TSTP Solution File: CSR090+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR090+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:02:31 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.89s 3.07s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.89s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 33 ( 18 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 77 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 82 ( 38 ~; 32 |; 7 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 6 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 31 ( 2 sgn 16 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_SUMO,conjecture,
s__temporalPart(s__Time17_1,s__Time17_3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',prove_from_SUMO) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_1262,axiom,
! [X4,X5,X105] :
( ( s__instance(X105,s__TimePosition)
& s__instance(X5,s__TimePosition)
& s__instance(X4,s__TimePosition) )
=> ( ( s__temporalPart(X4,X5)
& s__temporalPart(X5,X105) )
=> s__temporalPart(X4,X105) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_1262) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_27,axiom,
! [X6,X7,X8] :
( ( s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__subclass(X6,X7)
& s__instance(X8,X6) )
=> s__instance(X8,X7) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_27) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26,axiom,
! [X6,X7] :
( s__subclass(X6,X7)
=> ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_26) ).
fof(local_5,axiom,
s__temporalPart(s__Time17_2,s__Time17_3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',local_5) ).
fof(local_4,axiom,
s__temporalPart(s__Time17_1,s__Time17_2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',local_4) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_908,axiom,
s__subclass(s__TimeInterval,s__TimePosition),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_908) ).
fof(local_3,axiom,
s__instance(s__Time17_3,s__TimeInterval),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',local_3) ).
fof(local_2,axiom,
s__instance(s__Time17_2,s__TimeInterval),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',local_2) ).
fof(local_1,axiom,
s__instance(s__Time17_1,s__TimeInterval),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',local_1) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ s__temporalPart(s__Time17_1,s__Time17_3),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X106,X107,X108] :
( ~ s__instance(X108,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X107,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X106,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__temporalPart(X106,X107)
| ~ s__temporalPart(X107,X108)
| s__temporalPart(X106,X108) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_1262])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X9,X10,X11] :
( ~ s__instance(X10,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X9,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X9,X10)
| ~ s__instance(X11,X9)
| s__instance(X11,X10) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X8,X9] :
( ( s__instance(X8,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X8,X9) )
& ( s__instance(X9,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X8,X9) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26])])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ s__temporalPart(s__Time17_1,s__Time17_3),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( s__temporalPart(X1,X2)
| ~ s__temporalPart(X3,X2)
| ~ s__temporalPart(X1,X3)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__TimePosition) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
s__temporalPart(s__Time17_2,s__Time17_3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ s__temporalPart(s__Time17_1,s__Time17_3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( s__temporalPart(X1,s__Time17_3)
| ~ s__temporalPart(X1,s__Time17_2)
| ~ s__instance(s__Time17_2,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(s__Time17_3,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
s__temporalPart(s__Time17_1,s__Time17_2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
s__subclass(s__TimeInterval,s__TimePosition),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_908]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__instance(s__Time17_2,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(s__Time17_3,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(s__Time17_1,s__TimePosition) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimeInterval) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
s__instance(s__Time17_3,s__TimeInterval),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__instance(s__Time17_2,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(s__Time17_1,s__TimePosition) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
s__instance(s__Time17_2,s__TimeInterval),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Time17_1,s__TimePosition),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_26]),c_0_29])]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
s__instance(s__Time17_1,s__TimeInterval),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_26]),c_0_31])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.10 % Problem : CSR090+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.08/0.10 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.10/0.29 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.29 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.10/0.29 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 13:30:09 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 1.89/3.07 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 1.89/3.07 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 1.89/3.07 # Preprocessing time : 0.199 s
% 1.89/3.07
% 1.89/3.07 # Proof found!
% 1.89/3.07 # SZS status Theorem
% 1.89/3.07 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.89/3.07 # Proof object total steps : 33
% 1.89/3.07 # Proof object clause steps : 18
% 1.89/3.07 # Proof object formula steps : 15
% 1.89/3.07 # Proof object conjectures : 8
% 1.89/3.07 # Proof object clause conjectures : 5
% 1.89/3.07 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 1.89/3.07 # Proof object initial clauses used : 11
% 1.89/3.07 # Proof object initial formulas used : 10
% 1.89/3.07 # Proof object generating inferences : 6
% 1.89/3.07 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 10
% 1.89/3.07 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 1.89/3.07 # Parsed axioms : 14793
% 1.89/3.07 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 14692
% 1.89/3.07 # Initial clauses : 108
% 1.89/3.07 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 1.89/3.07 # Initial clauses in saturation : 104
% 1.89/3.07 # Processed clauses : 303
% 1.89/3.07 # ...of these trivial : 60
% 1.89/3.07 # ...subsumed : 1
% 1.89/3.07 # ...remaining for further processing : 242
% 1.89/3.07 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 1.89/3.07 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.89/3.07 # Backward-subsumed : 4
% 1.89/3.07 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 1.89/3.07 # Generated clauses : 405
% 1.89/3.07 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 344
% 1.89/3.07 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 24
% 1.89/3.07 # Paramodulations : 404
% 1.89/3.07 # Factorizations : 0
% 1.89/3.07 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 1.89/3.07 # Current number of processed clauses : 237
% 1.89/3.07 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 83
% 1.89/3.07 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.89/3.07 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 1.89/3.07 # Non-unit-clauses : 152
% 1.89/3.07 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 138
% 1.89/3.07 # ...number of literals in the above : 448
% 1.89/3.07 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.89/3.07 # Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 1.89/3.07 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2474
% 1.89/3.07 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1291
% 1.89/3.07 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 29
% 1.89/3.07 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 995
% 1.89/3.07 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.89/3.07 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 1.89/3.07 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 1.89/3.07 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.89/3.07 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.89/3.07 # Termbank termtop insertions : 117960
% 1.89/3.07
% 1.89/3.07 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.89/3.07 # User time : 0.194 s
% 1.89/3.07 # System time : 0.015 s
% 1.89/3.07 # Total time : 0.209 s
% 1.89/3.07 # Maximum resident set size: 23076 pages
% 1.89/25.06 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.89/25.07 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.89/25.09 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.89/25.09 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.89/25.09 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.89/25.09 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.89/25.10 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.89/25.10 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.89/25.10 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.89/25.10 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.89/25.11 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.89/25.11 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.89/25.11 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.89/25.11 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.89/25.11 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.89/25.11 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.89/25.11 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.89/25.11 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.89/25.12 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.89/25.12 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.89/25.12 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.89/25.12 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.89/25.12 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.89/25.12 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.89/25.12 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.89/25.12 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.89/25.13 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.89/25.13 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.89/25.13 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.89/25.13 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.89/25.13 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.89/25.13 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.89/25.13 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.89/25.13 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.89/25.14 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.89/25.14 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.89/25.14 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.89/25.14 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.89/25.14 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.89/25.14 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.89/25.14 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.89/25.14 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.89/25.15 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.89/25.15 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.89/25.15 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.89/25.15 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.89/25.26 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.89/25.27 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.89/25.27 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.89/25.28 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.89/25.28 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.89/25.28 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.89/25.28 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.89/25.29 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.89/25.29 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.89/25.30 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.89/25.30 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.89/25.30 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.89/25.30 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.89/25.31 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.89/25.31 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.89/25.31 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.89/25.31 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.89/25.32 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.89/25.32 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.89/25.32 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.89/25.32 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------