TSTP Solution File: CSR090+1 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : CSR090+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 07:36:05 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 2.39s 2.37s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.39s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (  20 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   77 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   77 (  34   ~;  31   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   6 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (   2 sgn  16   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_27,axiom,
    ! [X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ( s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass) )
     => ( ( s__subclass(X6,X7)
          & s__instance(X8,X6) )
       => s__instance(X8,X7) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fOd73Ln5ed/E---3.1_13689.p',kb_SUMO_27) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_26,axiom,
    ! [X6,X7] :
      ( s__subclass(X6,X7)
     => ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fOd73Ln5ed/E---3.1_13689.p',kb_SUMO_26) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_908,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__TimeInterval,s__TimePosition),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fOd73Ln5ed/E---3.1_13689.p',kb_SUMO_908) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_1262,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5,X105] :
      ( ( s__instance(X105,s__TimePosition)
        & s__instance(X5,s__TimePosition)
        & s__instance(X4,s__TimePosition) )
     => ( ( s__temporalPart(X4,X5)
          & s__temporalPart(X5,X105) )
       => s__temporalPart(X4,X105) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fOd73Ln5ed/E---3.1_13689.p',kb_SUMO_1262) ).

fof(local_1,axiom,
    s__instance(s__Time17_1,s__TimeInterval),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fOd73Ln5ed/E---3.1_13689.p',local_1) ).

fof(local_2,axiom,
    s__instance(s__Time17_2,s__TimeInterval),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fOd73Ln5ed/E---3.1_13689.p',local_2) ).

fof(prove_from_SUMO,conjecture,
    s__temporalPart(s__Time17_1,s__Time17_3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fOd73Ln5ed/E---3.1_13689.p',prove_from_SUMO) ).

fof(local_4,axiom,
    s__temporalPart(s__Time17_1,s__Time17_2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fOd73Ln5ed/E---3.1_13689.p',local_4) ).

fof(local_3,axiom,
    s__instance(s__Time17_3,s__TimeInterval),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fOd73Ln5ed/E---3.1_13689.p',local_3) ).

fof(local_5,axiom,
    s__temporalPart(s__Time17_2,s__Time17_3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fOd73Ln5ed/E---3.1_13689.p',local_5) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X667,X668,X669] :
      ( ~ s__instance(X668,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__instance(X667,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__subclass(X667,X668)
      | ~ s__instance(X669,X667)
      | s__instance(X669,X668) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X665,X666] :
      ( ( s__instance(X665,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__subclass(X665,X666) )
      & ( s__instance(X666,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__subclass(X665,X666) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( s__instance(X3,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,X3) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    s__subclass(s__TimeInterval,s__TimePosition),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_908]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X594,X595,X596] :
      ( ~ s__instance(X596,s__TimePosition)
      | ~ s__instance(X595,s__TimePosition)
      | ~ s__instance(X594,s__TimePosition)
      | ~ s__temporalPart(X594,X595)
      | ~ s__temporalPart(X595,X596)
      | s__temporalPart(X594,X596) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_1262])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimeInterval) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    s__instance(s__Time17_1,s__TimeInterval),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( s__temporalPart(X3,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(X3,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    s__instance(s__Time17_1,s__TimePosition),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    s__instance(s__Time17_2,s__TimeInterval),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_2]) ).

fof(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__temporalPart(s__Time17_1,s__Time17_3),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( s__temporalPart(s__Time17_1,X1)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(s__Time17_1,X2)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(X2,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    s__temporalPart(s__Time17_1,s__Time17_2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    s__instance(s__Time17_2,s__TimePosition),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    s__instance(s__Time17_3,s__TimeInterval),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_3]) ).

fof(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__temporalPart(s__Time17_1,s__Time17_3),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( s__temporalPart(s__Time17_1,X1)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(s__Time17_2,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    s__temporalPart(s__Time17_2,s__Time17_3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    s__instance(s__Time17_3,s__TimePosition),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__temporalPart(s__Time17_1,s__Time17_3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31])]),c_0_32]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : CSR090+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 15:10:38 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 1.93/2.08  Running first-order model finding
% 1.93/2.08  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fOd73Ln5ed/E---3.1_13689.p
% 2.39/2.37  # Version: 3.1.0
% 2.39/2.37  # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.39/2.37  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.39/2.37  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.39/2.37  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.39/2.37  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.39/2.37  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 2.39/2.37  # new_bool_1 with pid 13768 completed with status 0
% 2.39/2.37  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 2.39/2.37  # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.39/2.37  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.39/2.37  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.39/2.37  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.39/2.37  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.39/2.37  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 2.39/2.37  # Search class: FHHSS-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 2.39/2.37  # partial match(1): FGHSS-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 2.39/2.37  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 2.39/2.37  # Starting G-E--_208_C12_00_F1_SE_CS_PI_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 2.39/2.37  # G-E--_208_C12_00_F1_SE_CS_PI_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 13771 completed with status 0
% 2.39/2.37  # Result found by G-E--_208_C12_00_F1_SE_CS_PI_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 2.39/2.37  # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.39/2.37  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.39/2.37  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.39/2.37  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.39/2.37  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.39/2.37  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 2.39/2.37  # Search class: FHHSS-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 2.39/2.37  # partial match(1): FGHSS-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 2.39/2.37  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 2.39/2.37  # Starting G-E--_208_C12_00_F1_SE_CS_PI_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 2.39/2.37  # Preprocessing time       : 0.005 s
% 2.39/2.37  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 2.39/2.37  
% 2.39/2.37  # Proof found!
% 2.39/2.37  # SZS status Theorem
% 2.39/2.37  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.39/2.37  # Parsed axioms                        : 14793
% 2.39/2.37  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 14661
% 2.39/2.37  # Initial clauses                      : 139
% 2.39/2.37  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 4
% 2.39/2.37  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 135
% 2.39/2.37  # Processed clauses                    : 1756
% 2.39/2.37  # ...of these trivial                  : 78
% 2.39/2.37  # ...subsumed                          : 688
% 2.39/2.37  # ...remaining for further processing  : 990
% 2.39/2.37  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 2.39/2.37  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 2.39/2.37  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 2.39/2.37  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 2.39/2.37  # Generated clauses                    : 2008
% 2.39/2.37  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1765
% 2.39/2.37  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 2.39/2.37  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 20
% 2.39/2.37  # Paramodulations                      : 2007
% 2.39/2.37  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 2.39/2.37  # NegExts                              : 0
% 2.39/2.37  # Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 2.39/2.37  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 2.39/2.37  # Total rewrite steps                  : 387
% 2.39/2.37  # ...of those cached                   : 317
% 2.39/2.37  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 2.39/2.37  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 2.39/2.37  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 2.39/2.37  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 2.39/2.37  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 2.39/2.37  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 2.39/2.37  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 2.39/2.37  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 2.39/2.37  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 2.39/2.37  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 2.39/2.37  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 2.39/2.37  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 2.39/2.37  # Current number of processed clauses  : 860
% 2.39/2.37  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 96
% 2.39/2.37  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 2.39/2.37  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 2.39/2.37  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 763
% 2.39/2.37  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 271
% 2.39/2.37  # ...number of literals in the above   : 2180
% 2.39/2.37  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 2.39/2.37  # Current number of archived clauses   : 129
% 2.39/2.37  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 172916
% 2.39/2.37  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 105269
% 2.39/2.37  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 708
% 2.39/2.37  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 364
% 2.39/2.37  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 2.39/2.37  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
% 2.39/2.37  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 2.39/2.37  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 2.39/2.37  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 2.39/2.37  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 143320
% 2.39/2.37  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 53619
% 2.39/2.37  
% 2.39/2.37  # -------------------------------------------------
% 2.39/2.37  # User time                : 0.120 s
% 2.39/2.37  # System time              : 0.036 s
% 2.39/2.37  # Total time               : 0.156 s
% 2.39/2.37  # Maximum resident set size: 20244 pages
% 2.39/2.37  
% 2.39/2.37  # -------------------------------------------------
% 2.39/2.37  # User time                : 0.229 s
% 2.39/2.37  # System time              : 0.046 s
% 2.39/2.37  # Total time               : 0.275 s
% 2.39/2.37  # Maximum resident set size: 12668 pages
% 2.39/2.37  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------