TSTP Solution File: CSR085+1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR085+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:14:17 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.42s 0.69s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.42s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 18 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 13 ( 7 ~; 4 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 3 ( 0 sgn 2 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_SUMO,conjecture,
s__instance(s__Organism12_1,s__Organism),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO) ).
fof(local_3,axiom,
! [X591] :
( s__instance(X591,s__Object)
=> ( s__attribute(X591,s__Living)
=> s__instance(X591,s__Organism) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_3) ).
fof(local_2,axiom,
s__attribute(s__Organism12_1,s__Living),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_2) ).
fof(local_1,axiom,
s__instance(s__Organism12_1,s__Object),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_1) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Organism12_1,s__Organism),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X608] :
( ~ s__instance(X608,s__Object)
| ~ s__attribute(X608,s__Living)
| s__instance(X608,s__Organism) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[local_3])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Organism12_1,s__Organism),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__Organism)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object)
| ~ s__attribute(X1,s__Living) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
s__attribute(s__Organism12_1,s__Living),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
s__instance(s__Organism12_1,s__Object),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Organism12_1,s__Organism),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]),c_0_10]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.07 % Problem : CSR085+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.07/0.28 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.28 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.28 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.28 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.07/0.28 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.07/0.28 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.28 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.07/0.28 % DateTime : Sun May 19 01:40:53 EDT 2024
% 0.07/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.42/0.69 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.42/0.69 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.42/0.69 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.42/0.69 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.42/0.69 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.69 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.69 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.69 # new_bool_1 with pid 8586 completed with status 0
% 0.42/0.69 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.42/0.69 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.42/0.69 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.42/0.69 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.42/0.69 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.69 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.69 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.42/0.69 # Search class: FHHSS-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.42/0.69 # partial match(1): FGHSS-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.42/0.69 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.42/0.69 # Starting G-E--_208_C12_00_F1_SE_CS_PI_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.69 # G-E--_208_C12_00_F1_SE_CS_PI_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 8588 completed with status 0
% 0.42/0.69 # Result found by G-E--_208_C12_00_F1_SE_CS_PI_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.42/0.69 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.42/0.69 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.42/0.69 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.42/0.69 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.69 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.69 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.42/0.69 # Search class: FHHSS-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.42/0.69 # partial match(1): FGHSS-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.42/0.69 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.42/0.69 # Starting G-E--_208_C12_00_F1_SE_CS_PI_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.69 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.42/0.69 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.42/0.69
% 0.42/0.69 # Proof found!
% 0.42/0.69 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.42/0.69 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.42/0.69 # Parsed axioms : 14791
% 0.42/0.69 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 14640
% 0.42/0.69 # Initial clauses : 163
% 0.42/0.69 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 0.42/0.69 # Initial clauses in saturation : 159
% 0.42/0.69 # Processed clauses : 273
% 0.42/0.69 # ...of these trivial : 7
% 0.42/0.69 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.42/0.69 # ...remaining for further processing : 266
% 0.42/0.69 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% 0.42/0.69 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.42/0.69 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.42/0.69 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.42/0.69 # Generated clauses : 149
% 0.42/0.69 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 146
% 0.42/0.69 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.42/0.69 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 14
% 0.42/0.69 # Paramodulations : 147
% 0.42/0.69 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.42/0.69 # NegExts : 0
% 0.42/0.69 # Equation resolutions : 3
% 0.42/0.69 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.42/0.69 # Total rewrite steps : 10
% 0.42/0.69 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.42/0.69 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.42/0.69 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.42/0.69 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.42/0.69 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.42/0.69 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.42/0.69 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.42/0.69 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.42/0.69 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.42/0.69 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.42/0.69 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.42/0.69 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.42/0.69 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.42/0.69 # Current number of processed clauses : 112
% 0.42/0.69 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 106
% 0.42/0.69 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.42/0.69 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.42/0.69 # Non-unit-clauses : 5
% 0.42/0.69 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 182
% 0.42/0.69 # ...number of literals in the above : 290
% 0.42/0.69 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.42/0.69 # Current number of archived clauses : 152
% 0.42/0.69 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 524
% 0.42/0.69 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 88
% 0.42/0.69 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 14
% 0.42/0.69 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 58
% 0.42/0.69 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.42/0.69 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.42/0.69 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.42/0.69 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.42/0.69 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.42/0.69 # Termbank termtop insertions : 114541
% 0.42/0.69 # Search garbage collected termcells : 53342
% 0.42/0.69
% 0.42/0.69 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.42/0.69 # User time : 0.050 s
% 0.42/0.69 # System time : 0.020 s
% 0.42/0.69 # Total time : 0.070 s
% 0.42/0.69 # Maximum resident set size: 20008 pages
% 0.42/0.69
% 0.42/0.69 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.42/0.69 # User time : 0.230 s
% 0.42/0.69 # System time : 0.034 s
% 0.42/0.69 # Total time : 0.265 s
% 0.42/0.69 # Maximum resident set size: 12436 pages
% 0.42/0.69 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.42/0.69 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------