TSTP Solution File: CSR085+7 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR085+7 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 07:36:01 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 40.73s 30.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 40.73s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 101 ( 19 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 45 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 127 ( 44 ~; 44 |; 34 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 24 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 37 ( 8 sgn 19 !; 6 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_ALL,conjecture,
? [X2342] : s__instance(X2342,s__Organism),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YcrE4IIfnA/E---3.1_21433.p',prove_from_ALL) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_27491,axiom,
! [X193] :
( s__instance(X193,s__CorpuscularObject)
=> ? [X1066,X1067] :
( s__instance(X1067,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X1066,s__SetOrClass)
& s__subclass(X1066,s__Substance)
& s__subclass(X1067,s__Substance)
& s__material(X1066,X193)
& s__material(X1067,X193)
& X1066 != X1067 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YcrE4IIfnA/E---3.1_21433.p',kb_SUMO_27491) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_32603,axiom,
! [X137,X12,X136] :
( X12 = s__UnionFn(X136,X137)
<=> ! [X1138,X34,X1139] :
( ( s__instance(X136,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X12,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X137,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X1138,X136)
& s__instance(X34,X137)
& s__instance(X1139,X12) )
=> ( s__instance(X1138,X12)
& s__instance(X34,X12)
& ( s__instance(X1139,X136)
| s__instance(X1139,X137) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YcrE4IIfnA/E---3.1_21433.p',kb_SUMO_32603) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_42909,axiom,
s__instance(s__typicallyContainsPart__m,s__SpatialRelation),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YcrE4IIfnA/E---3.1_21433.p',kb_SUMO_42909) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X2342] : s__instance(X2342,s__Organism),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_ALL]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X193] :
( s__instance(X193,s__CorpuscularObject)
=> ? [X1066,X1067] :
( s__instance(X1067,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X1066,s__SetOrClass)
& s__subclass(X1066,s__Substance)
& s__subclass(X1067,s__Substance)
& s__material(X1066,X193)
& s__material(X1067,X193)
& X1066 != X1067 ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27491]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
! [X2343] : ~ s__instance(X2343,s__Organism),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X2368,X2369,X2370,X2371,X2372,X2373,X2374,X2375,X2376] :
( ( s__instance(X2371,X2369)
| ~ s__instance(X2371,X2370)
| ~ s__instance(X2372,X2368)
| ~ s__instance(X2373,X2369)
| ~ s__instance(X2370,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2369,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2368,s__SetOrClass)
| X2369 != s__UnionFn(X2370,X2368) )
& ( s__instance(X2372,X2369)
| ~ s__instance(X2371,X2370)
| ~ s__instance(X2372,X2368)
| ~ s__instance(X2373,X2369)
| ~ s__instance(X2370,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2369,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2368,s__SetOrClass)
| X2369 != s__UnionFn(X2370,X2368) )
& ( s__instance(X2373,X2370)
| s__instance(X2373,X2368)
| ~ s__instance(X2371,X2370)
| ~ s__instance(X2372,X2368)
| ~ s__instance(X2373,X2369)
| ~ s__instance(X2370,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2369,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2368,s__SetOrClass)
| X2369 != s__UnionFn(X2370,X2368) )
& ( s__instance(X2376,s__SetOrClass)
| X2375 = s__UnionFn(X2376,X2374) )
& ( s__instance(X2375,s__SetOrClass)
| X2375 = s__UnionFn(X2376,X2374) )
& ( s__instance(X2374,s__SetOrClass)
| X2375 = s__UnionFn(X2376,X2374) )
& ( s__instance(esk1_3(X2374,X2375,X2376),X2376)
| X2375 = s__UnionFn(X2376,X2374) )
& ( s__instance(esk2_3(X2374,X2375,X2376),X2374)
| X2375 = s__UnionFn(X2376,X2374) )
& ( s__instance(esk3_3(X2374,X2375,X2376),X2375)
| X2375 = s__UnionFn(X2376,X2374) )
& ( ~ s__instance(esk3_3(X2374,X2375,X2376),X2376)
| ~ s__instance(esk1_3(X2374,X2375,X2376),X2375)
| ~ s__instance(esk2_3(X2374,X2375,X2376),X2375)
| X2375 = s__UnionFn(X2376,X2374) )
& ( ~ s__instance(esk3_3(X2374,X2375,X2376),X2374)
| ~ s__instance(esk1_3(X2374,X2375,X2376),X2375)
| ~ s__instance(esk2_3(X2374,X2375,X2376),X2375)
| X2375 = s__UnionFn(X2376,X2374) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_32603])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X2611] :
( ( s__instance(esk12_1(X2611),s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2611,s__CorpuscularObject) )
& ( s__instance(esk11_1(X2611),s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2611,s__CorpuscularObject) )
& ( s__subclass(esk11_1(X2611),s__Substance)
| ~ s__instance(X2611,s__CorpuscularObject) )
& ( s__subclass(esk12_1(X2611),s__Substance)
| ~ s__instance(X2611,s__CorpuscularObject) )
& ( s__material(esk11_1(X2611),X2611)
| ~ s__instance(X2611,s__CorpuscularObject) )
& ( s__material(esk12_1(X2611),X2611)
| ~ s__instance(X2611,s__CorpuscularObject) )
& ( esk11_1(X2611) != esk12_1(X2611)
| ~ s__instance(X2611,s__CorpuscularObject) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(X1,s__Organism),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( s__instance(esk1_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| X2 = s__UnionFn(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( esk11_1(X1) != esk12_1(X1)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__CorpuscularObject) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
X1 = s__UnionFn(s__Organism,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(X1,s__CorpuscularObject),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
X1 = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
s__instance(s__typicallyContainsPart__m,s__SpatialRelation),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_42909]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR085+7 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Fri May 3 14:25:38 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 27.18/27.37 Running first-order model finding
% 27.18/27.37 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YcrE4IIfnA/E---3.1_21433.p
% 40.73/30.51 # Version: 3.1.0
% 40.73/30.51 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 40.73/30.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 40.73/30.51 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 40.73/30.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 40.73/30.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 40.73/30.51 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 40.73/30.51 # sh5l with pid 21514 completed with status 0
% 40.73/30.51 # Result found by sh5l
% 40.73/30.51 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 40.73/30.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 40.73/30.51 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 40.73/30.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 40.73/30.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 40.73/30.51 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 40.73/30.51 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 40.73/30.51 # Search class: FGHSS-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 40.73/30.51 # partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 40.73/30.51 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 40.73/30.51 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 23s (1) cores
% 40.73/30.51 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with pid 21527 completed with status 0
% 40.73/30.51 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI
% 40.73/30.51 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 40.73/30.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 40.73/30.51 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 40.73/30.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 40.73/30.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 40.73/30.51 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 40.73/30.51 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 40.73/30.51 # Search class: FGHSS-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 40.73/30.51 # partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 40.73/30.51 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 40.73/30.51 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 23s (1) cores
% 40.73/30.51 # Preprocessing time : 0.065 s
% 40.73/30.51 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 40.73/30.51
% 40.73/30.51 # Proof found!
% 40.73/30.51 # SZS status Theorem
% 40.73/30.51 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 40.73/30.51 # Parsed axioms : 55590
% 40.73/30.51 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 53960
% 40.73/30.51 # Initial clauses : 2949
% 40.73/30.51 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 156
% 40.73/30.51 # Initial clauses in saturation : 2793
% 40.73/30.51 # Processed clauses : 9635
% 40.73/30.51 # ...of these trivial : 159
% 40.73/30.51 # ...subsumed : 62
% 40.73/30.51 # ...remaining for further processing : 9414
% 40.73/30.51 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 393
% 40.73/30.51 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 40.73/30.51 # Backward-subsumed : 4754
% 40.73/30.51 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 40.73/30.51 # Generated clauses : 35633
% 40.73/30.51 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 33602
% 40.73/30.51 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 40.73/30.51 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 383
% 40.73/30.51 # Paramodulations : 34641
% 40.73/30.51 # Factorizations : 0
% 40.73/30.51 # NegExts : 0
% 40.73/30.51 # Equation resolutions : 393
% 40.73/30.51 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 40.73/30.51 # Total rewrite steps : 9221
% 40.73/30.51 # ...of those cached : 8684
% 40.73/30.51 # Propositional unsat checks : 1
% 40.73/30.51 # Propositional check models : 1
% 40.73/30.51 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 40.73/30.51 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 40.73/30.51 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 40.73/30.51 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 40.73/30.51 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 40.73/30.51 # Propositional encoding time : 0.011
% 40.73/30.51 # Propositional solver time : 0.004
% 40.73/30.51 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 40.73/30.51 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 40.73/30.51 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 40.73/30.51 # Current number of processed clauses : 931
% 40.73/30.51 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 734
% 40.73/30.51 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 40.73/30.51 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 40.73/30.51 # Non-unit-clauses : 195
% 40.73/30.51 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 29493
% 40.73/30.51 # ...number of literals in the above : 66075
% 40.73/30.51 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 40.73/30.51 # Current number of archived clauses : 8091
% 40.73/30.51 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2652874
% 40.73/30.51 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 829795
% 40.73/30.51 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 417
% 40.73/30.51 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 167533
% 40.73/30.51 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 3354
% 40.73/30.51 # BW rewrite match attempts : 18336
% 40.73/30.51 # BW rewrite match successes : 3300
% 40.73/30.51 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 40.73/30.51 # Condensation successes : 0
% 40.73/30.51 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1260266
% 40.73/30.51 # Search garbage collected termcells : 328984
% 40.73/30.51
% 40.73/30.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 40.73/30.51 # User time : 1.889 s
% 40.73/30.51 # System time : 0.247 s
% 40.73/30.51 # Total time : 2.135 s
% 40.73/30.51 # Maximum resident set size: 134224 pages
% 40.73/30.51
% 40.73/30.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 40.73/30.51 # User time : 2.760 s
% 40.73/30.51 # System time : 0.299 s
% 40.73/30.51 # Total time : 3.059 s
% 40.73/30.51 # Maximum resident set size: 58284 pages
% 40.73/30.51 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------