TSTP Solution File: CSR085+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR085+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:02:25 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.70s 2.89s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.70s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 18 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 13 ( 7 ~; 4 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 3 ( 0 sgn 2 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_SUMO,conjecture,
s__instance(s__Organism12_1,s__Organism),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',prove_from_SUMO) ).
fof(local_3,axiom,
! [X591] :
( s__instance(X591,s__Object)
=> ( s__attribute(X591,s__Living)
=> s__instance(X591,s__Organism) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',local_3) ).
fof(local_2,axiom,
s__attribute(s__Organism12_1,s__Living),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',local_2) ).
fof(local_1,axiom,
s__instance(s__Organism12_1,s__Object),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',local_1) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Organism12_1,s__Organism),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X592] :
( ~ s__instance(X592,s__Object)
| ~ s__attribute(X592,s__Living)
| s__instance(X592,s__Organism) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[local_3])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Organism12_1,s__Organism),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__Organism)
| ~ s__attribute(X1,s__Living)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
s__attribute(s__Organism12_1,s__Living),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
s__instance(s__Organism12_1,s__Object),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Organism12_1,s__Organism),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]),c_0_10]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : CSR085+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 05:08:51 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 1.70/2.89 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 1.70/2.89 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 1.70/2.89 # Preprocessing time : 0.227 s
% 1.70/2.89
% 1.70/2.89 # Proof found!
% 1.70/2.89 # SZS status Theorem
% 1.70/2.89 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.70/2.89 # Proof object total steps : 12
% 1.70/2.89 # Proof object clause steps : 5
% 1.70/2.89 # Proof object formula steps : 7
% 1.70/2.89 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 1.70/2.89 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 1.70/2.89 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 1.70/2.89 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 1.70/2.89 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 1.70/2.89 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 1.70/2.89 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 1.70/2.89 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 1.70/2.89 # Parsed axioms : 14791
% 1.70/2.89 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 14690
% 1.70/2.89 # Initial clauses : 113
% 1.70/2.89 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 1.70/2.89 # Initial clauses in saturation : 109
% 1.70/2.89 # Processed clauses : 34
% 1.70/2.89 # ...of these trivial : 4
% 1.70/2.89 # ...subsumed : 0
% 1.70/2.89 # ...remaining for further processing : 30
% 1.70/2.89 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 1.70/2.89 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.70/2.89 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 1.70/2.89 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 1.70/2.89 # Generated clauses : 19
% 1.70/2.89 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 18
% 1.70/2.89 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 1.70/2.89 # Paramodulations : 19
% 1.70/2.89 # Factorizations : 0
% 1.70/2.89 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 1.70/2.89 # Current number of processed clauses : 30
% 1.70/2.89 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 26
% 1.70/2.89 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.70/2.89 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 1.70/2.89 # Non-unit-clauses : 3
% 1.70/2.89 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 93
% 1.70/2.89 # ...number of literals in the above : 212
% 1.70/2.89 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.70/2.89 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 1.70/2.89 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 1.70/2.89 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 1.70/2.89 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 1.70/2.89 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 1.70/2.89 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.70/2.89 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 1.70/2.89 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 1.70/2.89 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.70/2.89 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.70/2.89 # Termbank termtop insertions : 111508
% 1.70/2.89
% 1.70/2.89 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.70/2.89 # User time : 0.211 s
% 1.70/2.89 # System time : 0.017 s
% 1.70/2.89 # Total time : 0.228 s
% 1.70/2.89 # Maximum resident set size: 22260 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------