TSTP Solution File: CSR090+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR090+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:44 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 15.21s 4.19s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 15.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   30 (  15 unt;   0 nHn;  30 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   76 (   0 equ;  48 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   6 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_841,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
    | ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ox4iccse/lgb.p',i_0_841) ).

cnf(i_0_756,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ox4iccse/lgb.p',i_0_756) ).

cnf(i_0_757,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ox4iccse/lgb.p',i_0_757) ).

cnf(i_0_1941,plain,
    s__subclass(s__TimeInterval,s__TimePosition),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ox4iccse/lgb.p',i_0_1941) ).

cnf(i_0_92,plain,
    ( s__temporalPart(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(X1,X3)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(X3,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__TimePosition) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ox4iccse/lgb.p',i_0_92) ).

cnf(i_0_2681,plain,
    s__instance(s__Time17_2,s__TimeInterval),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ox4iccse/lgb.p',i_0_2681) ).

cnf(i_0_2684,plain,
    s__temporalPart(s__Time17_2,s__Time17_3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ox4iccse/lgb.p',i_0_2684) ).

cnf(i_0_2682,plain,
    s__instance(s__Time17_3,s__TimeInterval),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ox4iccse/lgb.p',i_0_2682) ).

cnf(i_0_2683,plain,
    s__temporalPart(s__Time17_1,s__Time17_2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ox4iccse/lgb.p',i_0_2683) ).

cnf(i_0_2680,plain,
    s__instance(s__Time17_1,s__TimeInterval),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ox4iccse/lgb.p',i_0_2680) ).

cnf(i_0_2685,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__temporalPart(s__Time17_1,s__Time17_3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ox4iccse/lgb.p',i_0_2685) ).

cnf(c_0_2697,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
    | ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
    i_0_841 ).

cnf(c_0_2698,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_756 ).

cnf(c_0_2699,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_757 ).

cnf(c_0_2700,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,X3) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_2697,c_0_2698]),c_0_2699]) ).

cnf(c_0_2701,plain,
    s__subclass(s__TimeInterval,s__TimePosition),
    i_0_1941 ).

cnf(c_0_2702,plain,
    ( s__temporalPart(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(X1,X3)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(X3,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__TimePosition) ),
    i_0_92 ).

cnf(c_0_2703,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimeInterval) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2700,c_0_2701]) ).

cnf(c_0_2704,plain,
    ( s__temporalPart(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(X1,X3)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(X3,s__TimeInterval) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2702,c_0_2703]) ).

cnf(c_0_2705,plain,
    ( s__temporalPart(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(X1,X3)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(X3,s__TimeInterval)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__TimeInterval) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2704,c_0_2703]) ).

cnf(c_0_2706,plain,
    ( s__temporalPart(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(X1,X3)
    | ~ s__instance(X3,s__TimeInterval)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__TimeInterval)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimeInterval) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2705,c_0_2703]) ).

cnf(c_0_2707,plain,
    s__instance(s__Time17_2,s__TimeInterval),
    i_0_2681 ).

cnf(c_0_2708,plain,
    ( s__temporalPart(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(s__Time17_2,X2)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(X1,s__Time17_2)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__TimeInterval)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimeInterval) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2706,c_0_2707]) ).

cnf(c_0_2709,plain,
    s__temporalPart(s__Time17_2,s__Time17_3),
    i_0_2684 ).

cnf(c_0_2710,plain,
    s__instance(s__Time17_3,s__TimeInterval),
    i_0_2682 ).

cnf(c_0_2711,plain,
    ( s__temporalPart(X1,s__Time17_3)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(X1,s__Time17_2)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimeInterval) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2708,c_0_2709]),c_0_2710])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2712,plain,
    s__temporalPart(s__Time17_1,s__Time17_2),
    i_0_2683 ).

cnf(c_0_2713,plain,
    s__instance(s__Time17_1,s__TimeInterval),
    i_0_2680 ).

cnf(c_0_2714,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__temporalPart(s__Time17_1,s__Time17_3),
    i_0_2685 ).

cnf(c_0_2715,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2711,c_0_2712]),c_0_2713])]),c_0_2714]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem  : CSR090+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 13:35:24 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.47  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.47/0.69  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/0.69  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.47/0.69  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.47/0.69  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 15.21/4.19  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 15.21/4.19  # SinE strategy is gf600_h_gu_R05_F100_L20000
% 15.21/4.19  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 15.21/4.19  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 15.21/4.19  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 15.21/4.19  #
% 15.21/4.19  # Preprocessing time       : 0.036 s
% 15.21/4.19  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 15.21/4.19  
% 15.21/4.19  # Proof found!
% 15.21/4.19  # SZS status Theorem
% 15.21/4.19  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 15.21/4.19  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 15.21/4.19  
% 15.21/4.19  # -------------------------------------------------
% 15.21/4.19  # User time                : 0.687 s
% 15.21/4.19  # System time              : 0.021 s
% 15.21/4.19  # Total time               : 0.708 s
% 15.21/4.19  # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 15.21/4.19  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------