TSTP Solution File: CSR086+1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR086+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:18:18 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.55s 0.82s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.55s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 22 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 58 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 63 ( 27 ~; 24 |; 7 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 2 sgn 14 !; 3 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_27,axiom,
! [X6,X7,X8] :
( ( s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__subclass(X6,X7)
& s__instance(X8,X6) )
=> s__instance(X8,X7) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_27) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26,axiom,
! [X6,X7] :
( s__subclass(X6,X7)
=> ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_26) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_3600,axiom,
s__subclass(s__GraphLoop,s__GraphArc),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_3600) ).
fof(prove_from_SUMO,conjecture,
? [X591] : s__links(X591,X591,s__Arc13_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_3603,axiom,
! [X185] :
( s__instance(X185,s__GraphArc)
=> ( s__instance(X185,s__GraphLoop)
<=> ? [X186] :
( s__instance(X186,s__GraphNode)
& s__links(X186,X186,X185) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_3603) ).
fof(local_1,axiom,
s__instance(s__Arc13_1,s__GraphLoop),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_1) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X709,X710,X711] :
( ~ s__instance(X710,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X709,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X709,X710)
| ~ s__instance(X711,X709)
| s__instance(X711,X710) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X707,X708] :
( ( s__instance(X707,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X707,X708) )
& ( s__instance(X708,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X707,X708) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( s__instance(X3,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
s__subclass(s__GraphLoop,s__GraphArc),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_3600]) ).
fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X591] : s__links(X591,X591,s__Arc13_1),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X617,X619] :
( ( s__instance(esk10_1(X617),s__GraphNode)
| ~ s__instance(X617,s__GraphLoop)
| ~ s__instance(X617,s__GraphArc) )
& ( s__links(esk10_1(X617),esk10_1(X617),X617)
| ~ s__instance(X617,s__GraphLoop)
| ~ s__instance(X617,s__GraphArc) )
& ( ~ s__instance(X619,s__GraphNode)
| ~ s__links(X619,X619,X617)
| s__instance(X617,s__GraphLoop)
| ~ s__instance(X617,s__GraphArc) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_3603])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__GraphArc)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__GraphLoop) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
s__instance(s__Arc13_1,s__GraphLoop),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).
fof(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
! [X592] : ~ s__links(X592,X592,s__Arc13_1),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( s__links(esk10_1(X1),esk10_1(X1),X1)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__GraphLoop)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__GraphArc) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
s__instance(s__Arc13_1,s__GraphArc),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ s__links(X1,X1,s__Arc13_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_16])]),c_0_20]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : CSR086+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Sun May 19 00:24:53 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.49 Running first-order model finding
% 0.22/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/0.82 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.55/0.82 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.55/0.82 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.55/0.82 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.55/0.82 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.55/0.82 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.55/0.82 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.55/0.82 # new_bool_3 with pid 16239 completed with status 0
% 0.55/0.82 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.55/0.82 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.55/0.82 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.55/0.82 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.55/0.82 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.55/0.82 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.55/0.82 # Search class: FGHSS-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.55/0.82 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.55/0.82 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.55/0.82 # Starting G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 23s (1) cores
% 0.55/0.82 # G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with pid 16245 completed with status 0
% 0.55/0.82 # Result found by G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S4S
% 0.55/0.82 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.55/0.82 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.55/0.82 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.55/0.82 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.55/0.82 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.55/0.82 # Search class: FGHSS-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.55/0.82 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.55/0.82 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.55/0.82 # Starting G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 23s (1) cores
% 0.55/0.82 # Preprocessing time : 0.011 s
% 0.55/0.82 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.55/0.82
% 0.55/0.82 # Proof found!
% 0.55/0.82 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.55/0.82 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.55/0.82 # Parsed axioms : 14789
% 0.55/0.82 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 14680
% 0.55/0.82 # Initial clauses : 134
% 0.55/0.82 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 8
% 0.55/0.82 # Initial clauses in saturation : 126
% 0.55/0.82 # Processed clauses : 337
% 0.55/0.82 # ...of these trivial : 46
% 0.55/0.82 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.55/0.82 # ...remaining for further processing : 291
% 0.55/0.82 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.55/0.82 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.55/0.82 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.55/0.82 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.55/0.82 # Generated clauses : 406
% 0.55/0.82 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 368
% 0.55/0.82 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.55/0.82 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 13
% 0.55/0.82 # Paramodulations : 405
% 0.55/0.82 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.55/0.82 # NegExts : 0
% 0.55/0.82 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.55/0.82 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.55/0.82 # Total rewrite steps : 75
% 0.55/0.82 # ...of those cached : 52
% 0.55/0.82 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.55/0.82 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.55/0.82 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.55/0.82 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.55/0.82 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.55/0.82 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.55/0.82 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.55/0.82 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.55/0.82 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.55/0.82 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.55/0.82 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.55/0.82 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.55/0.82 # Current number of processed clauses : 169
% 0.55/0.82 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 65
% 0.55/0.82 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.55/0.82 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.55/0.82 # Non-unit-clauses : 103
% 0.55/0.82 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 276
% 0.55/0.82 # ...number of literals in the above : 586
% 0.55/0.82 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.55/0.82 # Current number of archived clauses : 121
% 0.55/0.82 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4727
% 0.55/0.82 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1693
% 0.55/0.82 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 13
% 0.55/0.82 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 141
% 0.55/0.82 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.55/0.82 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.55/0.82 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.55/0.82 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.55/0.82 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.55/0.82 # Termbank termtop insertions : 121226
% 0.55/0.82 # Search garbage collected termcells : 53878
% 0.55/0.82
% 0.55/0.82 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.82 # User time : 0.068 s
% 0.55/0.82 # System time : 0.034 s
% 0.55/0.82 # Total time : 0.102 s
% 0.55/0.82 # Maximum resident set size: 20044 pages
% 0.55/0.82
% 0.55/0.82 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.82 # User time : 0.264 s
% 0.55/0.82 # System time : 0.049 s
% 0.55/0.82 # Total time : 0.313 s
% 0.55/0.82 # Maximum resident set size: 12436 pages
% 0.55/0.82 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------