/125.79  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 93.63/125.79  eprover: No such file or directory
% 93.63/125.79  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 93.63/125.79  eprover: No such file or directory
% 93.63/125.80  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 93.63/125.80  eprover: No such file or directory
% 93.63/125.81  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 93.63/125.81  eprover: No such file or directory
% 93.63/125.81  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 93.63/125.81  eprover: No such file or directory
% 93.63/125.82  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 93.63/125.82  eprover: No such file or directory
% 93.63/139.68  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 93.63/139.71  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 93.63/139.71  eprover: No such file or directory
% 93.63/139.72  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 93.63/139.72  eprover: No such file or directory
% 93.63/139.73  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 93.63/139.73  eprover: No such file or directory
% 93.63/139.73  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 93.63/139.73  eprover: No such file or directory
% 93.63/139.74  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 93.63/139.74  eprover: No such file or directory
% 93.63/139.74  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 93.63/139.74  eprover: No such file or directory
% 93.63/139.75  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 93.63/139.75  eprover: No such file or directory
% 93.63/139.75  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 93.63/139.75  eprover: No such file or directory
% 93.63/139.76  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 93.63/139.76  eprover: No such file or directory
% 93.63/139.77  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 93.63/139.77  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------