TSTP Solution File: CSR084+4 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR084+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:02:24 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.63s 119.81s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.63s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 16
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 33 ( 16 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 105 ( 30 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 45 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 116 ( 44 ~; 51 |; 16 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 24 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 83 ( 51 sgn 20 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_SUMO,conjecture,
s__instance(s__BananaSlug10_1,s__Invertebrate),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',prove_from_SUMO) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_3496,axiom,
! [X171,X172,X173] :
( X172 = s__UnionFn(X173,X171)
<=> ! [X174,X175,X176] :
( ( s__instance(X173,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X172,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X171,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X174,X173)
& s__instance(X175,X171)
& s__instance(X176,X172) )
=> ( s__instance(X174,X172)
& s__instance(X175,X172)
& ( s__instance(X176,X173)
| s__instance(X176,X171) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_3496) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_502,axiom,
! [X26] : s__instance(X26,s__Entity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_502) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_3533,axiom,
! [X168] :
( s__instance(X168,s__SetOrClass)
=> ( s__instance(X168,s__NullSet)
=> ~ ? [X48] : s__instance(X48,X168) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_3533) ).
fof(local_6,axiom,
s__instance(s__BananaSlug10_1,s__Animal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',local_6) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__BananaSlug10_1,s__Invertebrate),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X177,X178,X179,X180,X181,X182,X177,X178,X179] :
( ( s__instance(X180,X178)
| ~ s__instance(X180,X179)
| ~ s__instance(X181,X177)
| ~ s__instance(X182,X178)
| ~ s__instance(X179,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X178,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X177,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 != s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(X181,X178)
| ~ s__instance(X180,X179)
| ~ s__instance(X181,X177)
| ~ s__instance(X182,X178)
| ~ s__instance(X179,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X178,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X177,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 != s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(X182,X179)
| s__instance(X182,X177)
| ~ s__instance(X180,X179)
| ~ s__instance(X181,X177)
| ~ s__instance(X182,X178)
| ~ s__instance(X179,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X178,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X177,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 != s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(X179,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(X178,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(X177,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(esk158_3(X177,X178,X179),X179)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(esk159_3(X177,X178,X179),X177)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(esk160_3(X177,X178,X179),X178)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( ~ s__instance(esk160_3(X177,X178,X179),X179)
| ~ s__instance(esk158_3(X177,X178,X179),X178)
| ~ s__instance(esk159_3(X177,X178,X179),X178)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( ~ s__instance(esk160_3(X177,X178,X179),X177)
| ~ s__instance(esk158_3(X177,X178,X179),X178)
| ~ s__instance(esk159_3(X177,X178,X179),X178)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_3496])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__BananaSlug10_1,s__Invertebrate),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,X3)
| s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__BananaSlug10_1,s__Invertebrate),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( X1 = X2
| s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X27] : s__instance(X27,s__Entity),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_502]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X169,X170] :
( ~ s__instance(X169,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X169,s__NullSet)
| ~ s__instance(X170,X169) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_3533])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(s__BananaSlug10_1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
s__instance(X1,s__Entity),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__NullSet)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__NullSet)
| ~ s__instance(X2,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,X3)
| s__instance(esk159_3(X3,X1,X2),X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,s__NullSet)
| ~ s__instance(X3,esk159_3(s__NullSet,X1,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,X3)
| s__instance(esk160_3(X3,X1,X2),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( esk159_3(s__NullSet,X1,X2) = s__UnionFn(X3,X4)
| X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,s__NullSet) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( s__UnionFn(X1,X2) = s__UnionFn(X3,X4)
| X5 = s__UnionFn(X6,s__NullSet) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,s__NullSet)
| s__UnionFn(X3,X4) != X1 ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,s__NullSet)
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__UnionFn(X4,X5)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
s__UnionFn(X1,X2) = s__UnionFn(X3,s__NullSet),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,s__UnionFn(X3,X4))
| X5 = s__UnionFn(X6,s__NullSet) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
s__UnionFn(X1,X2) = s__UnionFn(X3,X4),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,s__UnionFn(X3,X4)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]),c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
X1 = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
s__instance(s__BananaSlug10_1,s__Animal),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__BananaSlug10_1,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CSR084+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 07:30:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 1.10/24.15 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.10/24.16 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.10/24.46 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.10/24.55 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.22/47.18 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.22/47.29 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.23/47.49 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.23/47.77 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.35/70.25 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.35/70.31 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.35/70.84 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.35/71.11 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.48/93.29 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.48/93.52 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.49/94.02 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.49/94.12 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.62/116.34 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.62/116.86 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.62/117.15 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.62/117.20 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.63/119.81 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 1.63/119.81
% 1.63/119.81 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.63/119.81 # OLD status Res
% 1.63/119.81 # Preprocessing time : 0.352 s
% 1.63/119.81 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_773c90a94152ea2e8c9d3df9c4b1eb6152c40c03 for 23 seconds:
% 1.63/119.81
% 1.63/119.81 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.63/119.81 # OLD status Res
% 1.63/119.81 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,,100,1.0)
% 1.63/119.81 # Preprocessing time : 0.175 s
% 1.63/119.81 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_75515770aeb32f68e33e9fbd9dff93f5a2e34f2e for 23 seconds:
% 1.63/119.81
% 1.63/119.81 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.63/119.81 # OLD status Res
% 1.63/119.81 # Preprocessing time : 0.383 s
% 1.63/119.81 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_6c565d2524e660970ec2a72c26d577f665a55420 for 23 seconds:
% 1.63/119.81
% 1.63/119.81 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.63/119.81 # OLD status Res
% 1.63/119.81 # Preprocessing time : 0.397 s
% 1.63/119.81 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_750456fc664a9e0b97096ad0f5110b1ead7d782b for 23 seconds:
% 1.63/119.81
% 1.63/119.81 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.63/119.81 # OLD status Res
% 1.63/119.81 # Preprocessing time : 0.384 s
% 1.63/119.81 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_a9abcacdf80c460fdc9fe242616d68da2308faf5 for 23 seconds:
% 1.63/119.81 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 1.63/119.81 # Preprocessing time : 0.099 s
% 1.63/119.81
% 1.63/119.81 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 1.63/119.81 # OLD status GaveUp
% 1.63/119.81 # Parsed axioms : 7225
% 1.63/119.81 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7216
% 1.63/119.81 # Initial clauses : 10
% 1.63/119.81 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Initial clauses in saturation : 10
% 1.63/119.81 # Processed clauses : 37
% 1.63/119.81 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 1.63/119.81 # ...subsumed : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # ...remaining for further processing : 36
% 1.63/119.81 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Generated clauses : 44
% 1.63/119.81 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 27
% 1.63/119.81 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Paramodulations : 44
% 1.63/119.81 # Factorizations : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Current number of processed clauses : 36
% 1.63/119.81 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 11
% 1.63/119.81 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 1.63/119.81 # Non-unit-clauses : 24
% 1.63/119.81 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 1.63/119.81 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 29
% 1.63/119.81 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9
% 1.63/119.81 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Termbank termtop insertions : 77944
% 1.63/119.81
% 1.63/119.81 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.63/119.81 # User time : 0.089 s
% 1.63/119.81 # System time : 0.011 s
% 1.63/119.81 # Total time : 0.100 s
% 1.63/119.81 # Maximum resident set size: 18456 pages
% 1.63/119.81 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_e60008599937a0dc787316fd87bf9ff4d65ffb48 for 23 seconds:
% 1.63/119.81 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,02,20000,1.0)
% 1.63/119.81 # Preprocessing time : 0.098 s
% 1.63/119.81
% 1.63/119.81 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 1.63/119.81 # OLD status GaveUp
% 1.63/119.81 # Parsed axioms : 7225
% 1.63/119.81 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7205
% 1.63/119.81 # Initial clauses : 21
% 1.63/119.81 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Initial clauses in saturation : 21
% 1.63/119.81 # Processed clauses : 104
% 1.63/119.81 # ...of these trivial : 5
% 1.63/119.81 # ...subsumed : 21
% 1.63/119.81 # ...remaining for further processing : 78
% 1.63/119.81 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Generated clauses : 108
% 1.63/119.81 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 83
% 1.63/119.81 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 7
% 1.63/119.81 # Paramodulations : 108
% 1.63/119.81 # Factorizations : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Current number of processed clauses : 78
% 1.63/119.81 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 20
% 1.63/119.81 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 1.63/119.81 # Non-unit-clauses : 57
% 1.63/119.81 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 1.63/119.81 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 740
% 1.63/119.81 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 285
% 1.63/119.81 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 28
% 1.63/119.81 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 1.63/119.81 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Termbank termtop insertions : 79232
% 1.63/119.81
% 1.63/119.81 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.63/119.81 # User time : 0.084 s
% 1.63/119.81 # System time : 0.016 s
% 1.63/119.81 # Total time : 0.100 s
% 1.63/119.81 # Maximum resident set size: 18720 pages
% 1.63/119.81 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_03d534503f753dd3be02bb3c547fa7a3e34e825e for 23 seconds:
% 1.63/119.81 # Preprocessing time : 0.282 s
% 1.63/119.81
% 1.63/119.81 # Proof found!
% 1.63/119.81 # SZS status Theorem
% 1.63/119.81 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.63/119.81 # Proof object total steps : 33
% 1.63/119.81 # Proof object clause steps : 23
% 1.63/119.81 # Proof object formula steps : 10
% 1.63/119.81 # Proof object conjectures : 7
% 1.63/119.81 # Proof object clause conjectures : 4
% 1.63/119.81 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 1.63/119.81 # Proof object initial clauses used : 7
% 1.63/119.81 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 1.63/119.81 # Proof object generating inferences : 14
% 1.63/119.81 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 4
% 1.63/119.81 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 1.63/119.81 # Parsed axioms : 7225
% 1.63/119.81 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Initial clauses : 8419
% 1.63/119.81 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 63
% 1.63/119.81 # Initial clauses in saturation : 8356
% 1.63/119.81 # Processed clauses : 8798
% 1.63/119.81 # ...of these trivial : 47
% 1.63/119.81 # ...subsumed : 338
% 1.63/119.81 # ...remaining for further processing : 8413
% 1.63/119.81 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1570
% 1.63/119.81 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Backward-subsumed : 540
% 1.63/119.81 # Backward-rewritten : 1523
% 1.63/119.81 # Generated clauses : 240817
% 1.63/119.81 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 239346
% 1.63/119.81 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1139
% 1.63/119.81 # Paramodulations : 238960
% 1.63/119.81 # Factorizations : 23
% 1.63/119.81 # Equation resolutions : 1670
% 1.63/119.81 # Current number of processed clauses : 6177
% 1.63/119.81 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3829
% 1.63/119.81 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 1.63/119.81 # Negative unit clauses : 5
% 1.63/119.81 # Non-unit-clauses : 2342
% 1.63/119.81 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 33721
% 1.63/119.81 # ...number of literals in the above : 84862
% 1.63/119.81 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Current number of archived clauses : 2227
% 1.63/119.81 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2878258
% 1.63/119.81 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 536898
% 1.63/119.81 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1494
% 1.63/119.81 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 661457
% 1.63/119.81 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 11484
% 1.63/119.81 # BW rewrite match attempts : 12349
% 1.63/119.81 # BW rewrite match successes : 11508
% 1.63/119.81 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.63/119.81 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2589423
% 1.63/119.81
% 1.63/119.81 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.63/119.81 # User time : 2.727 s
% 1.63/119.81 # System time : 0.100 s
% 1.63/119.82 # Total time : 2.827 s
% 1.63/119.82 # Maximum resident set size: 146364 pages
% 1.63/140.08 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.63/140.37 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------