TSTP Solution File: CSR087+3 by nanoCoP---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem : CSR087+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:04:27 EDT 2023
% Result : Unknown 149.74s 149.98s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR087+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Fri May 19 00:18:54 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 11.18/10.91 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 11.18/10.91 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 11.18/10.91 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 22.55/22.70 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 22.55/22.70 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 22.55/22.70 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 33.31/33.53 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 33.31/33.53 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 33.31/33.53 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 44.33/44.21 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 44.33/44.21 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 44.33/44.21 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 48.68/49.21 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 48.68/49.21 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 48.68/49.21 Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 60.05/61.01 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 60.05/61.01 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 60.05/61.01 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 71.13/72.30 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 71.13/72.30 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 71.13/72.30 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 81.62/83.10 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 81.62/83.10 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 81.62/83.10 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 96.00/97.25 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 96.00/97.25 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 96.00/97.25 Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 149.73/149.42 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 149.73/149.42 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 149.73/149.42 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 149.74/149.98 Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------