TSTP Solution File: CSR089+1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR089+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 07:32:23 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 65.59s 12.79s
% Output : CNFRefutation 65.59s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 42 ( 23 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 106 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 13 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 115 ( 51 ~; 45 |; 10 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 42 ( 2 sgn 23 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_6522,axiom,
! [X552,X551] :
( ( s__instance(X551,s__EngineeringComponent)
& s__instance(X552,s__EngineeringComponent) )
=> ( s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X551,X552)
<=> ? [X553] :
( s__instance(X553,s__EngineeringConnection)
& s__connectsEngineeringComponents(X553,X551,X552) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.5ZzQH7NIiQ/E---3.1_27119.p',kb_SUMO_6522) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_27,axiom,
! [X6,X7,X8] :
( ( s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__subclass(X6,X7)
& s__instance(X8,X6) )
=> s__instance(X8,X7) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.5ZzQH7NIiQ/E---3.1_27119.p',kb_SUMO_27) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26,axiom,
! [X6,X7] :
( s__subclass(X6,X7)
=> ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.5ZzQH7NIiQ/E---3.1_27119.p',kb_SUMO_26) ).
fof(prove_from_SUMO,conjecture,
s__meetsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.5ZzQH7NIiQ/E---3.1_27119.p',prove_from_SUMO) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_55,axiom,
! [X15,X16] :
( ( s__instance(X16,s__EngineeringComponent)
& s__instance(X15,s__EngineeringComponent) )
=> ( s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X15,X16)
=> s__connected(X15,X16) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.5ZzQH7NIiQ/E---3.1_27119.p',kb_SUMO_55) ).
fof(local_4,axiom,
s__connectsEngineeringComponents(s__Object16_1,s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.5ZzQH7NIiQ/E---3.1_27119.p',local_4) ).
fof(local_3,axiom,
s__instance(s__Object16_3,s__EngineeringComponent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.5ZzQH7NIiQ/E---3.1_27119.p',local_3) ).
fof(local_2,axiom,
s__instance(s__Object16_2,s__EngineeringComponent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.5ZzQH7NIiQ/E---3.1_27119.p',local_2) ).
fof(local_1,axiom,
s__instance(s__Object16_1,s__EngineeringConnection),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.5ZzQH7NIiQ/E---3.1_27119.p',local_1) ).
fof(local_5,axiom,
~ s__overlapsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.5ZzQH7NIiQ/E---3.1_27119.p',local_5) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_4658,axiom,
! [X63,X64] :
( ( s__instance(X64,s__Object)
& s__instance(X63,s__Object) )
=> ( s__connected(X63,X64)
=> ( s__meetsSpatially(X63,X64)
| s__overlapsSpatially(X63,X64) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.5ZzQH7NIiQ/E---3.1_27119.p',kb_SUMO_4658) ).
fof(kb_SUMOcache_5266,axiom,
s__subclass(s__EngineeringComponent,s__Object),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.5ZzQH7NIiQ/E---3.1_27119.p',kb_SUMOcache_5266) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X1036,X1037,X1039] :
( ( s__instance(esk36_2(X1036,X1037),s__EngineeringConnection)
| ~ s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X1037,X1036)
| ~ s__instance(X1037,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__instance(X1036,s__EngineeringComponent) )
& ( s__connectsEngineeringComponents(esk36_2(X1036,X1037),X1037,X1036)
| ~ s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X1037,X1036)
| ~ s__instance(X1037,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__instance(X1036,s__EngineeringComponent) )
& ( ~ s__instance(X1039,s__EngineeringConnection)
| ~ s__connectsEngineeringComponents(X1039,X1037,X1036)
| s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X1037,X1036)
| ~ s__instance(X1037,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__instance(X1036,s__EngineeringComponent) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_6522])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X635,X636,X637] :
( ~ s__instance(X636,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X635,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X635,X636)
| ~ s__instance(X637,X635)
| s__instance(X637,X636) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27])])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X633,X634] :
( ( s__instance(X633,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X633,X634) )
& ( s__instance(X634,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X633,X634) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ s__meetsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO])]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X670,X671] :
( ~ s__instance(X671,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__instance(X670,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X670,X671)
| s__connected(X670,X671) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_55])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X2,X3)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__EngineeringConnection)
| ~ s__connectsEngineeringComponents(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__EngineeringComponent) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
s__connectsEngineeringComponents(s__Object16_1,s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
s__instance(s__Object16_3,s__EngineeringComponent),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
s__instance(s__Object16_2,s__EngineeringComponent),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
s__instance(s__Object16_1,s__EngineeringConnection),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).
fof(c_0_22,plain,
~ s__overlapsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[local_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( s__instance(X3,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
fof(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
~ s__meetsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
fof(c_0_27,plain,
! [X608,X609] :
( ~ s__instance(X609,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X608,s__Object)
| ~ s__connected(X608,X609)
| s__meetsSpatially(X608,X609)
| s__overlapsSpatially(X608,X609) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_4658])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( s__connected(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
s__connectedEngineeringComponents(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20]),c_0_21])]) ).
fof(c_0_30,plain,
~ s__overlapsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
s__subclass(s__EngineeringComponent,s__Object),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMOcache_5266]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
~ s__meetsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( s__meetsSpatially(X2,X1)
| s__overlapsSpatially(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__Object)
| ~ s__connected(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
s__connected(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_20]),c_0_19])]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
~ s__overlapsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__EngineeringComponent) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__instance(s__Object16_2,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(s__Object16_3,s__Object) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35])]),c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
s__instance(s__Object16_3,s__Object),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Object16_2,s__Object),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39])]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_20]),c_0_40]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 1.65/1.73 % Problem : CSR089+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 1.65/1.74 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 1.74/1.95 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 1.74/1.95 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 1.74/1.95 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 1.74/1.95 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 1.74/1.95 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 1.74/1.95 % CPULimit : 300
% 1.74/1.95 % WCLimit : 300
% 1.74/1.95 % DateTime : Fri May 3 15:17:54 EDT 2024
% 1.74/1.95 % CPUTime :
% 4.45/4.64 Running first-order theorem proving
% 4.45/4.64 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.5ZzQH7NIiQ/E---3.1_27119.p
% 65.59/12.79 # Version: 3.1.0
% 65.59/12.79 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 65.59/12.79 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 65.59/12.79 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 65.59/12.79 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 65.59/12.79 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 65.59/12.79 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 65.59/12.79 # sh5l with pid 27200 completed with status 0
% 65.59/12.79 # Result found by sh5l
% 65.59/12.79 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 65.59/12.79 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 65.59/12.79 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 65.59/12.79 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 65.59/12.79 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 65.59/12.79 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 65.59/12.79 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 65.59/12.79 # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 65.59/12.79 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 65.59/12.79 # Starting C07_19_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 181s (1) cores
% 65.59/12.79 # C07_19_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 27203 completed with status 0
% 65.59/12.79 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 65.59/12.79 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 65.59/12.79 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 65.59/12.79 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 65.59/12.79 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 65.59/12.79 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 65.59/12.79 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 65.59/12.79 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 65.59/12.79 # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 65.59/12.79 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 65.59/12.79 # Starting C07_19_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 181s (1) cores
% 65.59/12.79 # Preprocessing time : 0.076 s
% 65.59/12.79 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 65.59/12.79
% 65.59/12.79 # Proof found!
% 65.59/12.79 # SZS status Theorem
% 65.59/12.79 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 65.59/12.79 # Parsed axioms : 14793
% 65.59/12.79 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 8341
% 65.59/12.79 # Initial clauses : 7233
% 65.59/12.79 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 60
% 65.59/12.79 # Initial clauses in saturation : 7173
% 65.59/12.79 # Processed clauses : 27854
% 65.59/12.79 # ...of these trivial : 1929
% 65.59/12.79 # ...subsumed : 1131
% 65.59/12.79 # ...remaining for further processing : 24793
% 65.59/12.79 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 109
% 65.59/12.79 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 65.59/12.79 # Backward-subsumed : 179
% 65.59/12.79 # Backward-rewritten : 1500
% 65.59/12.79 # Generated clauses : 111497
% 65.59/12.79 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 109286
% 65.59/12.79 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 65.59/12.79 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 627
% 65.59/12.79 # Paramodulations : 111385
% 65.59/12.79 # Factorizations : 9
% 65.59/12.79 # NegExts : 0
% 65.59/12.79 # Equation resolutions : 112
% 65.59/12.79 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 65.59/12.79 # Total rewrite steps : 12049
% 65.59/12.79 # ...of those cached : 10139
% 65.59/12.79 # Propositional unsat checks : 5
% 65.59/12.79 # Propositional check models : 3
% 65.59/12.79 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 65.59/12.79 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 65.59/12.79 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 65.59/12.79 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 65.59/12.79 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 65.59/12.79 # Propositional encoding time : 0.093
% 65.59/12.79 # Propositional solver time : 0.114
% 65.59/12.79 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 65.59/12.79 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 65.59/12.79 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 65.59/12.79 # Current number of processed clauses : 16130
% 65.59/12.79 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4881
% 65.59/12.79 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 18
% 65.59/12.79 # Negative unit clauses : 92
% 65.59/12.79 # Non-unit-clauses : 11139
% 65.59/12.79 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 71686
% 65.59/12.79 # ...number of literals in the above : 329821
% 65.59/12.79 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 65.59/12.79 # Current number of archived clauses : 8605
% 65.59/12.79 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 18180043
% 65.59/12.79 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8779293
% 65.59/12.79 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1803
% 65.59/12.79 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1607944
% 65.59/12.79 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 212
% 65.59/12.79 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3483
% 65.59/12.79 # BW rewrite match successes : 681
% 65.59/12.79 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 65.59/12.79 # Condensation successes : 0
% 65.59/12.79 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2056880
% 65.59/12.79 # Search garbage collected termcells : 81486
% 65.59/12.79
% 65.59/12.79 # -------------------------------------------------
% 65.59/12.79 # User time : 7.697 s
% 65.59/12.79 # System time : 0.177 s
% 65.59/12.79 # Total time : 7.874 s
% 65.59/12.79 # Maximum resident set size: 29676 pages
% 65.59/12.79
% 65.59/12.79 # -------------------------------------------------
% 65.59/12.79 # User time : 7.886 s
% 65.59/12.79 # System time : 0.199 s
% 65.59/12.79 # Total time : 8.085 s
% 65.59/12.79 # Maximum resident set size: 12664 pages
% 65.59/12.79 % E---3.1 exiting
% 65.59/12.80 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------