TSTP Solution File: CSR089+7 by nanoCoP---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem  : CSR089+7 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : nanocop.sh %s %d

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:04:29 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unknown 148.27s 147.43s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : CSR089+7 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Fri May 19 01:15:57 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 14.95/14.75  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 14.95/14.75  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 14.95/14.75  Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 26.60/26.05  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 26.60/26.05  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 26.60/26.05  Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 37.81/37.05  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 37.81/37.05  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 37.81/37.05  Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 48.58/47.99  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 48.58/47.99  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 48.58/47.99  Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 52.10/51.41  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 52.10/51.41  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 52.10/51.41  Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 63.51/63.21  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 63.51/63.21  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 63.51/63.21  Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 73.11/72.78  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 73.11/72.78  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 73.11/72.78  Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 83.92/83.31  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 83.92/83.31  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 83.92/83.31  Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 97.14/96.96  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 97.14/96.96  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 97.14/96.96  Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 148.23/146.98  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 148.23/146.98  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 148.23/146.98  Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 148.27/147.43  Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------